Jump to content

blue85gold

Members
  • Posts

    1,238
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by blue85gold

  1. 2 minutes ago, ShyGuy said:

    So wtf happens if Brady gets dinged or Demski can't make it work?!?

    I assume if Demski can't go, they add Peterson back on. 

    Chris-Ike would be the back up plan for Brady. 

    Razor thin depth on O if you can even call it depth

    9 minutes ago, Atomic said:

    https://static.cfl.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/WINNIPEG-AT-MONTREAL_NOVEMBER-1-1.pdf

    Demski GTD

    No backup RB dressed (MCI backs up I guess?)

    Corcoran starting over Clercius 

    KMB stays on at DE but Person is out

    Woods on the roster but not starting

    Dexter Lawson backing up at SAM 

    Wilson Sterns Wheatfall Demski/Cobb Corcoran starting receivers

    Brutal that neither of the american DEs that looked great last week get a chance. 

    Don't know why we need Ayers and Lawson on the roster at all as back ups really. 

  2. 43 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

    I'm with Booch, go Wilson/Clercius/Wheatfall/Sterns/Echols at WR and declare two nationals on D. Lawson/Kramdi/Smith/Thomas et all can cover things. I do bet we either play a hobbled Demski or go Corcoran/Cobb as the 2nd starter.

    I agree would be great if we can. Issue isn’t the number of starters but getting another American on the roster. Don’t know about it at the expense of the dline. Griffin might be health too, would be nice to get him back on D

  3. Like the look of the D actually.  Hope the young DEs show well and we can see Shay and Smith get some reps. 

    Resting who they did makes sense for the most part. Either young guy who is our only hope to win in the playoffs (Vaval, BO, Pokey) or old guys that could use a rest (Zach, Bryant, Willie and Vaughters). 

    I do wonder if they aren't happy with Person's play and are auditioning the other young DEs.

  4. 34 minutes ago, bigg jay said:

    The Stamps starting cleaning house almost immediately after the season their was over (Killam, Monson & Simpsons were turfed less than a week after their last game) because they were willing to make necessary changes - I don't see MOS being willing to do the same but we'll see.  

    Got to keep in mind which season you're talking about. They were 5-12-1 last year and 6-12 the year before.  Of course they were willing to make changes, only way Dave could keep his job after two terrible seasons. 

  5. 24 minutes ago, Tracker said:

    Collaros has not put together two good games back to back all year, so the odds are really stacked against us.

    This works out perfect.

    This week - good game - clinch playoff spot.

    Next game - bad game - no effect on standings

    Eastern semi - good game - win that one

    Eastern final - bad game - sneak out with a win because Vaval scores 3 return TDs

    Grey cup - good game we win

    Easy.

  6. 7 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

    Brazzell also played with teams that weren't the Bombers... and they weren't exactly the glory days of blue bombers football when he was here...

    I had forgot that Brazzell was around for years before he came here at the end of his career.  His most memorable play to me is running along with Milt on the 105 yard game winner.

    Just saw that his son, Chris Brazzell II, plays for Tennessee. Get him on the neg list!

  7. 9 minutes ago, Sard said:

    That was kinda my point originally, as much as their analytics are saying that the changes will add 60 TD per season, that's less than a TD per game (5.185 points per game), but they didn't take into account the number of field goals that won't be scored, so overall scoring will go down.  Even more if you take out missed field goal touchdowns as you suggest.

    I think they are using the increase in TDs as a way to try and justify the changes they wanted to make anyway, but they didn't actually do the math.  Sure, 60 TDs sounds impressive, but when you break it down per game, the argument falls apart.

    It is all made up math so it doesn't really matter, but we don't know specifically what they included or excluded.

×
×
  • Create New...