Booch Posted Tuesday at 05:27 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:27 PM 6 minutes ago, voodoochylde said: It may be a non-issue but for free agents looking to sign somewhere, a coaching staff & management regime not under contract isn't the most attractive place to land. we had no o.c as well into FA....Another huge factor in where a guy may wanna go.....and we yreated that as no big deal....more stellar work with the ho-hum off-season 5 minutes ago, GCn20 said: I respectfully decline, wbb it's all yours. Lol It was a very baffling offseason for sure. hahah....dont be so weak lol
GCn20 Posted Tuesday at 05:28 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:28 PM Just now, Booch said: we had no o.c as well into FA....Another huge factor in where a guy may wanna go.....and we yreated that as no big deal....more stellar work with the ho-hum off-season hahah....dont be so weak lol I don't want to go to SSK twice a year. Can u blame me?
Booch Posted Tuesday at 05:35 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:35 PM 6 minutes ago, GCn20 said: I don't want to go to SSK twice a year. Can u blame me? can't argue that haha
bearpants Posted Tuesday at 06:27 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:27 PM 1 hour ago, GCn20 said: Too many big plays surrendered to be suggesting our D is playing good the identity of our defense used to be "we don't give up big plays"... you can dunk and dunk all game but we'll keep it short and hold you to FGs... now we seem to be giving up big plays regularly... Tracker 1
GCn20 Posted Tuesday at 06:30 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:30 PM 2 minutes ago, bearpants said: the identity of our defense used to be "we don't give up big plays"... you can dunk and dunk all game but we'll keep it short and hold you to FGs... now we seem to be giving up big plays regularly... And at pivotal times of the game. It's very concerning. bearpants 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted Tuesday at 06:31 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:31 PM 3 minutes ago, bearpants said: the identity of our defense used to be "we don't give up big plays"... you can dunk and dunk all game but we'll keep it short and hold you to FGs... now we seem to be giving up big plays regularly... Richie Hall era D was also all time great at turning ball over. coach17, Piggy 1, rebusrankin and 2 others 4 1
rebusrankin Posted Tuesday at 06:43 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:43 PM 1 hour ago, GCn20 said: I don't want to go to SSK twice a year. Can u blame me? No
17to85 Posted Tuesday at 07:14 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 07:14 PM 1 hour ago, GCn20 said: Too many big plays surrendered to be suggesting our D is playing good Well to be fair, a marked improvement doesn't mean good... they were THAT bad previously.
GCn20 Posted Tuesday at 07:28 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 07:28 PM (edited) 18 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Well to be fair, a marked improvement doesn't mean good... they were THAT bad previously. And are still that bad. Keeping teams to a scoring average under 24 points a game is a must to be successful in this league. Teams are piling points on us and we do not have the offence to run and gun. Last year we held teams to an average of 19 pts a game I believe. Year before was even better. Our offence took us to a 17 point first Q lead. That was erased shortly into the 3rd Q. That's not good defence. I understand that our offence didn't help, but you gotta have a D that can keep a team from coming back that quickly. Edited Tuesday at 07:34 PM by GCn20
17to85 Posted Tuesday at 07:44 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 07:44 PM You still missing the point... previously the D would been carved up to the tune of 50 points. Yeah they still got some kinks to figure out but they're better. We're looking at steps here, not instant 180.
do or die Posted Tuesday at 09:02 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:02 PM Until this secondary and receiving corps get upgraded.....we are gonna struggle
Booch Posted Tuesday at 09:57 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:57 PM 55 minutes ago, do or die said: Until this secondary and receiving corps get upgraded.....we are gonna struggle You forgot qb...center too... SpeedFlex27 1
Goalie Posted yesterday at 12:10 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:10 AM I don’t think the O should be as bad as it is even with questionable qb play at times and other individual issues. Brady is a stud. Ignored lots. Demski is our only threat. But guys like Wheatfall and sterns have shown they can play also. Hell, Mitchell caught all 3 passes even. I think a dude at the game in Calgary mentioned the differences in O schemes there. Think we running a pretty vanilla crappy O. Was Zach that bad last game? His numbers suggest no. It’s play calling.
SpeedFlex27 Posted yesterday at 04:34 AM Report Posted yesterday at 04:34 AM 14 hours ago, Goalie said: As long as you all do your jobs, mine is easy. Haha. My position would be called Team Historian & Curator
SpeedFlex27 Posted yesterday at 04:49 AM Report Posted yesterday at 04:49 AM 11 hours ago, Booch said: we had no o.c as well into FA....Another huge factor in where a guy may wanna go.....and we yreated that as no big deal....more stellar work with the ho-hum off-season Now, we have no HC or GM under contract for nest season. I expect that changes will be made this off season. They have to go 7-3 the rest of the way to equal last year. Could be doable but I have my doubts with this years team. 15 hours ago, Goalie said: In the end Walters traded Dru and In the end Walters didn’t pay Kenny. And in the end, Kyle will be a gm out east. More likely an AD in the Ontario Conference of U Sports.
Noeller Posted 19 hours ago Author Report Posted 19 hours ago MBT to the 6 Game, so the Als sign Cameron Dukes... rebusrankin 1
Stretch Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 9 minutes ago, Noeller said: MBT to the 6 Game, so the Als sign Cameron Dukes... So Evans starts and Dukes is the backup. Now we just need some of their DL and LB’s to injure themselves before next week. 🤞 Edited 19 hours ago by Stretch rebusrankin 1
rebusrankin Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 12 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: My position would be called Team Historian & Curator You would excel at this. Mark H. 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 16 hours ago, rebusrankin said: You would excel at this. Thank you. 16 hours ago, Stretch said: So Evans starts and Dukes is the backup. Now we just need some of their DL and LB’s to injure themselves before next week. 🤞 The Als are totally .... . Just goes to show just how much of a qb driven league this is.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now