Jump to content

17to85

Members
  • Posts

    19,128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    135

Everything posted by 17to85

  1. My question is, would there have been a punishment handed down if the Riders had won rather than getting their asses handed to them? How would that have played out. The other question, what the hell were the refs watching that they didn't notice it? The whole point of designated imports is to prevent this sort of thing from happening.
  2. The real impressive thing about Milt is how he did all that he did with a whole lot of shitty, shitty quarterbacks. His numbers exploded with Khari Jones but that only lasted a few years then he got Glenn who is Glenn, OK but not great. Other than those two is was a steaming pile of crap to work with and he STILL has amazing career numbers.
  3. This is I think the real key here. Milanovich has seen good performances from his quarterbacks his whole coaching career. I suspect that he is as good an offensive coach as the reputation suggests. Maas arguably helped Ray more than Ray helped Maas cause Maas was playing in Edmonton before Ray showed up and when Ray did have some downs in Edmonton they threw Maas in to settle things down.
  4. Was Denmark replaced by better talent though? Injury prone is still something that you can give 2nd chances too and the whole point with lirim is that he had a good rookie year and poor sophmore year so you could in theory say the poor 2nd year is the anomaly and give him a chance to redeem himself. Not the only guys Walters has moved on from quickly either and I doubt they are the last. Guy is quick to move on.
  5. Well there's Arugula, Denmark and Moore from just this past offseason.
  6. TSN has a problem where they think the game on it's own isn't enough of a selling point so they have to add in all the extra crap. It's nonsense. let the game sell itself, a good example would be the Saturday night game between Calgary and BC, that game was exciting from the get go and the finish can not be beat. I am glad I was in the stadium for it rather than having to listen to TSN try and push a bunch of un-needed hype.
  7. but by not piling on Willy and proclaiming him the worst person in the world! you are just a blind Willy defender.
  8. But sometimes guys have bad seasons and bounce back, I never doubted that Arugula would bounce back, but Kyle Walters has a history of not giving guys that chance to rebound.
  9. I always felt that Denmark was a guy worth giving a shot to bounce back. He may not be a #1 guy but he did some good things for this team in the past.
  10. The thing that really stood out about jennings to me was how easily he can fire a hard pass down field. Good strong arm on that guy and lots of ability to make things happen on the run but he definitely forced things at the end. He wasn't trying to throw out of bounds he just got pressured and didn't get enough on it. OT he tried to force it again and it cost him.
  11. Yeah i won some tickets to the game and the crowd was pretty into it at the end but there was a smattering of boos in the middle of the game and some general Calgary fan ass hattery throughout. I did laugh at all the people leaving. Missed a hell of a comeback.
  12. I still think he's too passive but it was a good game plan, I also think that the esks shuffling bodies around on their offensive line helped a ton too because our defensive line won the battle on the line of scrimmage pretty decisively. Reilly was flustered and that rarely happens.
  13. To be honest I think when we blow out the ticats they'll give O'Shea the extension that has been waiting for go.
  14. Jesus tap dancing christ there is a growing amount of butt hurt in this thread
  15. It's a worthwhile question. I know the coaches have their stock answers but if a one qb system isn't working.....
  16. Oh sure in an ideal world you have a great starter that takes all the reps because he's that good... but we don't have that guy, what we have are Willy and Nichols and maybe, just maybe looking at things that worked in the past can be a blueprint for things now. We know that both Willy and Nichols are capable of good play, but it appears that right now neither one is capable of doing it on a consistent basis, so why not platoon them? This idea that you have one guy and one guy only is a new one, that doesn't mean it's better. Trying to stick with one guy hasn't been working here for years, why not try something different?
  17. was actually a discussion started about Dresslers injury and a possible replacement.
  18. lots easier to talk **** when you are physically dominating the other team as the Bombers did last night.
  19. No, all that is meant to say is that people are only looking at the positives. Nothing to do with comparing one guy to the other, just that people are dismissing the errors that Nichols did make and only looking at the positive. Balance is the key to everything, I am simply trying to provide it.
  20. well the past as in 30 years ago
  21. Walters has a history of that though. moving guys with a big pay day and signing a new guy if he feels the performance isn't up to the pay grade. Doesn't really seem to believe in giving guys a chance to redeem themselves.
  22. As always there are people who like to put their opinion out there but don't like to have to defend it. There are also people who like to challenge people's opinions and make them defend it. Circle of life on the internet.
  23. Oh don't worry I am enjoying it, just trying as always to provide balance and an opposing viewpoint.
×
×
  • Create New...