Jump to content

Dodge and Burn

Members
  • Posts

    430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Dodge and Burn

  1. 3 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said:

    Disturbed they couldn't score when they were 1st and 10 at the Lions 3, that was critical "throat steppin time" and they failed to execute.  The Als saw how the Lions shut down the running game and will duplicate with a stronger front 7, I would hope they leave Zach in until they're at the 1 yd. line next time, giving them more options than a Prukop or Brady run.

    Prukop should only ever see the field when he plunges foward. Period. His packages are terrible 

  2. Maybe someone in the know could advise, but Kenny L looked like he was dealing with something all year.  

    He was not "engaged" in every game like he was in the past. Seemed his head was not in every game. 

    Either way he is a player and we will need him to step up big time for the run. 

    54 minutes ago, Noeller said:

    I don't know if other teams see Dru Brown as a better option to what they have now, as much as fans here do. Like we all love him and think he's got a future but does Ottawa think he's better than Crum, when Crum had most of a season to get reps and Brown came in two or 3 times? 

    DB has the look. 

    One of my old coaches used to say you could tell alot about a player by the way they walk....

    Dru has a future in this league. Hope it's with us. 

  3. BO doing BO stuff. 

    Zach didnt get hurt. Still puts up low numbers post September.  

    Lawler looked engaged thankfully.  (Every 3 games he does) 

    Biggie made some plays. (Like he was visible) 

    Front four on D contained Ford for the most part. 

    Our boys on the oline look hungry.  

    Nichols is an all star. 

    Rose is playing close to '19 form

    Holm keeps being highlighted...some plays...some just tackling. 

    Our kick coverage still sucks. That could be a huge issue in the big game...

     

  4. 16 hours ago, TBURGESS said:

    When the foot goes out, the play is dead, but it's not marked where the foot went out. It's marked where the ball is when the foot goes out

    Extend the ball before the foot goes out, it's where the extension of the ball is. Extend the ball after the foot goes out, you don't get the extension, it's still where the ball was when the foot touches the out of bounds. 

    I took a quick look at the rule book and I didn't find anything definitive regarding marking the ball at the foot when going out of bounds or where the ball is when the foot goes out of bounds.  

    Think of TD's on the sidelines. Player dives while his foot is in the field of play. Ball goes over the line = TD. Player dives, when his foot has touched the sideline = no TD. Neither case needs the players foot to go over the goal line. In both cases, the ball is marked where the ball is when the player touches the sidelines, not where the foot touches. 

    Lets say the VAJ dove instead of pushed the ball forward. If he stepped on the out of bounds line before he dove, he wouldn't get the field advantage of the dive. If he started the dive before he touched the boundary, then he gets where he lands, assuming a head first dive. 

    I agree with you. Ugh. 😁

  5. The amount of wallowing and frustration on RF is great entertainment.  That fan base deserves this, I've never seen idiot fans like them during thier little run a decade ago. 

    Insufferable they were. 

    It looks great on them. 

    It goes beyond thier the fans too. Pederson and that Balls guy. 

    The infamous "Riders to become a juggernaut" article from Pederson. 

    Balls is just a grade A clown. 

×
×
  • Create New...