SpeedFlex27 Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 9 hours ago, Noeller said: It's really humourous to me watching Booch take the hardline anti-Osh stance, and Gcn20 intentionally take the hardline anti-Walters stance as a reciprocal.... I'm more a fan of grey areas.... And less of the black and white. That's because you don't know as much as Booch. Edited 11 hours ago by SpeedFlex27
Mark H. Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 9 hours ago, Booch said: Also unfocused and woefully unprepared too Which these talent laden teams you referring to tho... '93 - '94; 2001 - 2003 Several GOATs on those teams
bb1 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: That's because you don't know as much as Booch. Nobody knows as much as Booch...😉 Booch, Mark H. and Noeller 1 2
GCn20 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 15 hours ago, Booch said: Saying a guy has obvious flaws...both of them...and signs to rectifying them still seem suspect at best...is humorous? And coming from the person who wails the sky is falling the most around here...and most times with no basis to back any of it? Now that's humorous. Me and @GCn20 differ in opinion on a lot...but also agree on a lot if not more..but also try and put some legitimacy and facts with it...you? Not so much but thanks for the recognition...😁 We both share the same sentiments on a lot of the problems the Bombers have and a similar ideology on what will be required to fix it. I am just not as opposed to MOS being our HC. I think you share similar sentiments to me on KW's job performance. I have said all along that MOS has serious flaws that require the GM to step in. That's the difference of opinion you and I have, who has final say on what players are signed. I believe it is Walters, you believe it is Oshea. I think Osh has final say on what players are kept and how they are used, but i don't believe that Osh has final say on who is signed or resigned. Osh should have input but believe that Walters should wear the hat for who is under contract. If he has ceded that authority to MOS then that is a dereliction of duty imo. Booch 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, Mark H. said: '93 - '94; 2001 - 2003 Several GOATs on those teams The 1980-82 Bombers... 80: 10-6: Second in West. 81: 11-5: Second in West. 82: 11-5: Second in West
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, bb1 said: Nobody knows as much as Booch...😉 nope....Truth bomb haha
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, GCn20 said: We both share the same sentiments on a lot of the problems the Bombers have and a similar ideology on what will be required to fix it. I am just not as opposed to MOS being our HC. I think you share similar sentiments to me on KW's job performance. I have said all along that MOS has serious flaws that require the GM to step in. That's the difference of opinion you and I have, who has final say on what players are signed. I believe it is Walters, you believe it is Oshea. I think Osh has final say on what players are kept and how they are used, but i don't believe that Osh has final say on who is signed or resigned. Osh should have input but believe that Walters should wear the hat for who is under contract. If he has ceded that authority to MOS then that is a dereliction of duty imo. GM yes I believe has final say....or should....that being said Osh has too much sway...was even reported as such, and Walter's even has been on record more or less saying Osh has had hissy fit/temper tantrums about roster...that is not a good thing, and needed to be rectified. We need the G.M to do his jib, and H.C to do his from what the G.M gives him....I dont think thats 100 percent how it's going here, and it's obvious from what we witnessed last few yrs...but when you have buddies all in the role they have here...those defined lines get blurred Walter's prob succumbed to the whining that if you pooch Jake and Kolo....I want this player...or that player kinda thing...and again...bad management all around 8 hours ago, Mark H. said: '93 - '94; 2001 - 2003 Several GOATs on those teams really tho....thats a poor argument that if Osh was coaching those teams they'd have won, because of amy of those coaches had been in control of the 2022-2025 teams...we prob have 3 more cup wins One the yrs u cited we had the QB go out in EF and also got boned on 2 calls in the pre-review era another a kicker who couldnt hit broad side of a barn and a RB who was essentially still drunk come game day....
rebusrankin Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 93-Matty got hurt and we had to play Garza 94-Hit the upright and lost by 2 and a call in favour of Baltimore that would be reversed if there had been replay. Booch and Bigblue204 1 1
Mark H. Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 55 minutes ago, Booch said: One the yrs u cited we had the QB go out in EF and also got boned on 2 calls in the pre-review era another a kicker who couldnt hit broad side of a barn and a RB who was essentially still drunk come game day.... Some of these issues...are strongly connected to coaching. 21 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: 93-Matty got hurt and we had to play Garza 94-Hit the upright and lost by 2 and a call in favour of Baltimore that would be reversed if there had been replay. Yes. And there are excuses for 2001 too.
Booch Posted 48 minutes ago Report Posted 48 minutes ago 31 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Some of these issues...are strongly connected to coaching. Yes. And there are excuses for 2001 too. YEAH...true, as seen here that coaching has rostered questionable players I know you are a Osh fan, and I can say yes he was a huge part of that success (can't be denied) but was also a bigger part of the flops too, as he had final say
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now