Kelly looks like he did pre injury

Sucks to see Randolph that first Argo drive locking down right side of their oline...why we cut him...who knows

So guess Montreal and Toronto don’t have a D either ???

9 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

I stick to an opinion because my belief system tells me I'm right. I don't expect every Bomber receiver to get a thousand yards & I never said anything like that about Cobb. I do expect our receivers to work together as a unit making it difficult for defenses to cover them all completely. To me, Cobb is not a threat nor is he even a concern. We let Wheatfall & Stearns go & so far playing on teams with OC's not named Hogan, they look very good. Yeah, our passing attack is working but we're only as good as our weakest link. We also are thin at receiver with little depth. One or two injuries & we'll be in trouble like last season. We're fine as long as we're healthy. Think Cobb will step up if he is called upon? Maybe but I doubt it.

Check the stat sheet. That's literally what happened.

17 hours ago, Mike said:

… I feel like you stick to an opinion and you are literally just unable to process a different viewpoint. He’s not comparing Cobb to Lawler. He’s saying he’s our fifth option, other guys had huge games. Not every receiver is going to get 100 yards a game. Our offense is clicking and you’re bitching and whining that we didn’t invest into THREE free agent receiver big ticket items (and also somehow forgetting that you pretended we didn’t sign ANY)

Fifth option doesn't have to be dead weight and garner zero attention...also nobody said everyone needs to haul in 100 yard a a game..but a guy out there who draws extra coverage from your 1A and 1B receiver may allow those 2..or one of the others some days to go off..much like Lawler..that Canadian doofus who ate our lunch allowed wheatfall and mitchel..of all people be free to make plays on us at will

We used to run Lawler..Demski..Adams..Bailey..Woli...then had similar units with Schoen mixed in...where was the useless turd there doing absolutely nothing?

And when we ran out 5 recievers who made plays..ZC flourished..we were class of league and winning cups...until the issues now crept in..no depth..reliance on old ghys who just can't cut it no more..not allowing youth to get reps..ignoring rules...etc..etc..

On 2026-06-13 at 9:30 AM, Booch said:

So...keep the 3 best tackles around..what if one goes down

Also have the ability to make tough choices.. keep randloph where he was..slide broxton to LT and u could.have 6 gamed Bryant..Nationalized him and "start" him and then sub out with Randoplh..many ways

If one our tackles goes out with season ender..we hooped

He would have been fine at RG too seeing as we had the fixation witj 3 American oline guys...it was pretty much predetermined we were running 3 Canadian receievers before camp even opened...regardless if we had the talent to do so...even when some American rookies outperformed the incumbent Canadians...they were thrown on the PR..Another case of better player sitting for inferior...make that makes sense when its not even needed to

Randolphs only route to stay was PR when Tui wasnt game 1 starter. The fact that Randolph chose to leave tells me that Tui ain't capable of starting anytime soon

Edited yesterday at 07:48 PM1 day by GCn20

1 hour ago, Bigblue204 said:

Check the stat sheet. That's literally what happened.

What stat sheet? Give me Cobb's numbers after two games, then.

7 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

What stat sheet? Give me Cobb's numbers after two games, then.

4 hours ago, Mike said:

This is a wild sentence to type out when your belief system made you forget about Tim White and Tommy Nield.

No, I've already mentioned them in a positive light by posting that I believe that they'll be thousand yard receivers for us. I guess you conveniently forgot that. Or perhaps you didn't know. Maybe read EVERYTHING I post & stop just cherry picking me. Funny how I never do that to you. I even press "Like" every once in awhile when you post something. You know, I've tried to get along with you but you're not interested in ending this feud. Therefore, no longer care what you think.

Just now, HardCoreBlue said:

Ha, ha. That just about sums it up. BTW, for BigBlue 204 who asked me to check the stats sheet, here's Cobb's stats from CFL.ca including this season so far. Click on the window. Two receptions for 26 yards.

CFL.ca

Gavin Cobb - CFL.ca

2025: Blue Bombers The Blue Bombers first signed Cobb on February 11, 2025 in CFL free agency and then agreed to terms with the veteran receiver on a one-year contract on January 16, 2026 following hi

Edited yesterday at 08:02 PM1 day by SpeedFlex27

2 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

No, I've already mentioned them in a positive light by posting that I believe that they'll be thousand yard receivers for us. I guess you conveniently forgot that. Or perhaps you didn't know. Maybe read EVERYTHING I post & stop just cherry picking me. Funny how I never do that to you. I even press "Like" every once in awhile when you post something. You know, I've tried to get along with you but you're not interested in ending this feud. Therefore, no longer care what you think.

There’s no feud brother, it’s a message board. You should press like on everything I write, my belief system would not allow me to post something that wasn’t worth liking.

2 minutes ago, Mike said:

There’s no feud brother, it’s a message board. You should press like on everything I write, my belief system would not allow me to post something that wasn’t worth liking.

Truly, can we end this endless arguing between us & have a fresh start? Every once in awhile maybe say something positive about one my posts. Instead of always criticizing. I'll do the same for you. When I get a a notification that you made a comment on one of my posts I think, "Now what did I say wrong??" What we're doing now is a pointless back & forth & it's been going on for years. I don't know about you but I'm getting tired of it all. We both need to move on.

