Lets see if we can keep this thread a little more civil.

I found this interview very interesting.  A lot of soft balls thrown at Trump, he explained his back pedalling on his more extreme issues as a lot of his claims as opening bids for negotiation purposes.  Which .. whatever .. I still think that those are insincere claims he used to get elected.

He does now come across way more presidential then he did prior to the election.  A lot of his noise, yelling, and rhetoric has been scaled back.

Do respect this one though:

Quote

 

Lesley Stahl: Are you gonna take the salary, the president’s salary?

Donald Trump: Well, I’ve never commented on this, but the answer is no. I think I have to by law take $1, so I’ll take $1 a year. But it’s a -- I don’t even know what it is.

Donald Trump: Do you know what the salary is?

Lesley Stahl: $400,000 you’re giving up.

Donald Trump: No, I’m not gonna take the salary. I’m not taking it.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-donald-trump-family-melania-ivanka-lesley-stahl/

3 hours ago, Zontar said:

The "backlash" is actually the realization of how phoney and hypocritical it all is. I used Clinton as an example because by your own woke standard he should have been among the first to be driven out of public life.

Woke SJW culture is nothing more than a cover for the quest for power and control over people they can't convince with logic. You use words equality and fairness without a hint of irony.

Stop wondering why people oppose woke culture because I just told you why. If you keep furnishing examples I'll probably keep pointing it 

Was Clinton not impeached? What else do you want? 

Remember he brought up Clinton because people were critical of Trump choosing Dershowitz and Start as his defenders in the senate.  It was to distract from that and to defend the allegations of child rape.  Weird eh?  Clinton has nothing to do with what’s happening now.  Irrelevant point he brought up. 
 

oh speaking of Dershowitz 

 

Either the White House is so stupid they don’t realize removing trump elevates pence to president or they’re really, really worried about Pence.... 

 

 

Trump just pretends to be a religious nut.  Pence is....

9 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

How he’s even still allowed to troll these threads is beyond me.  I think maybe this thread has been abandoned lol. Which is actually probably better than the alternative. 

Correct. If this thread required any more suspensions, it would probably meet its demise.  lol

There is only one alternative left at this point. lol

11 hours ago, Mark H. said:

Correct. If this thread required any more suspensions, it would probably meet its demise.  lol

There is only one alternative left at this point. lol

Suspensions are the thread's fault ?

Edited January 19, 20206 yr by Zontar

5 hours ago, Zontar said:

Suspensions are the thread's fault ?

If I confiscate a kid’s device - am I confiscating it because the device is at fault? 

54 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

If I confiscate a kid’s device - am I confiscating it because the device is at fault? 

Exactly. Responsibility and  blame lies with the individual. 

Edited January 19, 20206 yr by Zontar

Pervy Dersh might rue the day he wanted the spotlight again.

15 minutes ago, bustamente said:

Pervy Dersh might rue the day he wanted the spotlight again.

Alleged child rapist- C'mon!

1 hour ago, Zontar said:

Exactly. Responsibility and  blame lies with the individual. 

Yep - but I still confiscated his device. 

59 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

Yep - but I still confiscated his device. 

Who was the baddie ?

On 2020-01-18 at 4:43 PM, The Unknown Poster said:

Either the White House is so stupid they don’t realize removing trump elevates pence to president or they’re really, really worried about Pence.... 

 

Trump goes down then Pence is next one to face impeachment. There is plenty of evidence to incriminate him regarding Ukraine and lots of Trump's other crimes. The GOP will do whatever they can to keep the dominoes from falling so there isn't a President Pelosi.

18 minutes ago, Jacquie said:

Trump goes down then Pence is next one to face impeachment. There is plenty of evidence to incriminate him regarding Ukraine and lots of Trump's other crimes. The GOP will do whatever they can to keep the dominoes from falling so there isn't a President Pelosi.

If they were smart they’d remove trump and quickly confirm a popular vp to protect against a pence impeachment 

5 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

If they were smart they’d remove trump and quickly confirm a popular vp to protect against a pence impeachment 

I googled the scenario and the few results I found indicated Pence could name a VP but Pelosi would still become President if Pence was also removed from that Office.

Edited January 20, 20206 yr by Jacquie

38 minutes ago, Jacquie said:

I googled the scenario and the few results I found indicated Pence could name a VP but Pelosi would still become President if Pence was also removed from that Office.

If pence nominated a vp who was confirmed by the senate and then he was impeached and removed the vp would become president.  She’d only become president in the absence of a VP.  
 

This was a real concern during Nixon actually, as his VP was likely to be impeached.  They quickly replaced him with ford. 

All the best people.  
 

 

1 hour ago, The Unknown Poster said:

All the best people.  
 

 

Who among us hasn't misplaced a cell phone while enlisting the services of Russian hookers? 

Calling witnesses for the removal trial should be as easy as:

 

 

A very concise analysis of the Removal trial:

 

 

12 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

If pence nominated a vp who was confirmed by the senate and then he was impeached and removed the vp would become president.  She’d only become president in the absence of a VP.  
 

This was a real concern during Nixon actually, as his VP was likely to be impeached.  They quickly replaced him with ford. 

From what I've read that VP would not slide into the line of succession. The line starts with Trump, then Pence and then Pelosi. The new VP would only be included in the line if Pence and the VP won the next election.

Agnew resigned and was replace by Ford before the Articles of Impeachment could be presented against Nixon so Ford was the VP for the line of succession. 

3 hours ago, Jacquie said:

From what I've read that VP would not slide into the line of succession. The line starts with Trump, then Pence and then Pelosi. The new VP would only be included in the line if Pence and the VP won the next election.

Agnew resigned and was replace by Ford before the Articles of Impeachment could be presented against Nixon so Ford was the VP for the line of succession. 

I don’t think so. I mean you may be right. But once pence is sworn in as president he’d have the right to nominate a new VP.  I don’t think the senate would confirm though, so close to an election so it wouldn’t matter. And they sure as heck wouldn’t impeach pence if trump was gone.  They’d never elevate Nancy. 

 

 

" After everything we've done, we should just go in and take all the wheels!!! "

Trump is not qualified to stock shelves in a grocery store.

And he's not America's first senile President.

Edited January 22, 20206 yr by Mark F

Where's that golden chalice that the Dictator King should be using, is he regurgitating something before taking the most awkward sip I have seen on my life