BigBlue Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 We have 2 new studs on the O-line, we added some Canadian depth Do we still go after 2 O-lineman with our top 3 picks? What is our new priority with our picks in this deep draft? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTA Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Dream Demski Round 1 Oline Round 2 11 Dline B Tennant laval Round 2 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryan35 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 I would still go after olinemen with the top 3 picks. Can never have enough depth at that position. Need to be grooming them for the future. Also there is the injuries that occur throughout the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueingreenland Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 You only go after 1 O-lineman now with one of our top 2 picks. Rich 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueandgold Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 I could see them picking an OL at number 2 then trying to trade back into the first round for Demski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Best available at 2 then split 2nds with OL and BPA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBlue Posted February 10, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 I don't know how much change Walters has left in his purse but if we can yet get LB CURRAN from Edmonton that would have a big impact on our roster planning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Stockpile OL and let 'em season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 This draft is going to be hell in terms of the NFL issue. Would almost rather pick later in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coach17 Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 Best available talent that is not going to nfl. Stockpile Canadian talent at whatever position works. Injuries occur and if overstocked can always trade for an immediate need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueandgold Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 A guy like Nik Demski who is almost certain to play in the CFL next year might be a more appealing pick at number two than someone who we could lose to the NFL as an UDFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaxon Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 Demski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 For what it's worth, Walby was tweeting today that the Bombers should take Demski. Not disagreeing with those saying it, but I've got a hard time with not taking an OL with that #2 overall... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 For what it's worth, Walby was tweeting today that the Bombers should take Demski. Not disagreeing with those saying it, but I've got a hard time with not taking an OL with that #2 overall... We're this close to repairing the damage done from past years…and letting O-Linemen walk, to arriving at a full house of capable? personnel. So now, we have to look to the future and drafting with the future in mind. The O-Line is a different entity onto itself and thank goodness Walters recognizes that. I like Demski - but I love the #2 position…for this year. They had a plan for free agency and now, with these new pieces in place, and possibly more, they'll formulate an attack plan for the draft. I'm looking forward to seeing them enact that plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 For what it's worth, Walby was tweeting today that the Bombers should take Demski. Not disagreeing with those saying it, but I've got a hard time with not taking an OL with that #2 overall... We're this close to repairing the damage done from past years…and letting O-Linemen walk, to arriving at a full house of capable? personnel. So now, we have to look to the future and drafting with the future in mind. The O-Line is a different entity onto itself and thank goodness Walters recognizes that. I like Demski - but I love the #2 position…for this year. They had a plan for free agency and now, with these new pieces in place, and possibly more, they'll formulate an attack plan for the draft. I'm looking forward to seeing them enact that plan. I read this twice, and I still have no idea what exactly you're trying to say...it feels like you used a whole lotta words, and some weird Left-Justify formatting to say a lot of nothing. Ha ha...what exactly was your point? Jaxon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPuDS Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 For what it's worth, Walby was tweeting today that the Bombers should take Demski. Not disagreeing with those saying it, but I've got a hard time with not taking an OL with that #2 overall... We're this close to repairing the damage done from past years…and letting O-Linemen walk, to arriving at a full house of capable? personnel. So now, we have to look to the future and drafting with the future in mind. The O-Line is a different entity onto itself and thank goodness Walters recognizes that. I like Demski - but I love the #2 position…for this year. They had a plan for free agency and now, with these new pieces in place, and possibly more, they'll formulate an attack plan for the draft. I'm looking forward to seeing them enact that plan. I read this twice, and I still have no idea what exactly you're trying to say...it feels like you used a whole lotta words, and some weird Left-Justify formatting to say a lot of nothing. Ha ha...what exactly was your point? Lolol. He's agreeing with you.. Wants us to finally build an oline from within. I think. He wants to draft an olinemen firstly.. Noeller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 Well I'm glad someone explained it... SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 We have 2 new studs on the O-line, we added some Canadian depth Do we still go after 2 O-lineman with our top 3 picks? What is our new priority with our picks in this deep draft? Keep stocking the cupboard with OL picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Poster Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 Seems right up Walters alley to pick Demski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 I'm betting on Demski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 Demski now at 2. OL at 11 and maybe 15 but maybe later even. As in OL at 11 but maybe a lb or dl at 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 I think MR. Dee meant get an o lineman. I can tell by the left justify he used. I am hoping for an O lineman. Noeller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty30 Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 I would take Demski at 2 and Varga at 11 or 15. I think he'll be worth the wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 For what it's worth, Walby was tweeting today that the Bombers should take Demski. Not disagreeing with those saying it, but I've got a hard time with not taking an OL with that #2 overall... We're this close to repairing the damage done from past years…and letting O-Linemen walk, to arriving at a full house of capable? personnel. So now, we have to look to the future and drafting with the future in mind. The O-Line is a different entity onto itself and thank goodness Walters recognizes that. I like Demski - but I love the #2 position…for this year. They had a plan for free agency and now, with these new pieces in place, and possibly more, they'll formulate an attack plan for the draft. I'm looking forward to seeing them enact that plan. I read this twice, and I still have no idea what exactly you're trying to say...it feels like you used a whole lotta words, and some weird Left-Justify formatting to say a lot of nothing. Ha ha...what exactly was your point? Now I have to justify what the words I left? Mark F 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted February 11, 2015 Report Share Posted February 11, 2015 Somebody on another thread, and Troy Westwood this A.M mentioned that Dile (sp) was injured a lot in the last two seasons Which means they need to get another O lineman in the draft. Mr Dee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now