Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Morning Big Blue

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Wiecek Article: Pressure Mounts On And Off Field For MOS

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/football/bombers/snappy-hed-373580051.html#st_refDomain=t.co&st_refQuery=/QmAbKLelGf

He’s got a football team counting on him.

And he’s got a city of frustrated football fans counting on him.

But it wasn’t until our discussion this week turned to the wife and three children that are also counting on him that it became clear just how much weight Mike O’Shea feels pressing down upon him right now as he heads into what is a make-or-break season for the beleaguered Winnipeg Football Club.

Make no mistake — one of two things is going to happen in 2016: either the Blue Bombers are going to make the playoffs for the first time since 2011, or the head coach — and probably a few others in the Bombers front office — are going to be looking for a new job.

And it’s that latter prospect, and what it would do to his young family, that this week brought tears to the eyes of one of the most feared linebackers the Canadian game has ever known.

Yes, you read that right: Mike O’Shea cries. And yes, it was uncomfortable to watch — and not just because it was happening in a crowded restaurant.

"I’m getting emotional now and I’ll tell you why," the Bombers head coach said over lunch this week. "I’ve got a great family. They really do a good job in making their dad feel comfortable at work…

"They’re doing more than holding up their end."

The question heading into this season is whether O’Shea can now hold up his end of a family bargain that saw his wife, Richere, and the couple’s three children — Michael, 16,  Ailish, 13 and Aisling, 10 — leave the only home they ever knew in southern Ontario in 2014 to follow O’Shea to Winnipeg so he could fulfill his dream of being a pro football head coach.

It was a bold move for a young family that O’Shea had gone to extraordinary lengths to protect from the itinerant pro football lifestyle. Indeed, O’Shea says he played his entire 16-year CFL career with just two teams in Toronto and Hamilton — turning down, he says, more lucrative offers to play in Western Canada — precisely so he wouldn’t have to uproot his family.

So moving to Winnipeg was a big thing for the entire O’Shea family. And now that they’ve finally settled in — his son is on high school football and hockey teams, his daughters are competitive gymnasts, the family spent the entire winter here, save for a week-long Bombers cruise — the idea that they’d have to move again this year because O’Shea’s head coaching dream turned into a nightmare weighs on the man of the house.

Don’t misunderstand — he says he is at peace with the fact 2016 is the final year of his three-year contract with the Bombers and there is going to be no contract extension on offer until there are first some winning results on display.

Head coaches who go 12-24 in their first two seasons don’t get contract extensions and O’Shea accepts that.

What troubles him  more, however, is that he cannot insulate his family from the uncertainty. "I’ve just realized recently that my kids really do follow all that stuff (on social media)," said O’Shea. "So it’d be naive for me to think they don’t know about the contract or lack thereof. All of that stuff — they understand...

"And that comes as bit of a shock to me — that they know more maybe than I want them to."

Now make no mistake: O’Shea is not unique. Almost every head coach in pro sports also has a team at home that is counting on him.

And O’Shea is not complaining, either. I dragged this stuff about his family out of him because it interests me to know how a guy in the spotlight copes with the vagaries of chronic job insecurity when those lights are turned off and the house is quiet and it’s just you alone in the dark with your thoughts.

The answer, it seems, is you spend a lot more time worrying about how it will affect those around you than you do about how it affect yourself.

The good news for O’Shea is that while there is no room for error in 2016, he will have by far the best team he’s had in Winnipeg with which to work.

Off-season free agent signings in Weston Dressler and Ryan Smith will make the receiving corps spectacularly better. A defensive line rid of underperformers and bolstered by some other free agent acquisitions, including Canadian Keith Shologan, will be better. The signing of all-star kicker Justin Medlock gives some much needed consistency to special teams. The Canadian content overall will be deeper, including a ratio changer at running back in Winnipegger Andrew Harris.

And, most important, with a proven backup QB in Matt Nichols behind a proven starting QB in Drew Willy, the Bombers are deeper at quarterback this year than they’ve been in a decade.

So the team around him has changed. But has O’Shea?

He admits to making mistakes in his first two years as Bombers boss, but they’re mostly detail stuff rather than big-picture. And so, for instance, O’Shea takes full blame for that blocked field goal in 2014 that cost the Bombers a win against Saskatchewan — poor scheme, he says — but he doesn’t see much in his general approach that needs to change.

He rejects a popular criticism that he should hold individual players more accountable — either on the sideline or before the microphone — and he says it’s simply not true he worries too much about players liking him and not enough about them fearing him.

