Mark H. Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Goalie said: With healthy QBs yeah. But without. I’m not sure they are. Montreal sucks without Alexander. As would every other team. In fact, we might have the best siruation when it comes to that. The Strevy/BO combo can grind out some wins. Noeller 1
Goalie Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Streveler hasn’t done anything in the cfl in 5 years. He can’t even convert 1 yard plunges anymore. Bubba Zanetti and bryan35 2
bearpants Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, Goalie said: Beat Montreal. Beat Sask b2b. 8 and 4. Likely tied for 1st. they aren’t elite. Nobody is. Sask isn’t even. They have had the healthy QB tho. Bombers need some upgrades also. They aren’t elite but they appear to be better than some of you think. this is an optimistic outlook... maybe we can go in a beat Mtl's second team... winning LD is going to be nearly impossible... just hope we can get the split in the BB.... coming out of this next 3 game stretch at 7-5 is probably the best case scenario Bigblue204 1
Bigblue204 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, bearpants said: this is an optimistic outlook... maybe we can go in a beat Mtl's second team... winning LD is going to be nearly impossible... just hope we can get the split in the BB.... coming out of this next 3 game stretch at 7-5 is probably the best case scenario I'm hoping they can keep labour day close. That would be ok. It's hard to win that game when you're an elite team, nevermind one that struggles to find it's identity. Noeller 1
Noeller Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Labour Day is always a **** show. Expect a loss every year and anything else is a bonus. bigg jay, JohnnyAbonny, Bigblue204 and 3 others 5 1
bryan35 Posted 50 minutes ago Report Posted 50 minutes ago Fire Lapo. Get rid of Buck! Hogan needs to go. I see a trend on this forum.
Pete Posted 49 minutes ago Report Posted 49 minutes ago (edited) Lost in this, this was a huge win, lose and we are tied with bc, also Ottawa pulls to within 1 game Putting the crossover in jeopardy (the forest for the trees) Also some correctable mistakes which would have had us winning by double digits, The interception end of 1st half 3-7 points, the stuff on Streveler, the much discussed 2 and three sneak, the Randolph object Conduct.The two phantom pi calls The 57 yd fg attempt cost us 7 points as well Edited 47 minutes ago by Pete rebusrankin 1
17to85 Posted 48 minutes ago Report Posted 48 minutes ago 21 minutes ago, Goalie said: Streveler hasn’t done anything in the cfl in 5 years. He can’t even convert 1 yard plunges anymore. He is however 2-0 on the season
bryan35 Posted 44 minutes ago Report Posted 44 minutes ago (edited) 25 minutes ago, Goalie said: Streveler hasn’t done anything in the cfl in 5 years. He can’t even convert 1 yard plunges anymore. At this point I think Wilson is the better option on short yardage. Edited 44 minutes ago by bryan35
Booch Posted 43 minutes ago Report Posted 43 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, 17to85 said: He is however 2-0 on the season and up to last game was 13 outta 13 on them Just now, bryan35 said: At this point I think Wilson is the better option on short yardage. yeah....I agree on that...takes away risk of injury to Strev....They still havnt learned how to properly use him....Even at not 100 percent yet there is so much more they could be doing with/for him
rebusrankin Posted 26 minutes ago Report Posted 26 minutes ago 21 minutes ago, 17to85 said: He is however 2-0 on the season True and he was good in the BC game and bad in the Toronto game.
3rdand1.5 Posted 9 minutes ago Report Posted 9 minutes ago I may be in the minority here, but from what I see...once Schmekle and Person were added for rotation on teh D-line, the overall play of the unit improved...optimistic Woods can add even another notch up. Since we re-jigged our LB's I feel that they have been playing well, T Johns has surprised the heck outta me Benching bridges and moving Parker away from safety also seemed to improve the secondary, Parker is hurt, Bonds is done, but I will say although a small sample size Allen and Vaval show great promise, and Lawson jr, from my eye test has been an improvement from Bridges. In saying this, yes we still gave up an explosion play, and had a few slopy tackles, but.....I just have a feeling that this defence once a few guys settle in could become a really good unit Or specials are great...finally On offence though, I am not optimistic about, is it Hogan, is it the O-line, lack of receiver talent...is Brady more hurt then we know.....maybe, but many "questionable" calls...Some real work needs to be done with this unit
bearpants Posted 7 minutes ago Report Posted 7 minutes ago 1 minute ago, 3rdand1.5 said: I may be in the minority here, but from what I see...once Schmekle and Person were added for rotation on teh D-line, the overall play of the unit improved...optimistic Woods can add even another notch up. Since we re-jigged our LB's I feel that they have been playing well, T Johns has surprised the heck outta me Benching bridges and moving Parker away from safety also seemed to improve the secondary, Parker is hurt, Bonds is done, but I will say although a small sample size Allen and Vaval show great promise, and Lawson jr, from my eye test has been an improvement from Bridges. In saying this, yes we still gave up an explosion play, and had a few slopy tackles, but.....I just have a feeling that this defence once a few guys settle in could become a really good unit Or specials are great...finally On offence though, I am not optimistic about, is it Hogan, is it the O-line, lack of receiver talent...is Brady more hurt then we know.....maybe, but many "questionable" calls...Some real work needs to be done with this unit Schmekel > Thomas... having them both out there is the biggest problem...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now