59 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Truly, can we end this endless arguing between us & have a fresh start? Every once in awhile maybe say something positive about one my posts. Instead of always criticizing. I'll do the same for you. When I get a a notification that you made a comment on one of my posts I think, "Now what did I say wrong??" What we're doing now is a pointless back & forth & it's been going on for years. I don't know about you but I'm getting tired of it all. We both need to move on.

Honestly. You need to cyber knock him out. Cuz the mocking from a mod is pretty excessive.

On 2026-06-14 at 4:04 AM, SpeedFlex27 said:

I stick to an opinion because my belief system tells me I'm right. I don't expect every Bomber receiver to get a thousand yards & I never said anything like that about Cobb. I do expect our receivers to work together as a unit making it difficult for defenses to cover them all completely. To me, Cobb is not a threat nor is he even a concern. We let Wheatfall & Stearns go & so far playing on teams with OC's not named Hogan, they look very good. Yeah, our passing attack is working but we're only as good as our weakest link. We also are thin at receiver with little depth. One or two injuries & we'll be in trouble like last season. We're fine as long as we're healthy. Think Cobb will step up if he is called upon? Maybe but I doubt it.

Do you want to go through game threads from last season and see what you wrote then about Wheatfall and Stearns? What your belief system told you then?

18 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

What stat sheet? Give me Cobb's numbers after two games, then.

4 out of 5 starting WRs had over or near 100 yards last week. But because the #5 guy didn't....that's a problem? As of right now, he's on pace for just under 500 yards, which is essentially Wolly type numbers. What else do you expect from a #5 wr? "Defences don't respect him" isn't an argument. It's your opinion. And while there may be some truth to it, if Defences didn't care about him, they wouldn't be covering him and the rest of the WR core would be impacted. The O can not spread the ball around like it has been, without the defences covering the entire field. Which is the point I was making, the WRs working together to get each other open. You decided to cherry pick the individual state line...I was talking the stat sheet of the WR core.

14 hours ago, Goalie said:

Honestly. You need to cyber knock him out. Cuz the mocking from a mod is pretty excessive.

lol wtf does that even mean? This might be the lamest attempt at tough guy internet talk I've ever come across.

Edited 8 hours ago8 hr by Bigblue204

Until the offense starts to sputter, lets all unite about how bad our defense is. 😁

Edited 7 hours ago7 hr by Super Duper Negatron

15 hours ago, Goalie said:

Honestly. You need to cyber knock him out. Cuz the mocking from a mod is pretty excessive.

lol this is such an embarrassing thing to write down and click the send button on. If Rich wants to take away my "administrator" tag so that I'm allowed to talk the exact same way you talk to people, he's more than welcome to do so. The way you insult Booch is so much worse. The way you start almost 50% of the posts you make with some form of "I don't know if people just don't get it or what" is your (bad) attempt at mocking people and I don't see you having a problem with that. As an aside - I've said on more than one occasion recently, I'm not a moderator here. I don't even think I know how to get into the Mod Panel or whatever it's called anymore. I have this tag because I helped (not really) Rich start this place up way back when.

"cyber knock him out" though ... wow

Such a ridiculous thing to say from probably the most self-unaware person we have in our community. Despite what Al thinks, I don't have a problem with him. If he wants to be loud, boisterous and abrasive and then play the victim when he gets it back, that's up to him. We've all known eachother for going on 15-20 years now. I'd say we're all very comfortable talking with eachother like we would if we were sitting on the couch watching the game together. It's probably the main reason this place still exists in spite of Reddit, etc. Nobody needs to threatening other people.

Pictured: what a cyber knockout might look like.

A good time to remind people that the ignore function exists. It's a tremendous feature that allows you to avoid crazy people whose comments you don't need.

14 minutes ago, Noeller said:

A good time to remind people that the ignore function exists. It's a tremendous feature that allows you to avoid crazy people whose comments you don't need.

I've been beating that drum since that feature first became available .. self moderation is a wonderful thing.

I won’t name names, but a few years ago somebody private messaged me on this site to challenge me to a fight in person lol.

5 minutes ago, sweep the leg said:

I won’t name names, but a few years ago somebody private messaged me on this site to challenge me to a fight in person lol.

And I won.

5 minutes ago, sweep the leg said:

I won’t name names, but a few years ago somebody private messaged me on this site to challenge me to a fight in person lol.

Nate?

2 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

And I won.

TKO....Tap out...or knocked the eff out? haha

7 minutes ago, Booch said:

TKO....Tap out...or knocked the eff out? haha

Could be a DQ - sweeping the leg is illegal under some rule sets.

So also worth remembering, that Cobb is only playing cause Clercius is hurt anyway so it's not like he was a planned starter or anything.

38 minutes ago, sweep the leg said:

I won’t name names, but a few years ago somebody private messaged me on this site to challenge me to a fight in person lol.

Jeeze even after all the **** I talk no one has wanted to fight me... what a failure I am

10 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

So also worth remembering, that Cobb is only playing cause Clercius is hurt anyway so it's not like he was a planned starter or anything.

Jeeze even after all the **** I talk no one has wanted to fight me... what a failure I am

yeah...but since he is hurt...and we dont need to play that many canadians on offence...why are we??

I have no issue if when Clercius is good to go we play the 3...and move him inside for the most part....Nothing wrong with him at all as a 5th...and he can do the TE role as well