All Activity

Actually, not an unreasonable assumption.

I agree. Also, what sort of message when it send to other pending free-agents if the Bombers didn't re-sign Brady? Nice to see loyalty from the team towards a player that bleeds Blue and Gold.

I get the issue with how high Brady's salary is but this deal is not what is going to kill us. If we bring back Jefferson at $200,000, Schoen at $175,000+, Kyrie Wilson at whatever he makes, all three of Holm/Kramdi/Nichols (two are fine), Vaughters at $165,000, Jake and Kolo at any price, aging foot soldiers such as Gauthier and Hallet, Mitchell at $160,000 and J. Jones at whatever he got, that huge amount of deadwood and clinging to aging vets, that's what kills us.

Sex pest

Yeah I dunno man if that's worth it..and with it garuanteed in yr 3...for a then 31 yr old back who plays a physical game...big risk...hes already shown last few hes injury susceptible As @TBURGESS said...million bucks in a QB in serious decline..and a back who could fall of a cliff in 2027...just dont know...if its half marketing id be ok..but man..when u could fill that spot at 80k and get just as good production...that other 210k would go a long way

Definitely .....fake ...phony...artificial.....whatever it takes.....that's a fair size contract

I would think so. Hope we got a chunk of fake cap dollars too

Way too much for a RB. We've got a million bucks tied up in just two players. I don't want to hear any 'why can't we get big FA's again' whining this year.

Brady signing is a terrible albatross boat anchor of a contract. I hate the $ and length. Putrid. On the bright side I am happy to have Brady here and that this almost definitely means Hogan is out. If the contract is one third marketing money, or the SmS jumps by 30%, I can live with it, so I reserve the right to walk this back if that is the case. My issue is solely $ and a tiny bit length of contract (if there is guaranteed year 3 $) As it stands right now tho I don't believe this is a good contract. Love the player, hate the terms.

I doubt it.

I like Brady and am happy he is back. Plus you have to keep your talent and he's our best offensive player and best Canadian.

That 7-11 is in Riverview where I grew up. And when I was learning to drive nearly drove my dad's car INTO the store with him inside. But that's a story for another day.

Nah, I realized in my late 20's I wasn't good enough. With the loss of Patrick Mahomes, I wonder if the Chiefs will work out Elgersma as depth at the QB3 position?

It's a lot of money to be sure but it had to be done. I also expect the salary cap will be going up again this off season so there'll be wiggle room to afford Brady. Imagine the President, GM & HC all come back & Brady leaves? The optics would be so bad. I applaud Walters for getting it done. Credit where credit is due.

That is alot of money....hopefully marketing money takes a bite outta it, but So far I like the signings two of the three have been CDN and the 3rd a young guy with tons of potential...

New CBA brings that down to 7years starting in '26, so they better get a move on

Does this mean Hogan is officially gone?

Any way you slice it he wanted to play here, the Bombers wanted him back and he's going to get paid.

Only team who can give him 8 years tho. That matters. Quite the haul but not a fan of Rossi. He’s small as hell.

Demski next please. this is a great sign that change is occurring as Brady made it known that he wanted to win I mean $$$ but he wanted to win so him not even testing free agency like was rumoured, great sign change is happening.

I don't see how out of all of our players this guy couldn't qualify for the marketing money. I'd hope a good chunk is covered for marketing. 3 years for a guy in his prime that has "pardon the pun" carried the team over the last two seasons. Great signing.

Check the regular season discussion.

While it's great that he is back I'll be interested to hear what he'll be making per year.