Up close with Blue Bombers general manager Kyle Walters: "We just need to grow a little bit more."

Blue boss reflects on three years at the helm, tees up the upcoming draft and talks about his team's revamped offence

 

Kyle Walters is three years into his time at the helm of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers and the tangible results aren’t pretty.

The Bombers have a 14-34 record and a .354 winning percentage during his time as general manager and have missed the playoffs each season.

There is renewed optimism as training camp approaches this year after Walters revamped the team’s offence through big spending in free agency, but only time will tell if that is enough to make this team even a contender for a playoff spot, let alone a Grey Cup.

Winnipeg Sun sports editor Ted Wyman sat down with Walters, the 42-year-old GM from St. Thomas, Ont., on Wednesday to address a wide variety of topics, from player personnel to the coming CFL draft, to what he does when he’s away from the work.

TW: How would you assess your first three years on the job?

KW: The ultimate grading is wins and losses. We haven’t won a lot, so as an organization we’re not doing enough. In our line of work, you win or you lose and we haven’t won enough football games. That being said, I do believe we’re building properly and each year adding a little bit here and a little bit there and trying to build continuity within the organization as we rebuild, which is always the challenge and the fine line we’re working on … you just can’t keep blowing everything up every year and thinking that the results will come. I believe in (coach) Mike (O’Shea) and I believe in the organization, in (president and CEO) Wade (Miller) and we just need to kind of grow a little bit more and win some football games.

TW: Do you put pressure on yourself to get this team to a point where it can contend for a Grey Cup and end that 25-year drought?

KW: Of course, that’s the pressure all of us put on ourselves, from Wade and Mike and everybody in the organization. There’s nothing wrong with that. We were hired to bring Grey Cups to this city and that’s what we’re working toward. Feeling the pressure to do it is not a bad thing.

TW: Talking to (Winnipeg Jets) GM Kevin Cheveldayoff fairly often, he talks a lot about the process. You still have to stick to that, right? You can’t let the pressure affect the way you do things?

KW: You still have to make big picture organizational decisions. We need to build long-term sustainable success while still trying to win short term. In the back of my mind is everything we’re trying to do here is big-picture, organizational growth to sustain winning. But we’ve got to get some wins on the field short term.

TW: You said a couple of months ago that the team needed better players on the offensive side of the ball. Do you feel like you can now say you do have those better players after the free agency period?

KW: I think after free agency, yes. When you look at this roster that I have in front of me, it’s vastly different from what it was and we’re constantly trying to improve it. We’ve added some CFL experience, we’ve added some productivity. On paper, the talent seems to have improved but now it’s ‘Can we gel as a group, how quickly can we get them up to speed with our new offensive co-ordinator (Paul LaPolice) and that sort of stuff.’ It’s not quite as cut and dried as ‘We went out, spent money and brought in better players and that translates instantly into winning.’

TW: I was talking to (Bombers president and CEO) Wade Miller this morning and he said it was one of the best free agency periods ever for a Blue Bombers team. How do you feel when you hear a comment like that?

KW: That’s fantastic for Wade and the business people that there’s an excitement generated in the off-season by bringing in talented football players. But ultimately, it has to translate on the football field or else it’s irrelevant.

TW: At last report the Saskatchewan Roughriders were still weighing their options on whether to keep or trade the first overall pick in the draft. Does that intrigue you?

KW: I don’t think so. At this point we’re well into the draft process and we’ll wrap up our meetings to finalize things at the end of this week. It’s so murky with the players who are going to have NFL interest that there’s no real clear-cut pecking order at the top. I would say no, we’re not overly interested in that No. 1 pick but we’ll see how things shake down.

TW: Are you pretty happy with those picks at No. 9 and No. 10 or would you look to move up at all?

KW: For sure. The big determining factor is going to be after the NFL Draft. On our draft board there are five or six names of players who are going to be fringe NFL guys. So do they get drafted, do they sign as free agents? It’s going to be a real interesting week from the NFL Draft to our draft. Everyone’s thought process is going to drastically be shaken up after that.

TW: Anybody targeting your picks?

