Yourface

True but literally anyone could have scored that. Don’t think Lankford has broken a tackle in his life

True but literally anyone could have scored that. Don’t think Lankford has broken a tackle in his life

True but literally anyone could have scored that. Don’t think Lankford has broken a tackle in his life

Lankford is just the worst. Never seen the guy break a tackle

We have certainly come a long way in Canadian receiving talent since the days of Aaron Hargreaves.

Well technically we are a coastal province...

Reminds me of the Michael Sims-Walker signing back in the day. Hopefully Randle can be just as good but stick around longer than one game!

Ideally I would hope the Bombers win this one despite being screwed over by the refs BIG TIME. They deserve to experience the frustration that all their opponents have had to unfairly experience this year.

It's called civic pride. Maybe a feeling that's hard to come by among Winnipeggers.

Maybe it's the altruist in me but I don't feel a sense of pride from winning a football game based on poor officiating.

I was referring to the PI call on Hollins at the 57:10 mark of this video: Awful, awful call. You can also clearly see Harris' elbow going down ahead of the goal line at the 1:55:30 mark. The refs have been VERY friendly toward the Bombers this year, sorry to break it to ya folks.

You are the one ignoring evidence, not me.

Because I have a more objective mind than the rest of you. It's not an opinion, it's pretty damn clear. The command centre was too pansy to overturn the call.

Just keeping things as objective as possible on this forum.

It was a hell of an effort by Harris as he kept his legs churning but the elbow definitely hit the ground ahead of the goal line. Hollins didn't even graze Lankford on the play. Just watched the replay a couple times. That really was an awful call.

I wouldn't say that's the only bad call they had go against them. I'd say the PI call on Hollins which led to a touchdown was completely undeserved. The Bombers were so quick to scrimmage after that, Chapdelaine didn't even get the chance to consider a challenge. It's also pretty clear to me Harris went down before reaching the goal line on the last play. His right elbow hit the ground ahead of the goal line while the ball had clearly not broken the plane.

Is Harris not down once his right elbow touches the ground? Seems to me he might have been an inch or two short of a touchdown. Probably not conclusive enough to overturn the call on the field. Genereally speaking however, the refs have been absolutely awful this year and it appears the Bombers have been beneficiaries more often than not. I don't want to complain, but I can't say the wins this year have felt as good as they should have, simply due to the poor officiating.

Agreed. The coaching is what cost us this game.

You could say that the Bombers are the Mike Beliefs of the CFL.

To be fair, Willy has been guilty of this in the past as well. Guys with little mobility run into those problems just as often.

Brandon Lee Gowton ‏@BrandonGowton 2 hil y a 2 heuresVoir la traduction CFL scout for the Blue Bombers here at Eagles practice. Getting a look at Tim Tebow maybe?

A lot of people in Edmonton have the same opinion of Nichols and Franklin as we do of Brohm and Marve.

Speaking of former CFLers.. It appears that Shawn Lemon was cut by the Steelers today. http://dkonpittsburghsports.com/2015/07/29/steelers-waive-shawn-lemon/

Maybe the rational posters to a degree yes.. But there is ample reasons listed as to why this is.. I'll reinerate again tho.. -marve hurt -brohm is more experienced -brohm is more of a pocket passer These are the 3 that stand out to me as why brohm is ahead of marve at this point.. - when Marve was not hurt....Marve was outperforming Brohm. Once again, I'm going to ask the question, when? When has Marve outperformed Brohm? In practice? In preseason? It's comments like this that make me want to lose it on people. Practice and preseason mean almost nothing. Again, I'm not saying Brohm doesn't suck, or that I don't want Marve to play. I want Marve to play, and I hope he succeeds. But we haven't seen anything from him to say he is better then Brohm yet. The rest of your comments I agree with. Last season? BROHM, B 2014 WPG 39 70 55.7 454 54 0 0 1 1.43 69.6 MARVE, R 2014 WPG 11 22 50 140 42 1 4.6 0 85.4 So you're telling me that you can tell by these stats, that Marve outperformed Brohm last season? Really? Looks pretty similar to me, other then Marve running a lot more then Brohm. With this little amount of playing time behind Marve, we can't really judge if he's better then Brohm. Again, I hope he is if he ever gets to play because I'm tired of watching Brohm. But you have no proof yet. Every time I hear people say "WE NEED TO START MARVE, HE'S BETTER THEN BROHM", all I keep hear is the past few years bouncing back..."we need to play Brink, he's better then Buck", "we need to play Elliott, he's better then Brink", "we need to play Goltz, he's better then Buck/Elliott", etc... And when they got to play what did we hear from the same people who were screaming and yelling to have them play? "Get rid of Brink/Elliott/Goltz...he sucks!". Brohm is a one-dimensional quarterback who is weak, inaccurate and immobile. You can look at those stats all you want but they don't tell the whole story. Marve played in very unusual situations last year, which makes it tough to draw conclusions from those numbers. As I've mentioned, Marve was able to move the ball just as effectively, if not more effectively than his peers in both of his regular season appearances, which is ultimately what matters. Marve has also looked much better than Brohm in preseason as well as in practice. Ultimately, Marve has had too few reps to know exactly what he's all about but it is very very very likely that he's a better option than Brohm at this point, who simply does not belong on a professional football field.

I can't think of another reason why Brohm is given such a long leash. But the cronyism? explain what you mean by that... and how it exactly relates to brohm and the bombers? Cuz i don't see it. Cuz it's a catchy buzzword that someone else made up. It has no relevance to this situation of course but hey, it sounds cool! I get the impression that Brohm gets along with Bellefeuille and co., and that they don't want to throw him under the bus. There is no other explanation for him being given such a long leash.