Jump to content

US Politics


Rich

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Only the most hardcore of alt right trumpologists, those that embrace the white nationalist nonsense could look at JT's remarks and Trumps (and his admin) and think Trump was in the right at JT was in the wrong.

It exposes the trump supporters.  Its like he said, he could shoot a guy in times square.  And his supporters would blame the victim for ruining a good bullet.

I want strength not weakness and not globalism, trendy socialism and cultural marxism. I want my country put FIRST.

"The historic and important agreement we all reached at Charlevoix will help make our economies stronger, ournpeople more prosperous, protect our environment and protect the rights of women and girls right around the world. THATS WHAT MATTERS.

This is the man you want in a negotiation with someone as strong anda country as powerful as the USA ?

This is the man weve entrusted our economic well being to?

A comedy sketch, if it wasnt so achingly pathetic and real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zontar said:

I want strength not weakness and not globalism, trendy socialism and cultural marxism. I want my country put FIRST.

"The historic and important agreement we all reached at Charlevoix will help make our economies stronger, ournpeople more prosperous, protect our environment and protect the rights of women and girls right around the world. THATS WHAT MATTERS.

This is the man you want in a negotiation with someone as strong anda country as powerful as the USA ?

This is the man weve entrusted our economic well being to?

A comedy sketch, if it wasnt so achingly pathetic and real.

One has nothing to do with the other.  You're under the mistaken impression I support JT.  I do not.

But no matter how right wing I might be, racist divisive rhetoric and imbecilic buffoonery is a red line for my support.  I cannot share White Nationalist values.  Im sorry it's not the same for you.

And if I DID support Trump, I would not be so blinded by my own obsession to think his remarks and those of his admin were reasonable.  I'd think back to my Kindergarten education where we learned insults and bully tactics were rude and inappropriate.  Trump might have missed kindergarten. 

And regardless of how much I dislike JT, I'd show some respect to the office he holds and accept the fact that his remarks were perfectly appropriate and every Canadian should be outraged that the US would invoke a national security lie that was only previously used against Libya and Iran. 

Whoops, there goes my common sense again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Zontar said:

Trudeau has professed his love and admiration for Cuba and China. Obama and Cuba, Obamas sweetheart deal with iran, bows to king of saudi arabia

 Funny, how moral outrage can be so selective.

So are you saying that you will set a great example for everyone by expressing your outrage over Trump's dealings with NK?  Or are you exhibiting selective moral outrage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zontar said:

Doesnt answer the question. Where is outrage then. If it isnt there its selective and therefore meaningless if you want to stake out the moral highground.

Ummm plenty of people were outraged.  What the heck does it have to do with anything?

Its racist white nationalist supporters that are being selective by demanding outrage over Obama and praising Trump?  Hypocrite much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

So are you saying that you will set a great example for everyone by expressing your outrage over Trump's dealings with NK?  Or are you exhibiting selective moral outrage?

If it were up to me Trump would have NK on its knees.

But it was mere months ago, the establishment media, liberals, globalists were wailing over how  Trump was too hard on them, risking nuclear war.  Trump eases the supposed tensions and he now has to apologize for that? C'mon, pick one.

Edited by Zontar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zontar said:

If it were up to me Trump would have NK on its knees.

But it was mere months ago, the establishment media, liberals, globalists were wailing over how  Trump was too hard on them, risking nuclear war.  Trump eases the supposed tensions and he now has to apologize for that? C'mon, pick one.

There is a lot of middle ground between ignorant saber-rattling rhetoric and fellatio.  Im sorry you insist on only those two choices.

Also, you didnt answer the question.  Are you being a morally selective hypocrite or are you wildly outraged over Trump on NK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, do or die said:

And as soon as Kim doesnt comply, Trump will say   1) he knew it from the moment he met him and was just playing him and     2) we wouldnt be in this mess if OBAMA and     3) What about Hilary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

There is a lot of middle ground between ignorant saber-rattling rhetoric and fellatio.  Im sorry you insist on only those two choices.

Also, you didnt answer the question.  Are you being a morally selective hypocrite or are you wildly outraged over Trump on NK?

Your real, genuine and profound concern for human rights of the people of NK is touching.

 I can barely wait to scroll back in this thread and read your praise for Trump and his former hardline policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zontar said:

Your real, genuine and profound concern for human rights of the people of NK is touching.

 I can barely wait to scroll back in this thread and read your praise for Trump and his former hardline policy.

1) you still havent answered

2) Why so defensive?

3) I JUST wrote, in the comment you quoted how there is a lot of middle ground.  I didn't claim I disliked one and loved the other.  That would be the example I used to describe you.  There is also a difference between talking tough and being an idiot.  I generally like tough talk on vile dictators.  Most Trump supporters are VERY defensive which is why they are unwilling to ever give an inch, even on racism.  Sadly, it only emboldens the base.

As for caring about NK, it doesnt impact my life.  But as a human inhabitant of the Earth, I'd usually come down on the side of the people being starved, murdered and subjugated rather then the fat dicatator.  Granted, I dont think about it very often.  But when I do, that's usually a pretty easy choice.

LOL

Edited by The Unknown Poster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KJU got a lot done yesterday, Russia and China talking sanction reduction and SK and Japan less protected, and of course plenty of pictures with the old senile dotard that he scammed yesterday, NK will never get rid of their nukes, all they will say is they got rid of them and Trump will believe him because they trust each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

 

Appreciate you admitted ,normally,  you couldnt care less about NK.

Trump makes people claim, suddenly , they really care about things. Coincidently, the same things Trump involves himself with.

 

 

Edited by Zontar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zontar said:

if it were up to me Trump would have NK on its knees.

The only way Trump can bring someone to their knees is with a large cash payment in a truck stop mens room. 

The guy is a pansy of a leader, which is why he tries to chum around with dictators, he figures if he associates with these people then he'll be seen as strong too. The reality is that he's a blubbering weak fool that no one takes seriously. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zontar said:

Doesnt answer the question. Where is outrage then. If it isnt there its selective and therefore meaningless if you want to stake out the moral highground.

Exactly, Obama would have already received the Nobel Peace Prize if he had pulled this off. 

Hard to believe people can be so invested in their own politics that it even Trumps common sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

And as soon as Kim doesnt comply, Trump will say   1) he knew it from the moment he met him and was just playing him and     2) we wouldnt be in this mess if OBAMA and     3) What about Hilary.

...in other words....that ole 4D Chess..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no consultation with military needed .

Quote

 

President Donald Trump's announcement Tuesday that he had agreed to cancel war games in Korea reportedly came as a shock to South Korea and U.S. military leaders. 

U.S. Forces in Korea "has received no updated guidance on execution or cessation of training exercises," said USFK spokeswoman Lieutenant Colonel Jennifer Lovett, Reuters reported.

Lovett said, as of now, the U.S. military plans to "continue with our current military posture until we receive updated guidance" from the Department of Defense or Indo-Pacific Command. This includes the Ulchi Freedom Guardian joint military exercises scheduled for the fall. 

 

 

World's most powerful military, top level people who have trained for their entire careers to operate it.

Trump, who ducked military draft, doesn't need any of them.

USA being run by an impulsive person who makes decisions entirely on spur of the moment feelings, and thoughts about what will benefit him.

This guy isn't going to jail, he's going for mandatory six months rest and recuperation at "Pink Mountain".

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...