KW: There’s always talk. We would be a primary target for somebody who wants to drop down and see if they can grab our No. 9 and No. 10 for a top-6 pick. I’ve had a couple of calls about that but I’m not comfortable yet with where that cutoff is, as in ‘We have to get to this pick to get a guy we like.’ Nothing is going to get done until after the NFL Draft because there is just so much uncertainty right now with those players.

TW: How tough is it to make a call, letting players like Bryant Turner and Clarence Denmark go from the organization?

KW: It’s very difficult. Bryant and Clarence have been pillars of this organization, they’ve been outstanding young men on and off the field, they’ve been pillars of the community and they’ve done everything we asked of them. Unfortunately, in our line of work, when you are losing, things need to change. When you add players there’s a hard cap and the reality of this line of work is you have to make tough decisions that you think are best for the organization. Those were two of them.

TW: How many more roster spots do you have available for camp?

KW: The big challenge right now will be to make sure we get the best 75 guys into training camp. There will still be a lot of work. We’ll have our offensive mini-camp up here April 25-27 and all the offensive players under contract will be there. We’re making a real push right now to get these last few guys on our neg list under contract, see if we can get their passports sorted out and get them into Winnipeg on the 25th. There’s going to be no defence out there, just the offensive players, so hopefully we’re going to get a good read on some of these younger guys. Everyone you are going to see there, from Drew Willy on down is going to have a contract and we expect them to be in training camp barring some unforeseen injury.

TW: Speaking of Drew Willy, he says he’s healthy and raring to go for mini-camp, training camp and the season. What will it mean to you to have that No. 1 quarterback back?

KW: It means everything. When Drew’s been healthy we win football games, it’s that simple. Now it’s on Paul (LaPolice) and (offensive line coach) Bob (Wylie) and (running backs coach) Avon (Cobourne) and (quarterbacks coach) Buck (Pierce), all that offensive staff, to get Drew making quicker decisions, put an offensive plan in place where he can make quick decisions. Drew’s got to understand sometimes throwing a ball out of bounds or an incompletion is better than taking a hit. He’s a competitor and he’s a young guy and he’s learning that, so there’s a growth to it. He so desperately wants to make a play every single snap that he puts himself in jeopardy from time to time. He needs to understand that sometimes punting on third down is not a bad thing.

TW: How much will it mean to have an experienced backup in Matt Nichols around as well?

KW: That is critically important. When we sat down at the end of last year and said ‘What’s the key?’ the obvious ones were depth here, more Canadian talent there. But it was clear that we wanted to have a No. 2 quarterback we were comfortable with who could win us some football games. Matt made a very good impression on us around here. It seemed he was snakebitten down the stetch where he played well enough for us to win football games and we didn’t do it for him. When Paul sat down and looked at all the film, he said Matt was the guy we needed to have back. It’s comforting to know you are going to have two veteran guys in training camp.

TW: All of the free agents you brought in have pretty good track records in this league. It must be exciting for you to have a chance to see them in action?

KW: I can’t wait for the 25th. This year it’s critically important that we win – as it always is -- and it’s nice for Paul to have veteran guys to work with on the offensive side of the ball so the learning curve will be less. Andrew Harris, who is a pro and as sharp as any player there is in this league, will pick things up and Ryan Smith and Weston (Dressler) are going to provide really nice leadership on that offensive side of the ball.

TW: Touching on something you said about Andrew Harris. Being a hometown guy with some star power, do you think he’ll feel any extra pressure to perform?

KW: No, not at all. I think a knock on Andrew was when things weren’t going his way, he would kinda get down a little bit, which is not a bad thing. When you are not getting the ball as much as you want and your team is not performing offensively, there’s nothing wrong with having a player get upset. Clearly, out in Vancouver, Andrew put that pressure on himself to be the best Canadian in the league to be the best offensive player in the league. I don’t see that being any different here. He’s been around the league long enough. He’ll put pressure on himself whether he’s in Vancouver or Montreal or anywhere in between, to be the best football player he can possibly be.

TW: Mike O’Shea is starting his third year here. The wins haven’t been there but what has he done that has really impressed you?

