wbbfan Posted 22 hours ago Author Report Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, sweep the leg said: That was my takeaway as well. The first hit that Wilson took was his fault. He needs to process what’s happening faster. I thought the 4th stringer’s arm looked good. Looked to me like he had zip on the ball throwing to the sideline. He should have had a td pass but Wallis got jammed at the line and was a step behind. The ball was in the perfect spot if Wallis gets a better release. Like our 4 QBs. Chase should sit on the pr and get time down there until elgersma comes available any way. sweep the leg 1
Fatty Liver Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago (edited) 13 hours ago, sweep the leg said: That was my takeaway as well. The first hit that Wilson took was his fault. He needs to process what’s happening faster. I thought the 4th stringer’s arm looked good. Looked to me like he had zip on the ball throwing to the sideline. He should have had a td pass but Wallis got jammed at the line and was a step behind. The ball was in the perfect spot if Wallis gets a better release. Agree, Chase Artopeus had that Dru Brown vibe, cool and intelligent, maybe not as physically gifted as Wilson but almost surpassed him in effectiveness in one set of downs. They need to keep him around on the PR to evaluate whether he has real potential to develop or if he's just a gifted improviser that can get by faking it for awhile. Edited 11 hours ago by Fatty Liver Blue-urns, Arnold_Palmer, Tracker and 1 other 2 2
Fatty Liver Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 6 hours ago, Noeller said: First off, **** the Riders and their ignorant redneck fans. Second, Osh says won't be a problem to keep an American RB like Cooley. That's helpful. Third, my goodness I love the CFL and am so excited to listen to a game again. Will watch the CFL+ replay tomorrow. Summer is here... Very excited for what I think is going to be a very good Bombers D. Hoping the O can be at least "decent" and we'll be a real "tough out" in 2025... Cooley might have to spend time on the PR biding his time waiting for a chance that might never come, Peterson already looks quite capable of backing up Brady, so it comes down to ratio. I'd love to see Pigrome and Cooley on the field at the same time, that would be fun.
do or die Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago New guys: 1. Cooley......yeah the ratio, but another game like that, and he will have to be kept. 2. Artopoeous......nice pocket instinct, good reads, ball out on time. 3. Evan......punter, with some actual leg. Vets: 1. Adams......need more impact plays from interior, and he looks like the man for the job. 2. Strev......looked good standing in the pocket, and slinging the ball. 3. Ayers.....dude popped out on the screen, at LB, a number of times Like: The blitzing and pressure packages on D. None of that Tim Burke crap All the QBs looking pretty good in the pocket No like: Kick returns and coverage (sigh) Some of the receivers.......poor releases, poor pattern running, poor catching. rebusrankin, Super Duper Negatron, Piggy 1 and 1 other 2 2
MrFreakzilla Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 12 hours ago, Brandon said: Demond Washington? Stoudamire? McDuffie? That's the list? Thanks for making my point 13 hours ago, HardCoreBlue said: Did not know that. Good to know. Means absolutely nothing.
Doublezero Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 13 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Funny thing about the complaining about kick returns as some kind of franchise curse is we have the most total return TD's and fewest return TD's scored on us among CFL teams in the past 10 CFL seasons. I agree, kick/punt cover and returns are not a curse for us. But for one side of the equation - most TDs scored - I'd venture to say this is because we had Janarion Grant in Blue & Gold from 2019 to 2023. And if you look at total yards gained on kick and punt returns since we let Grant get away, Bombers are just about the worst in the league. This, despite the fact we force opponents to kick to us more often than virtually every other team - credit our defence for forcing those 3rd down punts. Really, that is an opportunity squandered: more punts coming to us, but among fewest yards gained. Bomber fans see this intuitively - we are getting lots of chances to return the ball but often losing the overall field position battle. Piggy 1, BigBlueFanatic and BBlink 2 1
Goalie Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 15 hours ago, MrFreakzilla said: 1. Jake Thomas. I missed the start of the game due to the CFL website being trash but I'm sure J.T was as always the best player on the field. 2. Our punter/holder. 5 for 5 on field goal holds. When you hold that well does it really matter how well you punt? Ask coach O'Shea he'll tell ya. 3. Our kick return/coverage. Terrible, terrible, terrible. Who's the last dangerous returner that we as an organization found? Grant was released from another CFL team and so was Stokes. Unacceptable Happy Honker goes to the Riders...F*ck all of you, we hate you all. You suck. And even though this game had all the intensity of a book signing. It's always nice to beat them. Unhappy honker goes to those who didn't get the memo about the team name. We're the BLUE Bombers. Not the Stumps or Red Blacks. Wear the right coloured gear or get a bus ticket out of the city. The only players in my opinion who can wear whatever they want is Castillo, Brady, Zach, Willie and Big Stan. The rest don't even have the option. Go Blue! Let's beat them again next weekend. Evans was holding fgs also.