Bombers at BC SUCKS GDT

[Nolby]

No reason why we should lose this game, Zachs back, BC has some Shlub in Masoli, season series on the line....LETS ******* GO!!!

[Booch]

3 hours ago, Nolby said:

No reason why we should lose this game, Zachs back, BC has some Shlub in Masoli, season series on the line....LETS ******* GO!!!

Yup...shouldn't be a cake walk but I can see us cruising...

[no71]

Just win!  1-0 today. GO BLUE!!  

[3rdand1.5]

They "should" be better this week, at home and with film on us......but Masoli is a real wild card, he certainly looked "ridged" last game, maybe he has "loosened up" this week in practice, but due kinda looked like he had Kerwin Bell level mobility...

 

I don't expect Peterson to be as good as last week, but I sure would love to see it again, and I hope to see the "freight train" punish a few players. We completely shut down BC''s run game, it was beautifully done If we can do it again, I don't see us loosing, but with Masoli, they may try and lean on/establish the run harder than last week.......

 

They are getting IMO a big boost back on teh D-line with Teuhema back, and we changed our o-line, perhaps this is a spot where we could struggle, we handled it so well last week, this week will be a bigger challange.

 

Beryhill out, probably hurts them, but Clercious not 100% hurts us

 

I think IF we play specials like we did last week and "win" the field position battles, we should come out on top tonight.....Easily no, I don't think so, but IF we can get them into some adversity early, they may start to allow some self-doubt to creep in

[wbbfan]

Keys to the game 

 keep the ol play level up. Vanterpool out and paddy a little knicked, our ol needs to keep growing and improving can’t step back now. 
 

Old zach back. He looked a lot better in pre season/camp than much of last year, need to see peak Zach this year and a good start will go a long way. 
 

Limit the big plays. Last week B.C. dug out from the verge of a blow out with big plays. 
 

players to watch Cooley/Peterson, vaval, bridges, Parker, zach, Wallace. 

[Booch]

Key...on defence none this sit back and try and make Masollli beat our back end....He's smart and seen enough in his time he could gouge us....Pressure pressure and bring guys from different looks

ZC....Not get too greedy and deep shot addicted early...set a tone...and let game come to us

Ground and pound with both backs...actually start Cooley as BC I am sure has prepped for Peterson...catch em off guard

Edited 3 hours ago by Booch

[Tracker]

1 hour ago, Booch said:

Key...on defence none this sit back and try and make Masoli beat our back end....He's smart and seen enough in his time he could gouge us....Pressure pressure and bring guys from different looks

ZC....Not get too greedy and deep shot addicted early...set a tone...and let game come to us

Ground and pound with both backs...actually start Cooley as BC I am sure has prepped for Peterson...catch em off guard

What would stop Peterson would stop Cooley, so have the running back leak out into the flats as a receiver from time to time. With all the changes in the Lions, it ought to be reasonably easy to confuse their defence and offence.

Edited 1 hour ago by Tracker

[WinnipegGordo]

 

 

[Booch]

14 minutes ago, Tracker said:

What would stop Peterson would stop Cooley, so have the running back leak out into the flats as a receiver from time to time. With all the changes in the Lions, it ought to be reasonably easy to confuse their defence and offence.

Cooley actually is a power back with finesse.  A work horse..a bit different feom Peterson and sometimes just the out of nowhere change messes teams up.

[JuranBoldenRules]

13 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said:

 

 

Hladik is ******* terrible.

[Atomic]

42 minutes ago, Booch said:

Cooley actually is a power back with finesse.  A work horse..a bit different feom Peterson and sometimes just the out of nowhere change messes teams up.

I figure Peterson gets some early carries but Cooley ends up carrying the load the rest of the way. And that's not a knock on Peterson, I just think Cooley is a stud in waiting

[Booch]

17 minutes ago, Atomic said:

I figure Peterson gets some early carries but Cooley ends up carrying the load the rest of the way. And that's not a knock on Peterson, I just think Cooley is a stud in waiting

Yeah...hes the kind of back not seen up here in a while...be interesting his use...and production and moving forward if we find a way to have all 3 guys rostered...that be quite a backfield