Piggy 1 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago Watching bonfire here, Shnitzer claims Bombers D wasnt at fault. The stat lines would prove it. Harris ,statistically ,had his worst game of the year.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago Just now, SpeedFlex27 said: Thomas is in the Top 10 worst. he shouldn't be here. He should retire or be cut. he did nothing today except bull rush all game, penterate maybe 3 yards before getting stood up & stopped. That's all he does. Thomas brings nothing to our D. Mitchell, Wheatfall, Neufeld, Kolankowski, Corcoran, Streveler, Wilson bring nothing to the O. Eli and Wallace aren't capable of playing every down. We basically don't have a single OL who is above average. Vaughters brings nothing, can't even hold his position so the RB has to run around him like a pylon...at least that would give the rest of the D a chance to flow to the ball. Jake Kelly and Vaval are total marks if they are on the field on D. Athletes who have no ******* clue what they are doing. That's not even getting to the injury list or talking about Bryant and Jefferson who are not even 1/10th of what they were. This is a bad team. The fixation on Jake Thomas as if replacing him makes some kind of difference in winning and losing is nuts. Goalie, rebusrankin, sportmentary2012 and 1 other 1 1 1 1
Goalie Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago Just now, Piggy 1 said: Watching bonfire here, Shnitzer claims Bombers D wasnt at fault. The stat lines would prove it. Harris ,statistically ,had his worst game of the year. Honestly Harris wasn’t good this week or last week. 1 TD and 5 FGs. Our O once Zach went down did nothing. Noeller 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Piggy 1 said: Watching bonfire here, Shnitzer claims Bombers D wasnt at fault. The stat lines would prove it. Harris ,statistically ,had his worst game of the year. Our D is just alright. A good to great D turns the ball over and can get pressure with 4. Noeller, Piggy 1, rebusrankin and 1 other 1 3
Piggy 1 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago Just now, JuranBoldenRules said: Our D is just alright. A good to great D turns the ball over and can get pressure with 4. Hence why Jake should NOT be in there???? Tracker 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Piggy 1 said: Hence why Jake should NOT be in there???? The whole DL should be replaced. Jefferson has had one great game this season. Doesn't get off the line, trying to read QB eyes. Vaughters has done basically nothing and is now being run at. Major off-season mistakes. Piggy 1, JohnnyAbonny, Noeller and 2 others 3 2
kelownabomberfan Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Goalie said: Honestly Harris wasn’t good this week or last week. 1 TD and 5 FGs. Our O once Zach went down did nothing. I knew we were going to lose when Zach threw that stupid pick at the end of the first half. Mitchell wasn't even being covered and you still go to another receiver. Just insane. sportmentary2012 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Mitchell, Wheatfall, Neufeld, Kolankowski, Corcoran, Streveler, Wilson bring nothing to the O. Eli and Wallace aren't capable of playing every down. We basically don't have a single OL who is above average. Vaughters brings nothing, can't even hold his position so the RB has to run around him like a pylon...at least that would give the rest of the D a chance to flow to the ball. Jake Kelly and Vaval are total marks if they are on the field on D. Athletes who have no ******* clue what they are doing. That's not even getting to the injury list or talking about Bryant and Jefferson who are not even 1/10th of what they were. This is a bad team. The fixation on Jake Thomas as if replacing him makes some kind of difference in winning and losing is nuts. No, it's a trend. The HC plays favourites. Better players sit in favour of guys who aren't as good. Again, I'll bring up Thomas. he's useless & does virtually nothing every game. meanwhile, a player who barely got on the field & played behind Thomas in Miles Fox was a force today for the Cats at DT. Yet when he was here he backed up Thomas. This has happened way too much. Booch 1
CrazyCanuck89 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: The whole DL should be replaced. Jefferson has had one great game this season. Doesn't get off the line, trying to read QB eyes. Vaughters has done basically nothing and is now being run at. Major off-season mistakes. His bread and butter is knockdowns. The pass rush isn't there, this year. Piggy 1 1
Piggy 1 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: The whole DL should be replaced. Jefferson has had one great game this season. Doesn't get off the line, trying to read QB eyes. Vaughters has done basically nothing and is now being run at. Major off-season mistakes. Willie ,in a rotation ,can still be effective. Don't we have some prospects in house to do that ? Woods? Lawson? Person? etc.....