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, Doublezero said: I agree, kick/punt cover and returns are not a curse for us. But for one side of the equation - most TDs scored - I'd venture to say this is because we had Janarion Grant in Blue & Gold from 2019 to 2023. And if you look at total yards gained on kick and punt returns since we let Grant get away, Bombers are just about the worst in the league. This, despite the fact we force opponents to kick to us more often than virtually every other team - credit our defence for forcing those 3rd down punts. Really, that is an opportunity squandered: more punts coming to us, but among fewest yards gained. Bomber fans see this intuitively - we are getting lots of chances to return the ball but often losing the overall field position battle. Yeah yeah. The feelings are hard. Whole league is within 3 yards net on punts last season, 36-39 yards. Everyone right around 10-11 yards per return, difference is a team like Toronto with Grant having a big play return every other game on average. Edmonton 6 yards ahead of anyone else on net punting last year, but also highest net against. Net exchange, barely positive. Sask punted 25 times more than us last season, us and BC punting significantly less. Yeah you want to be best in the league, but it's not like we have some giant deficiency. We need a returner. Piggy 1, johnzo, Noeller and 1 other 2 2
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Yeah yeah. The feelings are hard. Whole league is within 3 yards net on punts last season, 36-39 yards. Everyone right around 10-11 yards per return, difference is a team like Toronto with Grant having a big play return every other game on average. Edmonton 6 yards ahead of anyone else on net punting last year, but also highest net against. Net exchange, barely positive. Sask punted 25 times more than us last season, us and BC punting significantly less. Yeah you want to be best in the league, but it's not like we have some giant deficiency. We need a returner. Net punt is deceiving tho...how many times have u seen a punter kick from between the 20 and 30 right out of scoring range...and our punter guy gets it to midfield...who cares if the net is on par when u still giving up instant scoring position...happened way too often last yr And they said hey..hey never kicked a single...prob cause he needed to be kicking from their 40 to get it there in endzone...so big whip..and how many games have we seen those extra 1..2 points being the difference or reason for a win...a ton So what the odd time u get the single and Piggy 1 and wbbfan 2
Fatty Liver Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 27 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Yeah yeah. The feelings are hard. Whole league is within 3 yards net on punts last season, 36-39 yards. Everyone right around 10-11 yards per return, difference is a team like Toronto with Grant having a big play return every other game on average. Edmonton 6 yards ahead of anyone else on net punting last year, but also highest net against. Net exchange, barely positive. Sask punted 25 times more than us last season, us and BC punting significantly less. Yeah you want to be best in the league, but it's not like we have some giant deficiency. We need a returner. Logan is among the most dynamic returners in the CFL, his problem is staying healthy. At one time the Stamps had Kadeem Carey, Dedrick Mills and Logan as backup, but they were rarely healthy at the same time so their running game never dominated like they could have with all that talent. wbbfan 1
wbbfan Posted 2 hours ago Author Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Booch said: Net punt is deceiving tho...how many times have u seen a punter kick from between the 20 and 30 right out of scoring range...and our punter guy gets it to midfield...who cares if the net is on par when u still giving up instant scoring position...happened way too often last yr And they said hey..hey never kicked a single...prob cause he needed to be kicking from their 40 to get it there in endzone...so big whip..and how many games have we seen those extra 1..2 points being the difference or reason for a win...a ton So what the odd time u get the single and He has a disproportionate amount of shanks from deep in our end that give instant field goal range. 49 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: Logan is among the most dynamic returners in the CFL, his problem is staying healthy. At one time the Stamps had Kadeem Carey, Dedrick Mills and Logan as backup, but they were rarely healthy at the same time so their running game never dominated like they could have with all that talent. Yep, we need a kr stop gap. Logan will be an excellent kr when healthy. We need a guy who runs up, catches and every ball possible, goes north south and gets consistently decent yards. I think vaval should be that guy. I’m also not at all against using our by week and this week to try out guys for a worst case scenario. I think we need wr talent more than kr right now. Both ni and imp. We should be getting ready to go through other teams cuts really well. I haven’t seen any thing from the rookie imo wrs that even looks like in a year they might be good. rebusrankin 1
Goalie Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Hall looked like he had some chemistry with Zach and chemistry with Zach is important, honestly prob more important than other factors. If there’s 2 open spots you go with the 2 Zach likes best. Pretty simple. Edited 1 hour ago by Goalie
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now