KW: The respect he commands in that locker room among the players and the way he treats the players like men, never throws them under the bus publicly, carries himself like a head coach should. He represents our organization the way a head coach should. He’s proud to be the head coach and handles himself professionally at all times. The scouting department and myself need to give him the tools to succeed and we need to keep those guys healthy. We are on the verge, we all believe that. I believe in Mike wholeheartedly. We just need to now go out and put it on the field and win some football games.

TW: This team has a Canadian GM and a Canadian head coach. Is that something you are proud of, being someone who has grown up and worked around Canadian football for most of your life?

KW: You don’t really think about it, but there’s real passion for this league growing up in Canada and following it, playing high school football in Canada, university football in Canada, playing in the CFL, working in the Canadian college system … I love the CFL, I love being Canadian and there’s a real sense of pride to be in this position, being a Canadian.

TW: It’s a pretty high stress job and it doesn’t slow down too often, so what do you do to relax and how often do you get a chance to do it?

KW: just went through our kids’ spring itinerary. They’ll be nine and seven, my son and daughter, they’re both playing flag football this spring, they’re both playing soccer and he’s playing basketball. I’m helping coach two of the teams and my wife’s the head coach of the basketball team. So, what I do away from work is coach my kids and support them in whatever they are doing.

6 hours ago, J5V said:

Having watched Willy get pounded into a broken, bloody, pulp mercilessly for the last two seasons I thought a little compassion from the GM might have afforded him a better O-line. I admit I don't know much about football but it seems like the teams with the better O-lines don't get their QBs beaten up on like ours do.

I guess I just thought an upgraded O-line would have done more to protect our franchise QB than to suggest he simply needs to throw the ball away more and quit taking hits. Who knew we could be successful with such a strategy? I'm really looking forward to seeing us turn it around that way and learning something from KW and the football experts here in this forum that agree with him.

Sarcastic jackass is a bad look for a guy who admittedly doesn't know what he's talking about. 

16 hours ago, J5V said:

Having watched Willy get pounded into a broken, bloody, pulp mercilessly for the last two seasons I thought a little compassion from the GM might have afforded him a better O-line. I admit I don't know much about football but it seems like the teams with the better O-lines don't get their QBs beaten up on like ours do.

I guess I just thought an upgraded O-line would have done more to protect our franchise QB than to suggest he simply needs to throw the ball away more and quit taking hits. Who knew we could be successful with such a strategy? I'm really looking forward to seeing us turn it around that way and learning something from KW and the football experts here in this forum that agree with him.

at least you admit you don't know much about football. now try coming to terms with your lack of reading comprehension. 

Speaking of Drew Willy, he says he’s healthy and raring to go for mini-camp, training camp and the season. What will it mean to you to have that No. 1 quarterback back?

The question was about Drew, and what it means to have him back. It wasn’t about how the oline could improve. Everyone knows a better Oline would help. But there are other things to discuss about this team besides the poor oline play.

Sarcasm was introduced to this thread by other than me, as was the name calling and personal attacks. We even have a quote from the king of sarcasm himself, Mike O'Shea. If anyone is offended I suggest you take the issue up with them.

Speaking of reading comprehension, the interviewer's question was actually about Drew's health, and what it means to have him back. Whilst not the football expert some of you pretend to be, I know nonsense when I hear it, and to blame Drew and Drew alone for his injury woes is just that. 

 

The question was not about Drew's health, just the fact that he is healthy.

Even though you're trying very hard to steer the topic to where you want it to go, you're not succeeding. The question was about what it is to have Willy back, and was answered within the boundaries of that question. Walters, is making it known that the club is aware of concerns that go beyond the O-Line. They already know about the O-line. And he is not piling the blame on his #1 asset. He is simply letting everybody know that Drew has to be more aware of the game situations. And what he says is true. Drew does have to be more aware. It's not necessary for him to take all those hits. That's all he is saying. Every football fan can see that. It been spoken of many times. 

Read it again, they are not blaming it on Drew and Drew alone. The essence of the answer is in the answer.

55 minutes ago, J5V said:

Sarcasm was introduced to this thread by other than me, as was the name calling and personal attacks. We even have a quote from the king of sarcasm himself, Mike O'Shea. If anyone is offended I suggest you take the issue up with them.

