Let's just assume, and rightfully so, that our defensive secondary gets lit up for 350+ again the next st two games and it's  just clear that nothing's changed in 3 seasons.

Who is available, and who is it that Walters might already be in quiet discussions with to take over after Banjo Bowl?

Edited August 27, 20187 yr by trueBlue83

2 hours ago, trueBlue83 said:

Let's just assume, and rightfully so, that our defensive secondary gets lit up for 350+ again the next st two games and it's  just clear that nothing's changed in 3 seasons.

Who is available, and who is it that Walters might already be in quiet discussions with to take over after Banjo Bowl?

Are you assuming that Walters is or ought to be the person to fire Hall? The only coach that Walters should have power over is O'Shea and if Walters has to bypass O'Shea, that is bad news for the organization.

The incumbent is Richie Hall.......

Whenever we give up 350....plenty of talk about the good game the D had.

I'd say MOS but his big qualifications before becoming our nearly 5 year head coach was a couple seasons as a special teams coordinator. sigh.

1 hour ago, trueBlue83 said:

Let's just assume, and rightfully so, that our defensive secondary gets lit up for 350+ again the next st two games and it's  just clear that nothing's changed in 3 seasons.

Who is available, and who is it that Walters might already be in quiet discussions with to take over after Banjo Bowl?

I would assume that Walters is not in "quiet discussions" with anyone, seeing that the head coach hires/fires this coordinators.  Personnel stuff must be a dark art.  So many people have zero clue about how this sort of stuff works.

And remember, O'Shea says he spoon-feeding Hall this year. Has anyone noticed the vast improvement?

10 hours ago, brett_c_b said:

The incumbent is Richie Hall.......

The only correct answer. 

If we were to make a change this season, I suspect it would be Jordan Younger as the immediate replacement. I could be wrong, it could be another D staff member. It could be MOS taking a more active role too.

16 minutes ago, Tracker said:

And remember, O'Shea says he spoon-feeding Hall this year. Has anyone noticed the vast improvement?

Maybe his spoon has a hole in it?

O'Shea should be taking a more active role already.

1 hour ago, BBRT said:

Maybe his spoon has a hole in it?

Or it's a fork.

1 hour ago, rebusrankin said:

If we were to make a change this season, I suspect it would be Jordan Younger as the immediate replacement. I could be wrong, it could be another D staff member. It could be MOS taking a more active role too.

Mike said in Jan 2018 that he was taking a more active role. So that apparently is not the answer.

luckily for him, nobody was paying attention when he said that.

used up my quota of snarky comments for today, so will just be reading now.

Edited August 27, 20187 yr by Mark F

19 minutes ago, Mark F said:

Mike said in Jan 2018 that he was taking a more active role. So that apparently is not the answer.

luckily for him, nobody was paying attention when he said that.

used up my quota of snarky comments for today, so will just be reading now.

We got a quota now?? Hopefully it is a high number.

2 hours ago, blue_gold_84 said:

O'Shea should be taking a more active role already.

Or it's a fork.

Well, the defence has at least one hole in it and the team was forked.

 

2 minutes ago, Tracker said:

Well, the defence has at least one hole in it and the team was forked.

 

If forketti hadn't gone offside, we woulda won i tells ya

(not snarky)

Edited August 27, 20187 yr by Mark F

18 hours ago, trueBlue83 said:

Let's just assume, and rightfully so, that our defensive secondary gets lit up for 350+ again the next st two games and it's  just clear that nothing's changed in 3 seasons.

Who is available, and who is it that Walters might already be in quiet discussions with to take over after Banjo Bowl?

I dont think we will can hall. But the incumbent would be james stanley.  

6 hours ago, Mark F said:

Mike said in Jan 2018 that he was taking a more active role. So that apparently is not the answer.

luckily for him, nobody was paying attention when he said that.

used up my quota of snarky comments for today, so will just be reading now.

The defense has taken steps forward from last season.  But still not good enough.

 

2017 Passing yards against per game: 321.6, 2017 Rushing yards against per game: 96.7

2018 Passing yards against per game: 286.20, 2018 Rushing yards against per game: 95.1

2 minutes ago, Colin Unger said:

The defense has taken steps forward from last season.  But still not good enough.

 

2017 Passing yards against per game: 321.6, 2017 Rushing yards against per game: 96.7

2018 Passing yards against per game: 286.20, 2018 Rushing yards against per game: 95.1

Against the run we are good no doubt. Does the passing yards against include the last two games?? Just wondering because we got shredded.

5 minutes ago, Colin Unger said:

The defense has taken steps forward from last season.  But still not good enough.

 

2017 Passing yards against per game: 321.6, 2017 Rushing yards against per game: 96.7

2018 Passing yards against per game: 286.20, 2018 Rushing yards against per game: 95.1

This is like saying you improved on a math test by getting 42% instead of 33%.

There absolutely must be changes in the defensive coaching staff after the season. I'd be very happy if we made changes today or tomorrow, but I just don't think it's happening this year.

15 minutes ago, ddanger said:

 Against the run we are good no doubt. Does the passing yards against include the last two games?? Just wondering because we got shredded.

Yes it includes those games.  This number should improve with back to back against Saskatchewan and then Montreal.

1 minute ago, Colin Unger said:

Yes it includes those games.  This number should improve with back to back against Saskatchewan and then Montreal.

I'm going to quote you on that!! Oh wait, I just did.

If Hall’s situation is so heavily tied to MOS.....where does that leave MOS and his situation?

1 hour ago, Eternal optimist said:

This is like saying you improved on a math test by getting 42% instead of 33%.

I had a friend I took a physics course with. after an exam, I told him I thought it was really tough test. He proclaimed that he aced it. 

I ended up getting something like 51, he got,  I kid you not, 11 out of 100. One of the funniest things ever, his face, looking at the results.

😂

If he's a bomber fan, he probably figures we're on the cusp of greatness lol.

( also,is 42 % in maths bad?)

Edited August 27, 20187 yr by Mark F

10 minutes ago, Mark F said:

I had a friend I took a physics course with. after an exam, I told him I thought it was really tough test. He proclaimed that he aced it. 

I ended up getting something like 51, he got,  I kid you not, 11 out of 100. One of the funniest things ever, his face, looking at the results.

😂

If he's a bomber fan, he probably figures we're on the cusp of greatness lol.

did you happen to go to High School in Redding, California with a guy named Matthew?

maybe blamed the multiple choice questions for not jumping out at him?

Edited August 27, 20187 yr by trueBlue83

1 hour ago, Mark F said:

I had a friend I took a physics course with. after an exam, I told him I thought it was really tough test. He proclaimed that he aced it. 

I ended up getting something like 51, he got,  I kid you not, 11 out of 100. One of the funniest things ever, his face, looking at the results.

😂

If he's a bomber fan, he probably figures we're on the cusp of greatness lol.

( also,is 42 % in maths bad?)

In university, there was a guy that I took Biology 1 with, he thought the final would be easy because it was 100% multiple choice. To discourage guessing, the scoring system penalized you with a -1 for an incorrect guess. Only guy I've ever known to end up with a negative % on his exam (-3%).