17to85

If you're going to make someone a scapegoat you'd better make sure replacing him is going to actually make a difference. If the Bombers can get 8 sacks against the riders who have a good offensive line what can they do against the esks and their swiss cheese line? Buckle up Reilly, it's going to be a rough game.

Ottawa will have to wait until December just so as not to be signing people while the current season is still going on. It's really nothing more than an official date when Ottawa is actually part of the league.

even when there were 2 passes that blatantly are dropped by receivers that would get you first downs and allow you another series to get yardage in addition to the yards those passes would have added on to the totals? This isn't just on the qb. when you have 12 yards passing safe to say it's a collective pants shitting. 2 dropped passes does not a half make! When you lock onto your favorite QB at the moment, you really lock on! Actually 2 dropped passes can make huge differences in time. You drop a pass on 2nd and whatever, and your drive stops, you have to punt. The pass is caught and that drive could have lasted another 5 minutes of playing time (if they can keep the drive alive). The same can be said for a missed throw. yes exactly, you drop passes on 2nd downs the offense is coming off the field. Catch them and the drive keeps going and maybe goes 70 yards for a touchdown, maybe not but it's a possibility. There's no locking onto a favourite qb here, there is only trying to help people understand the big picture.

even when there were 2 passes that blatantly are dropped by receivers that would get you first downs and allow you another series to get yardage in addition to the yards those passes would have added on to the totals? This isn't just on the qb. when you have 12 yards passing safe to say it's a collective pants shitting.

Would think that this goes back to the whole thing when Walters first took over and said he contacted every team and basically put up the open for business sign. During those talks Wally probably got some kind of indication about what types of deals Walters was looking to make or would be willing to make so he went ahead and acted on it.

Woodson going to Toronto frees up a spot for Foster nicely.

Simpson is legit, no runningback would be having success in Winnipeg this season.

And what a sack that was. I woulda given it to Wild myself but I've become a bit of a fanboi of his the last whie. Turner woulda been an awesome choice as well.

could have picked any of a number of players on the bombers for defensive player of the week.

I hope they are looking for a Woods replacement....at least until Woods comes back. I know Will Ford brought that kick back for a TD...but he's no Aaron Woods. ford doesn't even do punt returns if I'm not mistaken. That's all on Johnson and sometimes Washington.

This guy return kicks at all? Could they be looking for a woods replacement?

Like how you told the truth about how Wally was using Joey Elliott? Given that he's brought in Pierce to be experience doesn't that lend some credibility to my thoughts on the matter? Doesn't that fact that he held on by a thread as the third stringer for less than half a season tell you what he thought of him? Wally want's pierce and doesn't want Elliott, doesn't that tell you something about Elliott? or more importantly the accuracy of your assesment of him? That Wally wanted a change at the position does not negate the premise that Wally wanted some experience at 3rd string.

With the Riders losing to the Bombers, could this be the week the TSN2 Fans Choice Game of the Week tonight is not a Riders game? haha the one time I'd actually watch a rider replay.

I'm a big boy, I can handle the criticism, bring it on.

Well in the case of Durant specifically, he's a lot stronger so he's harder to bring down for sure.

dislike.

Like how you told the truth about how Wally was using Joey Elliott? Given that he's brought in Pierce to be experience doesn't that lend some credibility to my thoughts on the matter?

Did anyone else who listened to the coaches show notice that Tim Burke really emphasized that Parenteau can play centre? It makes me wonder if they are considering moving Sorensen out to guard or tackle. No, I don't think Sorensen is losing his job. Parenteau being able to play centre means we don't have to dress Kowalczuk anymore. Pencer can play instead. I don't know if I would call it "losing his job". More like getting moved over to strengthen the right side of the line. Sorensen has tackle experience. Would be interesting to see something like January-Greaves-Parenteau-Kowalczuk-Sorensen, with Pencer as the sixth man. Not saying it's going to happen, but the way Tim Burke was talking it sure sounds like there is going to be a bit of a shuffle going on the OL. Sorenson has bad tackle experience... Hell the only place he's managed to stick in his travels around the league is in Winnipeg at centre. Most likely scenario is Parenteau simply plays guard, Kowalczuk is no longer the 6th ol and Pencer is.

You can be the real deal and be overhyped. He had a lot of success early, but now that teams have clued in you see what the Bombers did, take away the riders run game and make them beat you in other ways. HIs on pace numbers were unsustainable just because no runningback goes through an entire season putting up that kind of yards per game without defenses saying "OK let's focus on stopping that guy"

however Durant did also get sacked 8 times... Perhaps you're guilty of remembering the times Durant was able to get away and for Goltz you're more focussed on the times he was caught.

Conventional wisdom was that MItchell was the guy to take #1.

I think all anyone is saying is that of the options we have available to us Goltz right now is the most multidimensional and provides the most options to the offense and the most for opposing defenses to worry about. For me personally I don't have enough faith in the receivers or the o-line or the gameplan to make enough plays even if Hall is a significantly better passer, at least with Goltz there's the chance he'll take off and get some first downs with his legs.

Goltz, going to assume the bombers can get into scoring range.

I can't think of any trades Mack ever did mid season.... I might have the blinders on here, but I seriously can't remember ANY trade that Mack did.... Jyles to Toronto, trading picks to move up in the draft 2 years ago, there were some others that I can't quite recall right now. Trades aren't commonplace in the CFL though so not sure that means a hell of a lot.

Now you're moving the goal posts a bit... you said he can't read defenses but now it's just that he's a terrible passer... What exactly makes Hall a good passer? What makes him so much better a passer that it negates the huge advantage Goltz brings with his ability to run? We're not talking about the difference between Ricky Ray and Nealon Greene here, we're talking about which qb benefits the Bombers more.