"I can’t deny I still want to be one of the guys," says O’Shea,  "but that doesn’t mean I want them to be my buddies... I’d love to still be playing…

"But for 16 years, I watched what works and doesn’t work with a coach. And what doesn’t work is a lack of authenticity. I’m just not that guy who’s going to publicly display some player getting in (trouble)...I’m not going to put on a show."

And so while the team around him in 2016 will look different, don’t expect O’Shea to look different. And that includes the shorts he wears on the sidelines during games — which have filled both my mailbox and the Bombers mailbox with emails of complaint from fans.

The shorts are comfortable, he says. And they’re practical, he says. But as we’re walking out towards the parking lot, he also admits the shorts are here to stay for another reason. "If I stopped wearing them now," he tells me, "people would think it was because they complained."

You want to see stubborn? Try those shorts on for size. And then text me a picture on your Blackberry, something O’Shea also clings to.

"This phone works fine," he says. "What do I need an iPhone for?"

The man is who he is, in other words. And for all the worry about his family and his team and the upcoming season and what a very uncertain future holds, he says that, yes, he is willing to die on that hill.

"I would just die quicker," he says, "if I pretended to be someone I’m not."

paul.wiecek@freepress.mb.ca

 

  • Replies 206
  • Views 18.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • sweep the leg
    sweep the leg

    The shorts issue is arguably the stupidest head coach related issue of all time.  I loved his answer to it. Keep them just to spite the complainers is exactly what I would do.  

  • comedygeek
    comedygeek

    No needs to talk down to someone because of their "inferior post count". I don't post that often, but I'm on here almost day and consider myself a pretty knowledgeable fan. Many others are in the same

  • sweep the leg
    sweep the leg

    I'm with you on this, except I always get my hopes up too high. Wouldn't have it any other way.

Featured Replies

23 minutes ago, Jpan85 said:

I get that but the Canadian depth was complete crap when Mack took over and he was not able to get any significant players on the roster on through the draft other than Muamba

And Watson, and Greaves started for us for years. I'm not trying to hype up Macks drafting, but you are using a bit of bias with statements like that. 

its a little early to compare, but Richards and Waggoner might end up Etienne and Poblah.  walters got Chungh, Mack got Muamba, I`d say its almost a wash for both gms as far as drafts go imo

1 hour ago, Taynted_Fayth said:

its a little early to compare, but Richards and Waggoner might end up Etienne and Poblah.  walters got Chungh, Mack got Muamba, I`d say its almost a wash for both gms as far as drafts go imo

Not sure why you are tarring Waggoner with the Poblah brush.  At least Waggoner played all year and contributed.  Richards and Etienne, now there's a comparative.

Joe Mack - 2010-13

2010 - Watson (9th), Smith(28th), Woodson(29th), Greaves(45th)

2011 - Muamba(1st), Etienne(4th), Dunn(17th), Swiston(24th), Volny(32), Mahoney(31) 

2012 - Pencer(3rd), Poblah(4th(pick we used to get him)), Aprille(16th), Bilukidi(21), Stephan(23rd), Thomas(29th)

2013 - Mulumba(2nd), Robertson(11), Fitzgerald(20th), DiCroce(29th), Alli(46th), Pavopoulos(54)

Hits: Watson, Greaves, Muamba, Thomas.

First Round Misses: Etienne, Pencer, Poblah, Mulumba

Kyle Walters - 2013-Present

2014 - Goossen(2nd), Briggs(17), Jones(29), Everett(47), Eisho(56)

2015 - Chungh(2nd), Richards(11), Morgan(15), Normand(33), Lattanzio(38), Warden(46)

2016 - Waggoner(2nd (pick we used to get him))

Hits: Goossen, Chungh

First Round Misses: Maybe Waggoner, but that's still TBD

 

Poblah played too, the comparison, was supplemental picks, I did say too early to tell but could very well end up being kito 2.0. He didnt do much year 1 tho so if not much changes this year...

He did exactly what they wanted him to do go out and be solid special teamer.

3 minutes ago, Jpan85 said:

He did exactly what they wanted him to do go out and be solid special teamer.

He played in 7 games and got a single tackle. Pretty low bar for a 'solid special teamer' IMO.

Revised: Special teams tackles are in a separate column and are not added up. Looks like he got 6 special teams tackles and 1 playing on defence.

Edited by TBURGESS

Pretty sure that is wrong CFL stats fairly crappy certain he played in every game this year. They don't have you playing in the game if you don't get a stat. Had 7 SP teams tackle.