CrazyCanuck89 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, SpeedFlex27 said: No, it's a trend. The HC plays favourites. Better players sit in favour of guys who aren't as good. Again, I'll bring up Thomas. he's useless & does virtually nothing every game. meanwhile, a player who barely got on the field & played behind Thomas in Miles Fox was a force today for the Cats at DT. Yet when he was here he backed up Thomas. This has happened way too much. Fox has been OK for the Ti-Cats, not the one technique we expected.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: No, it's a trend. The HC plays favourites. Better players sit in favour of guys who aren't as good. Again, I'll bring up Thomas. he's useless & does virtually nothing every game. meanwhile, a player who barely got on the field & played behind Thomas in Miles Fox was a force today for the Cats at DT. Yet when he was here he backed up Thomas. This has happened way too much. Fox lived on injured list here and BC. Woods and Adams had a spot between them in 2024. Lawson blew his knee out in camp. Lawson is a good player. None of these guys are difference makers. Where are our American star players? We have camps full of duds 3 years straight. 4 minutes ago, CrazyCanuck89 said: Fox has been OK for the Ti-Cats, not the one technique we expected. He picked up a fumble so everyone saw his nameplate. Noeller and rebusrankin 2
17to85 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Piggy 1 said: Shnitzer claims Yeah what that guy doesn't know could fill a warehouse. Noeller, Mark H. and Piggy 1 1 2
BBlink Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Booch said: Are u not watching? Not a lot of points this game...but no fire Yeah watching. Our offense shutdown in the 2nd half. Sure our defense isn't great but they held their own. Noeller 1
17to85 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Defensive line got gassed in the 2nd half... again. You can survive a bit with Lawson and Thomas, but they need a backup who can help. Kornelson ain't it. Edited 4 hours ago by 17to85
BBlink Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 47 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Our D is just alright. A good to great D turns the ball over and can get pressure with 4. Yeah it's true but honestly without the refs help they give up maybe 14 points this game. Younger clearly has the game plan of giving up the underneath stuff. I don't like it. I wish we had more pressure along our d line. But that's pretty much what we've come to expect at this point. An offense worth their salt wins that game. Our o line sucks, our receivers are beyond meh. Our QB was injured. Noeller 1
Goalie Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, BBlink said: Yeah watching. Our offense shutdown in the 2nd half. Sure our defense isn't great but they held their own. Sask scored 1 TD. We had 4 turnovers in total I believe. Sask scored 1 TD. D was good. Zach when injured had 160 yards passing. Strev added 34. Under 200 or just at it in total in reality. That’s not good enough in the cfl but Brady had 20 carries for ouch 83 yards. O has got oline problems and prob OC problems. Edited 4 hours ago by Goalie BBlink 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, BBlink said: Yeah watching. Our offense shutdown in the 2nd half. Sure our defense isn't great but they held their own. D is consistent, but they don't do anything to flip the field or even score points. It's not like the 2016-2022 era team. This whole team is built on Collaros' arm. Except we didn't keep/bring in a #1 or even #2 receiver. Demski has stepped up, but can't really carry the team. Edited 4 hours ago by JuranBoldenRules BBlink, Noeller and Piggy 1 1 2
17to85 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Goalie said: Sask scored 1 TD. We had 4 turnovers in total I believe. Sask scored 1 TD. D was good. If they D was good they'd have got the ball back to the O sooner at the end. They were good in the first half, got gassed on the dl in the latter stages. Happens when most of your guys are geriatrics and you got **** all for depth. Noeller 1
wbbfan Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Defensive line got gassed in the 2nd half... again. You can survive a bit with Lawson and Thomas, but they need a backup who can help. Kornelson ain't it. they need an imp who takes the most snaps. then lawson then jake takes the fewest. ideally even two imp dts with lawson coming in to facilitate an extra imp db. Booch and Piggy 1 1 1
17to85 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Just now, wbbfan said: they need an imp who takes the most snaps. then lawson then jake takes the fewest. ideally even two imp dts with lawson coming in to facilitate an extra imp db. Yeah for me canadian is one spot. Lawson and Thomas split it (since schmekel is hurt). Then an American is the other DT and get some depth around the rest of the line. Jefferson at this point is a bit player, vaughters is ok but not an.every down guy. We really need 8 guys dressed there and used heavily. wbbfan 1
Goalie Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) We had 310 yards of total O. Sask was terrible and they had 337 yards of O. so if Sask was terrible, what the **** are we. Like Streveler has shown he can move the ball in relief this season cuz lol at D didn’t get the ball back sooner. Why? So we could throw another interception or average 4.3 yards per pass? Edited 4 hours ago by Goalie Mark H. and BBlink 2
Mark H. Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago The Riders mostly scored because of turnovers that happened in scoring range. You can't expect a D to do more than hold them to field goals, when that happens. Bottom line: a QB who can't trust his protection, is not going to do well protecting the football. Goalie, Piggy 1, BBlink and 1 other 4
17to85 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago The OL got absolutely worked back to back weeks, and has all year, we can't beat a blitz through scheme... like what the **** are they doing there? Piggy 1 and Noeller 1 1
wbbfan Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Mark H. said: The Riders mostly scored because of turnovers that happened in scoring range. You can't expect a D to do more than hold them to field goals, when that happens. Bottom line: a QB who can't trust his protection, is not going to do well protecting the football. the secondary did its job for sure. especially with in scoring range. Mark H. and Noeller 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now