Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread

[bigg jay]

It's not just this year though - he disappeared for the last third of the season in 2024 before having himself a hell of a GC.  Is a team going to spend big money based on one great game 2 seasons ago? 

There are only  2 ways I can see him get that kind of money at this point of his career - a bonus heavy contract or one loaded with marketing money.

[Goalie]

Look at the jets. Old and slow. Time for the bombers to move on from old and slow players past their best before date. Shouldn’t be hard to find an end to replace Willie with. 

[GCn20]

15 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Funny how the same thing happned last year. It was February 4th  before Osh named Hogan as OC. 

Great...let's wait until then to declare he is doing the same thing.

12 hours ago, Mark H. said:

I agree. And they'll also look at who he was playing with this year.

More importantly what we were asking him to do. We are all blaming WJ for playing the defensive role his DC asked of him. We were using WJ as a DE/LBer hybrid in pretty much every 4 man front we ran and then asking him to take on every double team in a 3 man front. There was little chance he was going to do the things a DE gets recognition for. It's fine to drop him out on occasion to keep the offence off balance but we were doing it almost every play and then he just becomes an oversized and slow (by LBer standards) glorified LBer.

Edited 1 hour ago by GCn20

[wbbfan]

10 hours ago, bigg jay said:

It's not just this year though - he disappeared for the last third of the season in 2024 before having himself a hell of a GC.  Is a team going to spend big money based on one great game 2 seasons ago? 

There are only  2 ways I can see him get that kind of money at this point of his career - a bonus heavy contract or one loaded with marketing money.

Since 21, we've only seen rare glimmers of who he used to be. And the D in 21 was stacked. 

 He's also going to turn 35 next year. Even if you surround him with a stellar line up, prime wj isn't coming back. Wj who excels playing a starters volume of reps isn't coming back either. 

[Booch]

150k salary...rotational/situational leadership role id be fine with

He still has juice and value..but has to be in a platoon role type thing...and used to best capitalize his skill

We need to prioritize a couple legit inside presence guys who possess multiple technique...and the ends will look substantially better...and we need to abolish and go as far away as we can with the loyalty and favoritism plan of having guys inside who are for lack of better word...useless 95% of their snaps...

[HardCoreBlue]

1 hour ago, GCn20 said:

Great...let's wait until then to declare he is doing the same thing.

More importantly what we were asking him to do. We are all blaming WJ for playing the defensive role his DC asked of him. We were using WJ as a DE/LBer hybrid in pretty much every 4 man front we ran and then asking him to take on every double team in a 3 man front. There was little chance he was going to do the things a DE gets recognition for. It's fine to drop him out on occasion to keep the offence off balance but we were doing it almost every play and then he just becomes an oversized and slow (by LBer standards) glorified LBer.

Teetering on being a spectator and not an engaged player. So when JT is on, we're basically playing with 10 players.

Really feels like trying to force players without the skill sets to fit into a favored defensive scheme versus customizing a defensive scheme with the talent you have available.

[Booch]

10 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

Teetering on being a spectator and not an engaged player. So when JT is on, we're basically playing with 10 players.

Really feels like trying to force players without the skill sets to fit into a favored defensive scheme versus customizing a defensive scheme with the talent you have available.

yeah...we need to scrap the rigid ratio constraints...the rigid scheme based on...I not even sure these days and allow the best players to actually compete for jobs....and then select you best 24 where you have actual adequate back-up...the key part and then determine the ratio and who makes best sense scheme wise to suit their, and the units best ability

Not this pre-determined Player X is the starter regardless of injury in camp or outperformed...Position A is a Canadian position regardless if we have better options with an Import....playing sub par guys (Can or American) cause they were loyal foot soldiers in yrs gone past, or just tickle Osh's fancy....

That in a nutshell is what we have done for half a decade now....time to switch things up

[HardCoreBlue]

1 minute ago, Booch said:

yeah...we need to scrap the rigid ratio constraints...the rigid scheme based on...I not even sure these days and allow the best players to actually compete for jobs....and then select you best 24 where you have actual adequate back-up...the key part and then determine the ratio and who makes best sense scheme wise to suit their, and the units best ability

Not this pre-determined Player X is the starter regardless of injury in camp or outperformed...Position A is a Canadian position regardless if we have better options with an Import....playing sub par guys (Can or American) cause they were loyal foot soldiers in yrs gone past, or just tickle Osh's fancy....

That in a nutshell is what we have done for half a decade now....time to switch things up

Even to the most hardcore defenders of trust the process with our coaches can't argue this one.