1 hour ago, Jpan85 said:

Pretty sure that is wrong CFL stats fairly crappy certain he played in every game this year. They don't have you playing in the game if you don't get a stat. Had 7 SP teams tackle.

You can only go by the stats provided.

How about this deal: The fans give MOS a pass on the last two years because he was a rookie trying to coach a crapp of a team. We give him our support in this coming year in his decisions and choice of personnel. We don't make him feel like he's on his last leg.

MOS on his part coaches this team to the best of his ability and takes the right though maybe painful steps to field the best available players. He tones down his sometimes stubborn attitude.  I am sure he puts as much effort into his coaching as he did into his playing.

 

 

 

  • Author

Based on what I've read about how tight The Trinity are, and how much the board likes 'em, I feel like Wade has a contract ready, but is very aware of the optics. I hope for a red hot start to the year, so he can pull it outta the desk and get it signed while things are rosy still...

5 hours ago, Taynted_Fayth said:

its a little early to compare, but Richards and Waggoner might end up Etienne and Poblah.  walters got Chungh, Mack got Muamba, I`d say its almost a wash for both gms as far as drafts go imo

Richards and Waggoner might end up Fantuz and O'Shea. Little early to compare though. 

The 2013 draft was a steaming pile of excrement.  I will consider a re-grade if Mulumba ever plays here. 

2 hours ago, iso_55 said:

You can only go by the stats provided.

Yes but if we know they are incorrect then it is pointless to even reference them.

Worth noting, the common refrain during Mack's reign was "well look what Kelly left for them!  Our Canadian talent is much better now."  Can't help but feel a little deja vu when reading this stuff now.

However I really do think that our Canadian talent now is the best it's been since 2011, maybe even 2007-08.  Certainly our starters look good on paper.

14 minutes ago, Atomic said:

Yes but if we know they are incorrect then it is pointless to even reference them.

He's only being consistent. He is the one who kept insisting on making arguments based on data from cflcapgeek despite everyone knowing it's wrong. Not even worth reading his posts/rants

3 hours ago, Jpan85 said:

Pretty sure that is wrong CFL stats fairly crappy certain he played in every game this year. They don't have you playing in the game if you don't get a stat. Had 7 SP teams tackle.

That would be worse for him because he'd have played 11 games without a single stat.

19 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

That would be worse for him because he'd have played 11 games without a single stat.

And as we all know, stats are the only thing that matters.  Especially for a first year Canadian playing exclusively special teams.  They might as well just cut him now, another failed project.

1 hour ago, brett_c_b said:

He's only being consistent. He is the one who kept insisting on making arguments based on data from cflcapgeek despite everyone knowing it's wrong. Not even worth reading his posts/rants

I have no axe to grind with you. However, your boat & fishing tackle is all set to go. Don't forget your lures on the dock. The motor is all gassed up. Have a good day trolling.

Edited by iso_55

46 minutes ago, iso_55 said:

Oh hello, Mr 137 Posts. Did you come out of your cave to see if the groundhog was right?? Wi Fi not working?

No needs to talk down to someone because of their "inferior post count". I don't post that often, but I'm on here almost day and consider myself a pretty knowledgeable fan. Many others are in the same category as me. Lots of people read but don't post, lots of people can't be here every day but still know what they're talking about, and lots of knowledgeable fans also post frequently -- which is cool, too!

Unless of course post count is all that matters around here?

1 hour ago, comedygeek said:

No needs to talk down to someone because of their "inferior post count". I don't post that often, but I'm on here almost day and consider myself a pretty knowledgeable fan. Many others are in the same category as me. Lots of people read but don't post, lots of people can't be here every day but still know what they're talking about, and lots of knowledgeable fans also post frequently -- which is cool, too!

Unless of course post count is all that matters around here?

You know, I had deleted that post but you quoted it before it was gone. So you caught me but whatever as what's done is done. I don't even know who brett_c_b is yet he took a swipe at me. His reference to CFL Cap Geek is funny because if he really understood, he'd have known that even I agree that the stats on that site were wrong once I got to know the place. The numbers shown weren't consistent. Mike pointed that out as did others (& I agreed) they were correct after reading what they had to say. That was over 6 months ago. That was it, a couple of non descript posts yet I'm criticized for quoting that site half a year later.

The other thing is yeah, I know  post counts shouldn't matter on the surface other than it shows certain people more than others like posting here. However, the more people who post here, the greater this place will be. Look at this site compared to Our Bombers with the amount of activity here compared to there. There can be days or even weeks where posts go unanswered. That isn't the case here & the activity here is on the upswing.