Speaking of reading comprehension, the interviewer's question was actually about Drew's health, and what it means to have him back. Whilst not the football expert some of you pretend to be, I know nonsense when I hear it, and to blame Drew and Drew alone for his injury woes is just that. 

 

This isn't so much a "football" discussion as it is a discussion on your inability to understand that when Kyle Walters is asking a question about the sky being blue, he's not going to answer by talking about how grass is green.

54 minutes ago, J5V said:

Sarcasm was introduced to this thread by other than me, as was the name calling and personal attacks. We even have a quote from the king of sarcasm himself, Mike O'Shea. If anyone is offended I suggest you take the issue up with them.

Speaking of reading comprehension, the interviewer's question was actually about Drew's health, and what it means to have him back. Whilst not the football expert some of you pretend to be, I know nonsense when I hear it, and to blame Drew and Drew alone for his injury woes is just that. 

 

fair enough about the sarcasm. But again, the question wasn't about his health. 

Speaking of Drew Willy, he says he’s healthy and raring to go for mini-camp, training camp and the season. What will it mean to you to have that No. 1 quarterback back?

There's no question about his health in that sentence. There's a statement about him being healthy. And then the interviewer goes on to ask - What will it mean to you to have that No.1 quarterback back? - That's the question. I know that, because that sentence ends in a "?" that's how the bizarre English language works. The part about his health, isn't a question, as it ends in a period "." 

I'm also not sure where he "blames" drew willy alone for all his injury woes. But I'm getting the feeling it's pointless to try to explain anything to you.

We are going into year three with KW as GM. While I do think he has done a good job in some areas, his work with the Oline isn't one of them, IMHO.

If you're a KW fan you should be concerned for his job security because if he does get gassed this year, it will be primarily because of his failure to seriously upgrade the Oline, an Oline that has given up QB-killing sacks in record proportions during KW's tenure. If KW had one job priority, one mandate, to me, it was to build a mammoth Oline.

There is still time. Maybe KW can work some magic with the draft to get some big bodies in here. Here's to hoping. But his failure to use the interviewer's question concerning the return of his star QB as a segue to discussing the importance of upgrading said Oline speaks volumes. If KW really believes that throwing the ball away more is going to keep his QB safe he deserves to be fired. Maybe the next GM will do what it takes to keep his best player HEALTHY, upright, and productive. Maybe then we can start winning some ball games.

43 minutes ago, J5V said:

We are going into year three with KW as GM. While I do think he has done a good job in some areas, his work with the Oline isn't one of them, IMHO.

If you're a KW fan you should be concerned for his job security because if he does get gassed this year, it will be primarily because of his failure to seriously upgrade the Oline, an Oline that has given up QB-killing sacks in record proportions during KW's tenure. If KW had one job priority, one mandate, to me, it was to build a mammoth Oline.

There is still time. Maybe KW can work some magic with the draft to get some big bodies in here. Here's to hoping. But his failure to use the interviewer's question concerning the return of his star QB as a segue to discussing the importance of upgrading said Oline speaks volumes. If KW really believes that throwing the ball away more is going to keep his QB safe he deserves to be fired. Maybe the next GM will do what it takes to keep his best player HEALTHY, upright, and productive. Maybe then we can start winning some ball games.

That's quite honestly the most unreasonable thing anyone has said on this forum in a long time. It doesn't speak volumes, you're just looking for something that isn't there and stomping your feet about it.

You act like Kyle Walters hasn't talked about the need to continue to improve the Oline this offseason. He has. Just because in one interview he didn't answer a question about Drew Willy with a detour into where he thinks the Oline has improved, doesn't mean he isn't thinking about it and doesn't even mean he hasn't talked about it. He has. It's clearly a concern.

Adding to the two points already made. There's also significant evidence available that suggests throwing the ball away or making quicker decisions helps ones career even while playing behind a poor Oline - see AC and RR as well as Khari (though lots of that was toss up prayers to MR.85)

Holding onto the ball could also be interpreted as Willy not giving up on the play waiting for a receiver to get open. Having said that Willy does have to throw the ball away more & live to fight next series. Or next game.

