rebusrankin Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago I didn't expect Hatcher to make it to free agency. Good reup by BC. It would be nice for us to do something positive like that. For example, get a deal done with Demski. Noeller and Booch 1 1
blue85gold Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 3 minutes ago, ShyGuy said: WR Market is off to a Bonkers start. 25 year old Philpot who has played one full season (his rookie year) and had only one 100 yard game in the regular season (tho what a game) is the highest paid Canadian receiver. 31 year old Hatcher with an Achilles tear on his Injury record is the highest paid non-QB and his deal is almost entirely guaranteed Where did you see terms for Hatcher? 48 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: I don't worry much about D for Canadians. It's pretty easy to find guys that can fill roles to have 2-3 on the field. But holy **** is our offense depleted in general and especially for Canadians. The drop from Demski to the next Cdn receiver on the roster is miles Tracker, rebusrankin, wbbfan and 1 other 3 1
ShyGuy Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 3 minutes ago, blue85gold said: Where did you see terms for Hatcher? 51 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: https://www.sportsnet.ca/cfl/article/wr-keon-hatcher-signs-contract-extension-with-lions/ The B.C. Lions have signed star wide receiver Keon Hatcher Sr. to a contract extension through the 2027 season, the CFL club announced Wednesday. Financial terms were not disclosed, but a person with knowledge of the contract said it exceeded $645,000, with $630,000 guaranteed. Hatcher was slated to become a free agent in February. blue85gold 1
rebusrankin Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago So $315,000 for Hatcher, Rourke is what $600,000 + and Betts makes big $ too. BC is going to run out of money. Tracker, Piggy 1 and wbbfan 2 1
Pete Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago (edited) Does anyone know how the extra 400k this year factors into this? It appears some teams such as the Bombers utilized it to increase their depth making use of the one game injury to keep additional players on the roster, maybe others held back on more of it to allow them to sign players such as Hatcher and Philpot both of whom received significant bonuses which could be put towards this years sms..(which was smart btw) Originally there was talk of the cflpa trying to make sure the 400k was evenly distributed but lits just as likely as it goes to elite players Edited 18 hours ago by Pete wbbfan 1
ShyGuy Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 35 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: So $315,000 for Hatcher, Rourke is what $600,000 + and Betts makes big $ too. BC is going to run out of money. Elks spent like drunken sailors on defense last season and it didn't work out great for them. Lions taking a similar approach on offense
Booch Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 2 minutes ago, ShyGuy said: Elks spent like drunken sailors on defense last season and it didn't work out great for them. Lions taking a similar approach on offense too bad they need a defence lol Bigblue204, Piggy 1 and wbbfan 3
3rdand1.5 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Dang $275 for Philpot and $315 for Hatcher.....the top tier receiver market is getting crazy... What the heck are the Riders going to do with all there FA receivers and some very good CDN receivers when put side by side Philpot......I can't see Emilus accepting less than Philpot, KeeSean Johnson has to be paid high as I think many other teams would be high on him and Meyers if he stays in the CFL again should command a high dollar....not even accounting for Bane jr and Robustelli, or fellow CDN's KSB, Tommy Neild and Mitch Picton. wbbfan and rebusrankin 2
wbbfan Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 3 hours ago, rebusrankin said: So $315,000 for Hatcher, Rourke is what $600,000 + and Betts makes big $ too. BC is going to run out of money. I wonder if they are front loading parts of the contract with excess space this year. Or maybe they just intend to go over the cap again as much as they feel like.
bigg jay Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 33 minutes ago, wbbfan said: I wonder if they are front loading parts of the contract with excess space this year. Or maybe they just intend to go over the cap again as much as they feel like. They've gone over the cap the last 2 seasons (and by more than any other team) so why stop now? They pay guys like Rourke & Betts a good chunk of their salary as marketing money and yet they still go over the cap - Doman does not seem to have an issue with that but it hasn't really paid off for them yet. wbbfan 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 13 hours ago, GCn20 said: A 250k+ contract to a running back, ANY running back, is going to hinder any team unless they put up MOP calibre numbers and clutch performance. We got hosed on his contract last year. We got hosed or did Hogan hose Oliveira? How many games was Brady Oliveira underused & even forgotten? He's still the best running back in the CFL. If we lose him then it just tells me that nothing has changed with the club. Edited 11 hours ago by SpeedFlex27 BigBlueFanatic, Piggy 1, Booch and 1 other 4
SpeedFlex27 Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 2 hours ago, wbbfan said: I wonder if they are front loading parts of the contract with excess space this year. Or maybe they just intend to go over the cap again as much as they feel like. With the Phiolpott & Hatcher signings, could that be a hint that teams have been told the salary cap is going up substantially again? No excuses this year for the Bombers if it does. Piggy 1 1
GCn20 Posted 38 minutes ago Report Posted 38 minutes ago 11 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: We got hosed or did Hogan hose Oliveira? How many games was Brady Oliveira underused & even forgotten? He's still the best running back in the CFL. If we lose him then it just tells me that nothing has changed with the club. When playing from behind BO loses touches. However, in the games where we got behind early part of it was because he didn't run well. Is he the best back in the CFL? Could be, but not by much and he's paid as if he is almost twice as good as everyone else. He isn't and that's the problem. This isn't about BO's ability, it's about whether he is worth his astronomical salary. Booch 1
GCn20 Posted 32 minutes ago Report Posted 32 minutes ago 18 hours ago, Booch said: not on this team with this HC...nope....have to disagree with that...and not just with Eli situation Not sure what you have seen in Eli to have such faith in him. He has been a matador whenever inserted into the starting group.
17to85 Posted 12 minutes ago Report Posted 12 minutes ago 19 minutes ago, GCn20 said: Not sure what you have seen in Eli to have such faith in him. He has been a matador whenever inserted into the starting group. At guard... he's never got much chance at centre where our actual centee being a matador would be an improvement. Kolankowski spends most of the game wandering around like he's lost. AB BomberFan 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now