If it's just about drive bys, hate, anger or disrespect directed towards others when people disagree then this place will go the same way as other CFL sites that have died or been discontinued because of the same thing. Places like CFL Zone (extinct) & 13thman (life support).

Ask any of the mods here & they'll say they need all members to make a site great. Ones like myself, TUP & a few others who do post a lot & the ones that don't.  They'd also say that we may not agree but we should at least try to get along.

Edited by iso_55

57 minutes ago, iso_55 said:

You know, I had deleted that post but you quoted it before it was gone. So you caught me but whatever as what's done is done. I don't even know who brett_c_b is yet he took a swipe at me. His reference to CFL Cap Geek is funny because if he really understood, he'd have known that even I agree that the stats on that site were wrong once I got to know the place. The numbers shown weren't consistent. Mike pointed that out as did others (& I agreed) they were correct after reading what they had to say. That was over 6 months ago. That was it, a couple of non descript posts yet I'm criticized for quoting that site half a year later.

The other thing is yeah, I know  post counts shouldn't matter on the surface other than it shows certain people more than others like posting here. However, the more people who post here, the greater this place will be. Look at this site compared to Our Bombers with the amount of activity here compared to there. There can be days or even weeks where posts go unanswered. That isn't the case here & the activity here is on the upswing.

If it's just about drive bys, hate, anger or disrespect directed towards others when people disagree then this place will go the same way as other CFL sites that have died or been discontinued because of the same thing. Places like CFL Zone (extinct) & 13thman (life support).

Ask any of the mods here & they'll say they need all members to make a site great. Ones like myself, TUP & a few others who do post a lot & the ones that don't.  They'd also say that we may not agree but we should at least try to get along.

I had no problem with your criticism of his criticism -- I just thought it was a weak shot that, as someone who has a similar post count to his (even though I was a regular for years on OB and was one of the first members to sign up on MBB) but feels just as part of this site and the discussions and the fandom as anyone else.

Discussion is important, but why should I post more if I have nothing constructive to add? I try to only post when I feel something that hasn't yet been said needs to be said -- otherwise I'll just like posts that express what I would've said already. There's a lot of people here that I agree with much of the time, who often get to things before I do, so there's no sense in repeating things.

Plus, even lurkers and infrequent posters still bring pageviews and ad views, keeping the site running. Of course, there'd be no pages to view without good posts and replies to begin with, but we're all important cogs in the Winnipeg Blue Bombers fan community and Morning Big Blue!

(I didn't purposefully mean to catch it our out you before you deleted/edited it -- I just happened to see it and felt I needed to add my 2 cents.)

3 hours ago, TBURGESS said:

That would be worse for him because he'd have played 11 games without a single stat.

I know the likelihood of you scoffing at this is high, but I just wanted to bring up the fact that he didn't play a position on special teams that is meant to be making tackles. He was primarily playing what I'd call, for lack of a better term, the L5 spot on kick coverage and really the only time he'd be doing anything other than lane contain in that role is if the gunner blows a tackle and there's an opening down the sideline. Not every player on ST is out there to make the tackle. What you're doing is similar to accusing the offensive guard of being no good because he didn't get enough touchdowns. 

46 minutes ago, comedygeek said:

I had no problem with your criticism of his criticism -- I just thought it was a weak shot that, as someone who has a similar post count to his (even though I was a regular for years on OB and was one of the first members to sign up on MBB) but feels just as part of this site and the discussions and the fandom as anyone else.

Discussion is important, but why should I post more if I have nothing constructive to add? I try to only post when I feel something that hasn't yet been said needs to be said -- otherwise I'll just like posts that express what I would've said already. There's a lot of people here that I agree with much of the time, who often get to things before I do, so there's no sense in repeating things.

Plus, even lurkers and infrequent posters still bring pageviews and ad views, keeping the site running. Of course, there'd be no pages to view without good posts and replies to begin with, but we're all important cogs in the Winnipeg Blue Bombers fan community and Morning Big Blue!

(I didn't purposefully mean to catch it our out you before you deleted/edited it -- I just happened to see it and felt I needed to add my 2 cents.)

Your first sentence paragraph was correct which is why I deleted it. You're right.

11 hours ago, Atomic said:

And as we all know, stats are the only thing that matters.  Especially for a first year Canadian playing exclusively special teams.  They might as well just cut him now, another failed project.

That's not what I'm saying at all. I don't think he's a bust or a star. If he played all 18 games and only had 7 SP tackles, then he's not a solid special teamer. It's that simple.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.