1 hour ago, iso_55 said:

Holding onto the ball could also be interpreted as Willy not giving up on the play waiting for a receiver to get open. Having said that Willy does have to throw the ball away more & live to fight next series. Or next game.

Or you just have to give him a fighting chance to make the throw and complete the play. Is he there to win or just to survive? I know if you asked him what his answer would be.

20 minutes ago, J5V said:

Or you just have to give him a fighting chance to make the throw and complete the play. Is he there to win or just to survive? I know if you asked him what his answer would be.

He'd say he's there to win. The problem with the sacks the Bombers had in 2015 before Willy got hurt was that a lot of the time he did hang onto the ball too long. When Nicholls played I thought he got rid of the ball quicker than Willy did. We still didn't win though so it just shows the problems inherent on offense last season.

Edited April 17, 20169 yr by iso_55

31 minutes ago, iso_55 said:

He'd say he's there to win. The problem with the sacks the Bombers had in 2015 before Willy got hurt was that a lot of the time he did hang onto the ball too long. When Nicholls played I thought he got rid of the ball quicker than Willy did. We still didn't win though so it just shows the problems inherent on offense last season.

Agreed. Sometimes he needs to get the ball out quicker and sometimes he needs more time to make a play. Ideally, the latter. An extra steamboat or two and better Oline play will do wonders for both the passing and running game. Happy feet and hurried throws due to weak/no protection are a recipe for disaster.

I actually think that Nicholls processes things faster than Willy but he just doesn't have the ability to be an impactful long term starter for some reason. He is a capable & valuable back up.

48 minutes ago, iso_55 said:

I actually think that Nicholls processes things faster than Willy but he just doesn't have the ability to be an impactful long term starter for some reason. He is a capable & valuable back up.

I would agree with this, he is very quick to decide whether something is there or not and he has  better self preservation instincts than Willy.  What he lacks is the physical skills that Willy possesses.

46 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

I would agree with this, he is very quick to decide whether something is there or not and he has  better self preservation instincts than Willy.  What he lacks is the physical skills that Willy possesses.

I seem to remember Nichols footwork being just awful. They both get the happy feet going at times. 

On 15/04/2016 at 5:23 PM, mbrg said:

But we might finally get that wall built around Saskatchewan.

And have them pay for it too!

3 hours ago, iso_55 said:

I actually think that Nicholls processes things faster than Willy but he just doesn't have the ability to be an impactful long term starter for some reason. He is a capable & valuable back up.

Nichols makes horrible decisions far too often to ever keep himself on the field.  He's a good option relative to many other horrible ones like Marve etc, but if he's starting half our games or more we are far below .500 after 18 games.

Edited April 18, 20169 yr by JuranBoldenRules

36 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Nichols makes horrible decisions far too often to ever keep himself on the field.  He's a good option relative to many other horrible ones like Marve etc, but if he's starting half our games or more we are far below .500 after 18 games.

You described it better than I did. Yes, he does make bad choices under pressure.

On ‎2016‎-‎04‎-‎15 at 2:47 PM, TBURGESS said:

Don't stick my name on your jokes and we'll get along better. 

Don't take extreme positions and they won't be satire afterwards. Just saying....

Well you can tell football is a coming cause the fans they are a  getting restless lol....

1 hour ago, gcn11 said:

Don't take extreme positions and they won't be satire afterwards. Just saying....

Don't make statements that I didn't make then add my name to them, then see if I'll complain then say 'just joking' then call it satire. That's douch-bagery. Just saying...

On 4/16/2016 at 1:57 PM, Bigblue204 said:

I'm also not sure where he "blames" drew willy alone for all his injury woes. 

"He so desperately wants to make a play every single snap that he puts himself in jeopardy from time to time. He needs to understand that sometimes punting on third down is not a bad thing." -- KW

On 4/16/2016 at 3:46 PM, Mike said:

That's quite honestly the most unreasonable thing anyone has said on this forum in a long time. It doesn't speak volumes, you're just looking for something that isn't there and stomping your feet about it.

Nonsense. The elephant in any room that KW is in, is the Oline. In 3 years he has done next to nothing to fix it (Picard, Keeping...) whilst his franchise player takes a well-documented beating. I know it and KW knows it. To deny it is what's unreasonable.