Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

If I was an Elks fan, having Ford as the starter would drive me nuts. His play at qb is all over the place. There's no consistency, rhyme or reason to how he plays qb. Ford makes an outstanding play that takes 18 seconds to run as he makes chicken salad out of chicken feathers. But for every 1 big play he makes, he makes 5 lousy ones. Just watching him, it's all based on athletic ability & not on football smarts. I think by mid season, he'll be sitting again & Fajardo the starter with the Elks at 1-8 or 2-7.

Ford won't have any receivers left by season's end.

Ford looks more like Tyrie Adams than a guy ready for the #1 job, he either doesn't fully understand the strategic purpose of the routes his receivers are running or can't commit to the play being called.  Similar to his brother he seems to have a semi-focus on the play and over relies on his athleticism, which makes everything look like sandlot.

12 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

If I was an Elks fan, having Ford as the starter would drive me nuts. His play at qb is all over the place. There's no consistency, rhyme or reason to how he plays qb. Ford makes an outstanding play that takes 18 seconds to run as he makes chicken salad out of chicken feathers. But for every 1 big play he makes, he makes 5 lousy ones. Just watching him, it's all based on athletic ability & not on football smarts. I think by mid season, he'll be sitting again & Fajardo the starter with the Elks at 1-8 or 2-7.

Ford won't have any receivers left by season's end.

Ford looks more like Tyrie Adams than a guy ready for the #1 job, he either doesn't fully understand the strategic purpose of the routes his receivers are running or can't commit to the play being called.  Similar to his brother he seems to have a semi-focus on the play and over relies on his athleticism, which makes everything look like sandlot.

Posted
Just now, Fatty Liver said:

Ford looks more like Tyrie Adams than a guy ready for the #1 job, he either doesn't fully understand the strategic purpose of the routes his receivers are running or can't commit to the play being called.  Similar to his brother he seems to have a semi-focus on the play and over relies on his athleticism, which makes everything look like sandlot.

 Not to mention having an underwhelming receiving corps...doest help...no real legit game breaker

And did i see that right...B.C was rolling a 4 import oline?? 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Booch said:

 Not to mention having an underwhelming receiving corps...doest help...no real legit game breaker

And did i see that right...B.C was rolling a 4 import oline?? 

They did. Is chungh hurt?

Posted
1 hour ago, Booch said:

 Not to mention having an underwhelming receiving corps...doest help...no real legit game breaker

And did i see that right...B.C was rolling a 4 import oline?? 

Where's the great Sukh Chungh? 

2 hours ago, Booch said:

 Not to mention having an underwhelming receiving corps...doest help...no real legit game breaker

And did i see that right...B.C was rolling a 4 import oline?? 

Gittens could have signed with us. Or stayed in Toronto. he'll be lucky to break 500 yards in Edmonton. Even with a game breaker I doubt it would make much of a difference. With Ford in there running wild & improvising that whole offense is a cluster****. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Nolby said:

He didnt target his head at all, you could see the Lions db put his right shoulder out and collided with the chest of the Elks receiver. The collision itself knocked the helmets off, not from a targeting.

I don't know what game you saw last night but that was or nearly was a helmet to helmet hit. If the DB did use his shoulder it was right at or near the head. Rough play was the right call. In this era of football, that's called every time. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Bigblue204 said:

They did. Is chungh hurt?

Yeah I was wondering..must be..he still there correct? Or was? 

 

3 hours ago, Atomic said:

He is a free agent, maybe done with football. David Foucault and Anu Una are injured.

Ahh...explains that absence then

 

1 hour ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Where's the great Sukh Chungh? 

Gittens could have signed with us. Or stayed in Toronto. he'll be lucky to break 500 yards in Edmonton. Even with a game breaker I doubt it would make much of a difference. With Ford in there running wild & improvising that whole offense is a cluster****. 

Yeah...Ford is more a gimmick guy than people claimed Strev was

Ford may have a few games where he wins..mainly from running around and getting lucky shots with guys busting coverage to cheat on the scrambling...but I don't see him being anything better than a .500 QB

1 hour ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

I don't know what game you saw last night but that was or nearly was a helmet to helmet hit. If the DB did use his shoulder it was right at or near the head. Rough play was the right call. In this era of football, that's called every time. 

