...figured this deserved its own thread. As per twitter, Kevin Glenn is now a member of the Montreal Alouettes....

How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy?

 

I've held his hands before....you don't know...you can't prove anything!

Nice try.....

How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy?

Sorry, that was a nasty nate gem, I couldn't resist.

Nate always contended that the reason Glenn couldn't play in cold weather was because his hands were too small to grip the football when they got cold.

I have no idea if it's fact or not but based on past performance, one could make the argument.

Sadly there are those that wish to believe that black players can't play in the cold as well. Just an unfortunate reality that rascism remains a serious problem in today's society.

Glenn will make Montreal better for sure - and with that defense should be good for a win. That's all they may need is one win if B.C. can't get it done. Not worried at all about us - we're done

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

Last few games Nichols has been pretty bad actually. Over throws and just happy feet all the time. Thing MB is the problem but when your QB can't throw a pass to save his life ..

 

The amount of Glenn detractors out there always surprises me. The closest we have come to replacing Glenn since he left is Willy, and Drew has yet to prove to me that he is even "as good" as Glenn was in his prime, never mind better.

Willy is already better than Glenn ever was and that's including 2007.

 

lol, no Willy still has to show a little bit more to be as good as a prime Glenn from 2005 - 2012.

 

Glenns tiny hands in the cold and rain would have been even worse than Nichols performance.

You know what they say about guys with small hands...

 

 

They wear small gloves...

 

How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy?

Sorry, that was a nasty nate gem, I couldn't resist.

Nate always contended that the reason Glenn couldn't play in cold weather was because his hands were too small to grip the football when they got cold.

I have no idea if it's fact or not but based on past performance, one could make the argument.

 

Why are we even discussing that dipshit Nate? Go on Riderfans to see what he thinks of the Bombers & Winnipeg in general. 

Well, Nate has to suck up to Rider fans......at this stage of his posting life....he has nowhere else to go.....

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

It was a first game after two practices. Lets wait until next game to pass judgement.

 

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

It was a first game after two practices. Lets wait until next game to pass judgement.

 

I seem to recall Glenn saying that it would only take him a day or to to learn a new playbook.  Seems he might have been a little off in his estimate.  I'd agree with you except for the fact that Glenn looked a lot like this during his time with Saskatchewan.  He's well past his best before date and it really shows, practices not withstanding.

Glenns stats would have looked a lot better if his receivers had caught the ball they way they usually do. Probably wouldn't have changed the outcome though because Hamilton is a way better team than Montreal this year.

Glenns stats would have looked a lot better if his receivers had caught the ball they way they usually do. Probably wouldn't have changed the outcome though because Hamilton is a way better team than Montreal this year.

 

The Mtl. O-line did Glenn no favours either, giving him very little time to get rid of the ball.  Either the Ti-Cats pass rush is unstoppable or the Mtl. O-line has declined big time from the days of Calvillo.

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. 

 

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. 

 

 

I don't know - he wasn't terrible but really, two days of practice and he starts. QBing must really be an issue in Montreal. Is Crompton hurt again? May have missed some stuff as only concentrating on bombers and eskie news right now. 

 

 

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. 

 

 

I don't know - he wasn't terrible but really, two days of practice and he starts. QBing must really be an issue in Montreal. Is Crompton hurt again? May have missed some stuff as only concentrating on bombers and eskie news right now. 

 

 

Montreal put him on the 6 game list on Sept 30th.

 

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. 

 

Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. 

 

Yes, because the circumstances between Winnipeg and Montreal were exactly the same, right?  And in any case, a loss is a loss is a loss, so the fact that they rushed Glenn out there lead to exactly the same result as us not rushing Nichols into action.  Dang that relentless logic.  Always getting in the way.

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.

Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn.

Yes, because the circumstances between Winnipeg and Montreal were exactly the same, right?  And in any case, a loss is a loss is a loss, so the fact that they rushed Glenn out there lead to exactly the same result as us not rushing Nichols into action.  Dang that relentless logic.  Always getting in the way.

Exactly lol. He looked horrible cuz he had minimal reps with offense. Just like nichols woulda with minimal reps. If we did throw him into the breech, the same complainers would say we set him up to fail or hes obviously garbage, etc etc.. There is no winning with some posters here..

 

 

 

 

So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.

So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.

Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn.

Yes, because the circumstances between Winnipeg and Montreal were exactly the same, right?  And in any case, a loss is a loss is a loss, so the fact that they rushed Glenn out there lead to exactly the same result as us not rushing Nichols into action.  Dang that relentless logic.  Always getting in the way.

Exactly lol. He looked horrible cuz he had minimal reps with offense. Just like nichols woulda with minimal reps. If we did throw him into the breech, the same complainers would say we set him up to fail or hes obviously garbage, etc etc.. There is no winning with some posters here..

 

No, the point I'm making was that there was some suggestion that because Glenn was sent in with minimal reps, that that somehow makes him better/superior than Nichols.  But clearly, when looking at the results, it neither supports nor refutes the argument.  

What's the excuse for Glenn going to be when he struggles again this week? 

What's the excuse for Glenn going to be when he struggles again this week?

Mercury is in retrograde

Some irony in Glenn and his struggles was that it was cold and snowing also