2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season

[Booch]

6 minutes ago, voodoochylde said:

It may be a non-issue but for free agents looking to sign somewhere, a coaching staff & management regime not under contract isn't the most attractive place to land.

we had no o.c as well into FA....Another huge factor in where a guy may wanna go.....and we yreated that as no big deal....more stellar work with the ho-hum off-season

 

5 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

I respectfully decline, wbb it's all yours. Lol

It was a very baffling offseason for sure.

hahah....dont be so weak lol

[GCn20]

Just now, Booch said:

we had no o.c as well into FA....Another huge factor in where a guy may wanna go.....and we yreated that as no big deal....more stellar work with the ho-hum off-season

 

hahah....dont be so weak lol

I don't want to go to SSK twice a year. Can u blame me?

[Booch]

6 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

I don't want to go to SSK twice a year. Can u blame me?

can't argue that haha

[bearpants]

1 hour ago, GCn20 said:

Too many big plays surrendered to be suggesting our D is playing good

the identity of our defense used to be "we don't give up big plays"... you can dunk and dunk all game but we'll keep it short and hold you to FGs... now we seem to be giving up big plays regularly...

[GCn20]

2 minutes ago, bearpants said:

the identity of our defense used to be "we don't give up big plays"... you can dunk and dunk all game but we'll keep it short and hold you to FGs... now we seem to be giving up big plays regularly...

And at pivotal times of the game. It's very concerning.

[JuranBoldenRules]

3 minutes ago, bearpants said:

the identity of our defense used to be "we don't give up big plays"... you can dunk and dunk all game but we'll keep it short and hold you to FGs... now we seem to be giving up big plays regularly...

Richie Hall era D was also all time great at turning ball over.

[rebusrankin]

1 hour ago, GCn20 said:

I don't want to go to SSK twice a year. Can u blame me?

No

[17to85]

1 hour ago, GCn20 said:

 

Too many big plays surrendered to be suggesting our D is playing good

Well to be fair,  a marked improvement doesn't mean good... they were THAT bad previously.

[GCn20]

18 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Well to be fair,  a marked improvement doesn't mean good... they were THAT bad previously.

And are still that bad. Keeping teams to a scoring average under 24 points a game is a must to be successful in this league. Teams are piling points on us and we do not have the offence to run and gun. Last year we held teams to an average of 19 pts a game I believe. Year before was even better.

Our offence took us to a 17 point first Q lead. That was erased shortly into the 3rd Q. That's not good defence. I understand that our offence didn't help, but you gotta have a D that can keep a team from coming back that quickly.

Edited 3 hours ago by GCn20

[17to85]

You still missing the point... previously the D would been carved up to the tune of 50 points. Yeah they still got some kinks to figure out but they're better. We're looking at steps here, not instant 180.

[do or die]

Until this secondary and receiving corps get upgraded.....we are gonna struggle

[Booch]

55 minutes ago, do or die said:

Until this secondary and receiving corps get upgraded.....we are gonna struggle

You forgot qb...center too...