Awe in typical fashion was doing...or trying to do that as well but missed..

Posted
3 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

If you pause the video at the time of the hit you can see it's helmet to helmet. The Lions get called for rough play & they celebrate a head shot on X. 

Disagree. It's shoulder to chest first. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

Disagree. It's shoulder to chest first. 

hit.jpg

Contact with the head first IMO but it's almost simultaneous.  Williams right shoulder is chin level at the moment of contact but comes down to chest level as he is exploding through.  The receiver did duck into it a bit so I'm not sure what else Williams could have done.

Posted

My 2 cents

 

Rourke while I get nauseated listening to TSN talk about him....he did play well; he looked better than he did last year....Next week will say a lot about Rourke IMO...hopefully we bring him crashing down to earth and the turf

Ford is not a QB, he is a great athlete and can "sandlot" with the best of them.....the only time he looked like a QB was when he was like 10 yards back and rolled out to the wide side......not sustainable

Betts gifted Edm. most of their early offensive numbers.....He is quick, I will give him that, but dude you ain't catching Tre Ford....but stubborn is as stubborn does he kept trying and failing miserably allowing ford an unobstructed easy rollout.....I still say Betts has a great motor and is really quick but the guy just can't contain or be patient against the run....His career so far is one trick pony

I am happy for Buck to get his first win....I just hope his second win is at least a couple weeks away.....

 

Posted
1 hour ago, bigg jay said:

hit.jpg

Contact with the head first IMO but it's almost simultaneous.  Williams right shoulder is chin level at the moment of contact but comes down to chest level as he is exploding through.  The receiver did duck into it a bit so I'm not sure what else Williams could have done.

TSN producers really didn't want to bother showing any good replays of that hit.

Issue for tackler here is hit vs form.  You launch yourself into a guys upper body in this era you're probably taking a penalty.  You dive at his knee/shins without the guy having a chance to react, you're getting a penalty.  So make a tackle with your chest plate and a wrap.

The launch here is the real problem.  And any head contact is called.  Doesn't matter at all what touched first or where the target was.

Posted
2 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

TSN producers really didn't want to bother showing any good replays of that hit.

Issue for tackler here is hit vs form.  You launch yourself into a guys upper body in this era you're probably taking a penalty.  You dive at his knee/shins without the guy having a chance to react, you're getting a penalty.  So make a tackle with your chest plate and a wrap.

The launch here is the real problem.  And any head contact is called.  Doesn't matter at all what touched first or where the target was.

That doesn't seem to make its way into the pro leagues for some.

Posted

Initial contact matters, but any hit to the head is in the rule book, so I take my complaint back. 

Quote
  1. Using the helmet as the initial or primary point of contact to butt, ram, spear, or deliver a blow to an opponent who is in a vulnerable position, including but not limited to, a passer, a receiver in the act of catching a pass, a ball carrier in the grasp of another tackler or a ball carrier on the playing surface not attempting to advance,

    NOTE: The expanded definitions of butt, ram and spear are:

    Butt: When a player suddenly and quickly moves their head to strike an opponent with their helmet or face mask.

    Ram: When a player who is in motion and on their feet uses their helmet as the primary point of contact to deliver a blow to an opponent. If the facemask is the initial point of contact on the opponent, it shall not be a penalty under this rule.

    Spear: When a player uses the top of their helmet as the primary point of contact to deliver a blow to an opponent.

  2. Delivering a blow to an opponent in the neck or head,
Posted
56 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Bottom line Ford was serving up suicide passes to his receivers... he better figure his **** out before he gets someone killed.

He’s just straight up not a starting QB in this league. Par that with an average st best receiving core, I think offensively the Elks are going to be in tough again this season. 

Posted (edited)

Betts vs. Ford was kind of the perfect storm of Suitor hype.  Two massively talented Canadians who get by on their athleticism chasing each other around the field...

Edited by johnzo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...