Jump to content

Atomic

Members
  • Posts

    10,573
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Atomic

  1. He is a fine #2/3 receiver and he catches the ball when it comes his way. At the very least, he is experienced and familiar with Willy, Nichols, and Lapo. Davis - Denmark - Mayo - Sheppard/McDuffie - Kohlert ... Denmark would be a welcome addition to that bunch. Davis becomes the defacto #1 receiver.
  2. They said 2 weeks when he got hurt, and that was 2 weeks ago... but I'm not counting on it
  3. Good point about Medlock. He's up to 80% on the year now. Would have been a very different game with a kicker going 1/5 or 2/5 like last year at times.
  4. I don't see why you get all up in arms when someone disagrees with you. Sometimes I'm right, sometimes I'm wrong. Same with you. I expect to get called out on it when I'm wrong but I certainly don't expect any praise when I'm right. It's the internet. This is how it's always been. If you don't want people to disagree with you then don't say anything. It's called discussion. I don't like being singled out by name as a bully or part of some gang just because I have an opinion that runs contrary to yours.
  5. Sewell is not and has never been a starter, another lie to support your argument
  6. Johnson? I'd say he played his best game of the season last night
  7. I think if they send Loffler on the blitz the QB won't be getting up
  8. Addison Richards is healthy... could this be his chance to show why he was drafted in the second round?
  9. He was "close" before last game. With Masoli's play last week I'd be surprised if they rush Collaros in now. But maybe, they are on bye this week.
  10. Yeah, I don't mind it. I think back to a few years ago when Cornish was getting stuffed consistently at the line of scrimmage and he called out his OL... the OL made a complete 180 after that and became one of the best in the CFL. Sometimes a well-respected player calling out underperformers can be exactly what the doctor ordered... just can't do it every week or get carried away.
  11. Nichols looked pretty similar to Willy IMO other than the huge difference - he hit the deep ball when he had the chance. I also believe this was the best lineup we have put on the field this season... take out Roberts for Randle and we'd really be on to something.
  12. I wonder if Ryan Smith will be ready for this week. Definitely on board with signing Denmark if Adams and Dressler are both out long term.
  13. It's nice when we can have a rookie Canadian step in and we say something other than "Well he wasn't that bad"
  14. This is your post below. Tell me again how I'm lying?? You're right, it is pure garbage like this that is disappointing. You say **** and you don't back it up and then you straight up lie and deny about what you've said.
  15. Frederick for sure. That would have been a different game entirely if Frederick was getting lit up all day. He rose to the challenge in a big way.
  16. To be fair that's his third 100 yard game of the season
  17. No one wrote him off.... you suggested we trade Jamaal Westerman for him. People can still think Gale is a good QB prospect and not think that's a good trade.
  18. He was a huge creep before the sexual assault charge, even moreso after. No thanks. If he grinded up against my daughter I'm not sure I'd be standing there saying "Well they're fully clothed so its okay."
  19. Such a strange thought process. I don't see how there is any less pressure to produce wins. To me, taking out the starting QB shows that pressure is at a maximum and they are reaching for the last resort.
  20. Doubt they would last 10 more years
  21. This is the biggest issue for me. Ok, you don't like O'Shea, you don't like Willy. No reason to go into every thread and say the exact damn same thing. Reasonable posters try to start a conversation about say, the receivers, and someone has to pipe in with "They'll never succeed with O'Shea calling the shots! Now let me tell you again why I hate O'Shea..... (etc.)". It's just pointless and makes it impossible to have a conversation.
  22. No pressure? What is this even based on? I'm all for legitimate criticism but this is closer to a conspiracy theory. Some people just see and hear what they want to.
×
×
  • Create New...