Jump to content

MC

Members
  • Posts

    384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by MC

  1. 4 hours ago, Booch said:

    he was also benched because really he was hardly utilized....wasn't dropping balls...wasn't playing hard...he was just usually told to sit in the flat..take a dump pass and be expected to beat 3-5 guys before he basically got his feet moving...every sweep he ran was succesfull...was open many times on deep shots where our QB couldn't connect with him....but Collaros has shown he can...you put him in for the Grey Cup...his threat alone to take it to house from anywhere will open things up for others...you have to account for him out there

    We don't need Lucky on sweeps, we have Mike Miller!  

    That call was crazy.  But it worked.  

  2. 17 hours ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

    They already have a thread at RF.com discussing the move....not even joking

    This just might happen.  For some reason the Riders have an inordinate amount of pull.  A potential roughing the passer call last year impacted their ability to win the WSF and we had extra officials the very next week, and completely new rules the next season.  

    I was always surprised that they didn't manage to get field goal return teams increased to 13 players on the field at a time. 

  3. Jalen could end up in the CFL some day.  I am not sure that he will be drafted that high and I am not sure he is an NFL starting QB.  He is such a run-first QB and his accuracy was an issue in Alabama.  He has been impressive in Oklahoma though.  If he is drafted in the first round then he should send half of his first season to Lincoln Riley.  That guy is genius.

  4. 1 minute ago, gcn11 said:

    I am sure it would shock them to find out Bomber fans hate them.

    Most of the rider fans would be shocked.  They truly believe that every fan base in the country cheers for them whenever their own team is not playing.  I am not kidding.  It might have had some truth when they were suffering through successive decades of terrible teams, but not since they have become the obnoxious fan base in the history of team sport.

  5. I don't care what they do this week.  What they did last week seemed to upset a lot of posters during the week and yet they kicked butt on Sunday. 

    As long as it translates into a win this Sunday, then they can piss everyone off all they want this week. 

    Hold closed practices in Spain and cut everybody on the team but the cashier at the new store in the mall - as long as you win on Sunday - and I will completely happy with it.

  6. 1 hour ago, blue85gold said:

    That rule needs to be amended. It's the act of grabbing up high and pulling straight down that is a danger to players. Shouldn't matter exactly where you grab. 

    The horsecollar rule is intended to stop a particular mode of injury.  It is actually called more liberally now than the original intent.  Even with the wider interpretation, that tackle started at the front of the shoulder and it was not a penalty.

  7. 5 minutes ago, gcn11 said:

    No one has a more inflated record from feasting on the weak East over the past several years than the Hamilton Ti-Cats.

    Not sure that it helps all that much.  They still only play eastern teams 8 times a year - just like the Bombers do.  They have the same advantage that all the best teams in a division have - they don't have to play themselves.

  8. 16 minutes ago, Sard said:

    Thanks for this Jpan, that's great info.  It raises another question (that likely would never come up in a game).  I wonder if a Quarterback was ever put in as a place kicker, would that mean that one of the other QBs wouldn't be allowed to hold for him?

    The only regular QB/kicker that I remember was Sonny Wade.  But I think he was just a punter.

    No, wait - Don Jonas.  No idea who held for him.  I think it might have be the person who was then known as Ralph Brock.

  9. 19 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

    I look at it the opposite way. Players wear less than they did in Brock & Clements time. Shoulder pads are way smaller. There's not a lot of protection on the shoulder & upper arms with shoulder pads because the players like to show off their tats & guns nowadays.  Then the helmets. They pop on & off like baseball caps. Most aren't properly inflated because if they were they wouldn't come of the way they do. I watched the Chiefs qb Matt Moore come off the field yesterday  & he took off his helmet. It was on tight & he was grimacing while taking it of slowly.  It didn't come off easily. That meant it was properly inflated & giving him the best protection possible. Helmets shouldn't come off like a cap. I think a lot of players love to show off how hard they work out & don't like tight helmets so they wear the equipment the way they want to. Leads to more injuries. That's my take. 

    Today's shoulder pads are very good and offer good protection.  But, I am completely with you on the helmets.  It drives me absolutely crazy whenever I see one come off during the play or a player pull it off like it was a baseball cap.  A properly designed, built and fitted helmet is not easy to take off.  Anything less should result in immediate ejection from the game and, for repeat offenders, suspensions.  The Bombers drought of grey cups is a far less of a risk to the organization than lawsuits.  

  10. 40 minutes ago, Noeller said:

    Along with the players being bigger and stronger, it's the equipment...back when gear was less, it hurt more to put a lick on someone. Now, you're wearing space age stuff where you don't feel anything, so you don't think twice about really smacking someone. Grapes has been making this same case in hockey, and I fully believe it...

    Another reason is that muscles get stronger but tendons and cartilage are the same as they were back in the day.  These are the weak link and the cause of almost all injuries.  It is not just football.  Pitchers get Tommy John surgery thrown in with their first MLB contract.

     

×
×
  • Create New...