Jump to content

K-Shack

Members
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by K-Shack

  1. 12 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

    Hope we see some McCrae and Harrison otherwise I'll be sad we didn't leave Wilcots on to keep our DL extra fresh and just torture Harris.

    Agreed. I can understand keeping McRae on as an injury replacement / rotation player but Harrison strikes me as a waste unless we give him rest. On paper we're thin at DE compared to previous games, although maybe Walker or Sayles can get reps at DE?

  2. 10 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

    One change I’d like to see…let’s get Harrison/McCrae with more reps on O and let Grant focus on returning kicks.  Suppose if Ellingson is back it’s a moot point.

    Grant doesn’t add much to O as an every down player, don’t mind mixing him in.  Seems like his returns are down when he takes more snaps on O.  Also let’s get a look at Harrison and McCrae in live action when the stakes aren’t too high for us.

    Fully agree. We've been using two DI spots on offensive players who haven't touched the ball, or may not have even stepped the field (Harrison). I know we need to use those roster spots in case a receiver goes down but it would be great if we could give them some reps.

    7 hours ago, Mike said:

    I agree with all of this. If they’re not going that route, why is Harrison even in the lineup? 

    In case of receiver injury is the only think I can think of. 

  3. Down 5 starters, getting basically zero production from two DI spots in McRae and Harrison and we still win by a TD on the road. What a team!

    Stars

    1. Zach, obviously.

    2. Demski, obviously. I love the versatility of where they line him up and as Sanchez said he's a problem for D's to contend with. 

    3. Schoen. So talented and smart and seems so humble and coachable. I love his dialogue with Collaros after his corner route TD. 

    4. Brady O. I like Augustine as a change of pace back, but Brady O has another level. 

    HH. Hallett. Great knockdown and some solid hits. I'm higher on him than I am on Thompson. 

     

  4. 54 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

    At least he finished his first game.  Greg Carr had almost 200 yards and then was injured in that game.  In and out of the lineup constantly.

    That body type just doesn't hold up well.  Probably should put Agudosi at boundary WR and keep him outside the hashmarks if we want him to last (next year).

    I'm all for Agudosi at boundary and bringing Bailey back to the slot where he belongs (next year). 

    44 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

    But one of those picks collaros had his arm hit as he was throwing and the guy who made the int was nowhere near a receiver.  

     

    Really every receiver nit names Schoen had a quiet night.

    Yeah you're right. I was figuring on the first pick where his route was soft rather than coming back to the ball. Second one was on the tip. 

  5. 30 minutes ago, Jesse said:

    I guess we have to remember that Bailey is in Adams' old spot.

    This is exactly what Adams did for us. He did down field blocking and came up with the occasional big first down.

    Good insight. It's a small 5-game sample but when I have a chance I'd be curious to see how Adams targets / completions per game compare to Bailey's over 5 games. 

    I also wonder if the hash mark changes may affect a Boundary WR's production. If I understand correctly it would mean it's a farther throw to the boundary than in years past.

  6. I'd really like to see the Bombers do something to get Bailey going. I recall seeing a post from the Toronto game day thread that DT noted that 90% of his production came from the waggle (h/t Bigblue204) and he doesn't seem to be doing much at the boundary WR spot. Minimal targets and minimal receptions. 

    Any chance we move Woli out that way and bring Bailey back to the slot where he belongs? I can't imagine moving Ellingson or Schoen out that way given their production but I wonder if Bailey can occupy that third slot, at least until Demski is back?

  7. 6 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

    The pass game is unimaginative but the run calling was dismal. We kept taking a boot that we hadn't run this year. We did it once in the 4th. 

    To ran play action nearly every pass play for 3 quarters. Dinwiddie out coached buck by the largest margin possible. It was mediocore pop Warner vs prime bill Walsh. Right now buck doesn't look like oc material. It's bitterly disappointing. 

    I wish we ran at the end of the second quarter on the second down play. Burn some clock and maybe you convert on a 2nd and 3. Instead, incomplete pass, and a touchdown with 14 seconds left. Granted that several plays had to happen in between, but why give them extra time to make that TD happen. Run the damn ball. 

  8. 4 hours ago, Floyd said:

    I doubt Antigha or Awe got much of a signing bonus if any...  they are coming in to compete in camp just like everyone else

    Wilson (Awe/Peters) - Bighill (Miles) - Maston (Antigha)

    Jefferson (McAllister) - Thomas (Griffiths) - Richardson - Jeffcoat (Hansen)

    Getting some serious depth on the front seven - really looking like 3-4

    Plus Jesse Briggs' return. Depth indeed!

  9. 5 hours ago, BomberBall said:

    Come on now.... If it didn’t fool anyone, it wouldn’t have worked.

    That's the only play all game where I wanted more from the coaching staff -- a timeout as soon as they motioned out of kick formation. But otherwise a perfect game.

  10. One big thing to keep in mind with Streveler is his age. He's still only 24. Aside from BLM, not many CFL QBs get meaningful snaps at that age. Most seem to take a year or two to develop before starting, after going through the NFL practice roster circus. If he develops with experience, we're in good shape. 

×
×
  • Create New...