rebusrankin Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Tracker said: Wellllll.....Collaros wasn't exactly lighting it up before he went down, so we ought not expect much. I expect that Zach can complete 3 passes ........on one drive. K-Shack, Piggy 1, wbbfan and 1 other 4
Tracker Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 15 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I expect that Zach can complete 3 passes ........on one drive. That would be helpful, but the acid test is whether he can win a game.
wbbfan Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 30 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I expect that Zach can complete 3 passes ........on one drive. zach has 3 games with less than 10 completions this year, so maybe he completes 9 and we win again? rebusrankin and Dr Zaius 2
rebusrankin Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 11 minutes ago, wbbfan said: zach has 3 games with less than 10 completions this year, so maybe he completes 9 and we win again? Hey 9 completed passes is still a 300% increase over last week. wbbfan 1
Noeller Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago Collaros was playing really good football I thought... He just had **** protection and the receivers let him down at times. Also MAYBE Hogan, but I just don't know enough about that stuff to say for sure... rebusrankin 1
Goalie Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Tracker said: Wellllll.....Collaros wasn't exactly lighting it up before he went down, so we ought not expect much. Vs Sask his last full game. 26 of 37 for 326. 26 completed passes is what Streveler has all season. Zach and Strev have pretty much played in the same amount of games this year. Zach is well over 2000 yards. Strev is just over 1000 yards. It’s night and day. Hell Zach is better at rushing this year even with his 7.9 yard average compared to strevelers 3.5 yd average. I mean. Zach is 100x the qb Edited 18 hours ago by Goalie
wbbfan Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Noeller said: Collaros was playing really good football I thought... He just had **** protection and the receivers let him down at times. Also MAYBE Hogan, but I just don't know enough about that stuff to say for sure... he had an excellent, maybe his best game manager play before being hurt. Hogan for sure is a problem, wrs have been one but I think are solid to good now. the ol has been all over the place. As long as kola is in it isn’t gonna be great but it should be good enough. if they’d put Vanterpool back in it’d be better but they won’t. Noeller, SpeedFlex27 and rebusrankin 3
ShyGuy Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago So fun Collaros stat Bombers have had 6 home games. Collaros has missed 2 (Suspension Week 2 vs BC, Injured Week 9 vs Toronto), been knocked out of 2 (Week 7 vs Calgary, Week 14 vs the Riders) and started and finished the game twice (Week 4 vs Edmonton, Week 11 vs Ottawa). Based on this, I expect Collaros to play this game, get injured again vs Saskatchewan, and then miss the Season Finale vs Montreal.
17to85 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 16 hours ago, Goalie said: Vs Sask his last full game. 26 of 37 for 326. And a loss
Pete Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Given what we've seen with Zac, we need to do everything we can to protect him. If Vanderpool could help do it, even if it means not adding woods, or OShea forbid Ayers. How effective Zac will be given that likely he wiil be dumping off the ball at first sign of trouble or relying on a quick passing game ( not his strength) is a question, but cant be worse than the alternative rebusrankin and Noeller 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now