Jump to content

szaroz71

Members
  • Posts

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by szaroz71

  1. 4 minutes ago, Goalie said:

    Thats cool bro but you's in blue and gold country right now so... It is what it is. We all have fans who refuse to face the facts. Nothing wrong with pointing that out. 

    You're absolutely right. I know where I am... all I was saying was maybe this wasnt the right forum to start up that discussion. There was a lot of humble pie being eaten and some sincere congratulations posted here... but you're right, your territory, your rules. 

    Congrats again. Good luck in the WF!

  2. Just now, Zontar said:

    If you're accepting the loss without all the silly mitigating currently making the rounds, I salute you.

    Did you read my earlier post on this very thread... the one where I congratulated everyone here without a single excuse? 

    And while there are no doubt angry fans on RF... there is an entire thread there congratulating the Bombers on their win.

     

  3. 8 minutes ago, Zontar said:

    This just in..

    The Official Narrative of the game has been composed at RF.

    "Woulda won if Collaros played..so , in a way, we won and completely vindicates everything we did."

    Adjust accordingly. 

    I fail to see the need for this in this thread. We have come here and humbly congratulated Bomber fans on the win. Its actually been quite civil. Yet you feel the need to stir things up... craving attention? Things must be pretty quiet over in the Eastside. 

  4. Congratulations on the win. No excuses here... (other than dumping hot wing sauce on my jersey before the game and the local beer store was out of Pilsner.. All signs we pointing to something bad before kickoff lol)

     I think we had a chance to win the game but Winnipeg made the bigger plays and we didn't. That was the difference.

    Again, congratulations, Good luck in the WSF. Should be a hard hitter. 

  5. 1 minute ago, 17to85 said:

    Yeah just don't understand what you've read. The roster rules talk about maximum numbers. You can't have 44 players with only 2 qbs, you can have 43 with 2 qbs though. Nor can you have 44 players with 4 qbs. 

    Well, this is what is written...

    Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players.

    ...the way I interpreted this, was that each team had to have 3 players identified as QB, whether they are QB's or not, but they had to have 3 listed on the roster. Not saying that I am right, just how I read it. I guess we'll see when Hamilton posts their lineup for game day. 

  6. The term "Banjo Bowl" doesn't offend me at all, and I'm pretty sure the huge majority of fans feel the same way. I'm sure if the league thought it was offensive they would have done something about it a long time ago. The fact is fans on both sides of the border have taken the name and ran with it. It's fun in my opinion, and my advice 3RD AND 1 is just accept that the name ain't going anywhere soon. It's not hurting anyone, and coming over here in enemy territory sure isn't going to get anything done about it lol. All you're doing is getting the locals here riled up.

  7. 1 minute ago, rebusrankin said:

    In the four full games with Collaros, you have 6 offensive TDs. Better but still pretty poor. Also a total of 89 offensive points in those games or 22 per game. Those are Marcel B type numbers.

    Well thankfully we have a pretty good D that covered the slack...

  8. 2 hours ago, Jim McD said:

    New CFL & Bombers fan here from New Jersey.  ESPN does not have any CFL games on the schedule for the next few weeks.   Is there any way to watch Bombers games streaming over the web?

    I guess ESPN must be inundated with poker or drone racing instead of showing actual sports.

    Awesome to see fans from south of the border. (even if you're a Bomber fan lol) How long have you followed the CFL? 

  9. 11 minutes ago, Mr Dee said:

    Wrong.

    Go to page 8 Matt Nichols boo thread..read the transcript. Maybe you and burg can discuss..

     

    Thanks for that. I read it and you're right, that's not exactly what he said, so my apologies. But it was close, and as others on here have mentioned, his teammates could take offense to the comment, or they could just shrug it off. I didn't realize this was discussed to death on your Boo Nichols page.

  10. Just now, TBURGESS said:

    We've all read exactly what he said. It's not about that. It's about how people interpret what he said. It's about saying anything at all that could be misconstrued and it's about making that same mistake two weeks in a row. Better just to say mea culpa then go out and play football.

    Agreed. Look, all I was wondering if anyone else thought the team make take offense to the comment. 

×
×
  • Create New...