-
Posts
80 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Posts posted by szaroz71
-
-
Just now, Zontar said:
If you're accepting the loss without all the silly mitigating currently making the rounds, I salute you.
Did you read my earlier post on this very thread... the one where I congratulated everyone here without a single excuse?
And while there are no doubt angry fans on RF... there is an entire thread there congratulating the Bombers on their win.
-
8 minutes ago, Zontar said:
This just in..
The Official Narrative of the game has been composed at RF.
"Woulda won if Collaros played..so , in a way, we won and completely vindicates everything we did."
Adjust accordingly.
I fail to see the need for this in this thread. We have come here and humbly congratulated Bomber fans on the win. Its actually been quite civil. Yet you feel the need to stir things up... craving attention? Things must be pretty quiet over in the Eastside.
-
-
Congratulations on the win. No excuses here... (other than dumping hot wing sauce on my jersey before the game and the local beer store was out of Pilsner.. All signs we pointing to something bad before kickoff lol)
I think we had a chance to win the game but Winnipeg made the bigger plays and we didn't. That was the difference.
Again, congratulations, Good luck in the WSF. Should be a hard hitter.
-
Drive safe. Hopefully the road conditions are good this weekend.
-
3 minutes ago, J5V said:
And yet here you are, taking the time to upload your little picture you've been saving. Sounds like you care.
- blue_gold_84, Eternal optimist and SPuDS
- 1
- 2
-
-
51 minutes ago, 17to85 said:
Yes but like I said, your reading comprehension fails.
Why? Other than you trying to be insulting, it says 3 shall be identified as quarterbacks. What part of that do you not comprehend?
-
1 minute ago, 17to85 said:
Yeah just don't understand what you've read. The roster rules talk about maximum numbers. You can't have 44 players with only 2 qbs, you can have 43 with 2 qbs though. Nor can you have 44 players with 4 qbs.
Well, this is what is written...
Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players.
...the way I interpreted this, was that each team had to have 3 players identified as QB, whether they are QB's or not, but they had to have 3 listed on the roster. Not saying that I am right, just how I read it. I guess we'll see when Hamilton posts their lineup for game day.
-
2 minutes ago, 17to85 said:
It says maximum of 44 players, no mention of a minimum. Not only did you expose your lack of reading comprehension, you doubled down on it.
Yes, maximum 44 players, with 3 of them who shall be identified as quarterbacks
I can read the rules just fine.
-
2 minutes ago, 17to85 said:
Go easy, those tappers have trouble with basic English.
It says 3 players "shall be identified as quarterbacks". Who's having trouble with English?
-
I thought they still have to have 3 players listed as qb... even if only 2 are actually qb. This is from the CFL game rule ratio.
Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players.
-
I think your winning streak comes to an end today. As much as I would like to see Calgary stumble again, I just can't see it happening.
-
5 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said:
He just typed "toilet" and it auto-corrected for him.
(Sorry, couldn't resist)
That was actually pretty funny...
-
-
The term "Banjo Bowl" doesn't offend me at all, and I'm pretty sure the huge majority of fans feel the same way. I'm sure if the league thought it was offensive they would have done something about it a long time ago. The fact is fans on both sides of the border have taken the name and ran with it. It's fun in my opinion, and my advice 3RD AND 1 is just accept that the name ain't going anywhere soon. It's not hurting anyone, and coming over here in enemy territory sure isn't going to get anything done about it lol. All you're doing is getting the locals here riled up.
-
12 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:
**** THE RIDERS
LOVE?
- Bigblue204 and NorthernSkunk
- 1
- 1
-
But you're right, plenty of room for offensive improvement...
-
1 minute ago, rebusrankin said:
In the four full games with Collaros, you have 6 offensive TDs. Better but still pretty poor. Also a total of 89 offensive points in those games or 22 per game. Those are Marcel B type numbers.
Well thankfully we have a pretty good D that covered the slack...
-
2 hours ago, Jim McD said:
New CFL & Bombers fan here from New Jersey. ESPN does not have any CFL games on the schedule for the next few weeks. Is there any way to watch Bombers games streaming over the web?
I guess ESPN must be inundated with poker or drone racing instead of showing actual sports.
Awesome to see fans from south of the border. (even if you're a Bomber fan lol) How long have you followed the CFL?
-
14 minutes ago, SPuDS said:
Way to keep up. That was misquoted and spun outta control by tsn. milt even owned it.
Yes, this was already addressed and I apologized. Way to keep up.
-
23 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:
Riders have 11 offensive touchdowns in 9 games. That's stunningly bad. Of course, their D has 6.
Hey! That averages out to more than 1 per game!!!
- rebusrankin and Piggy 1
- 2
-
11 minutes ago, Mr Dee said:
Wrong.
Go to page 8 Matt Nichols boo thread..read the transcript. Maybe you and burg can discuss..
Thanks for that. I read it and you're right, that's not exactly what he said, so my apologies. But it was close, and as others on here have mentioned, his teammates could take offense to the comment, or they could just shrug it off. I didn't realize this was discussed to death on your Boo Nichols page.
-
Just now, TBURGESS said:
We've all read exactly what he said. It's not about that. It's about how people interpret what he said. It's about saying anything at all that could be misconstrued and it's about making that same mistake two weeks in a row. Better just to say mea culpa then go out and play football.
Agreed. Look, all I was wondering if anyone else thought the team make take offense to the comment.
Congratulations Bombers
in Blue Bomber Discussion
Posted
You're absolutely right. I know where I am... all I was saying was maybe this wasnt the right forum to start up that discussion. There was a lot of humble pie being eaten and some sincere congratulations posted here... but you're right, your territory, your rules.
Congrats again. Good luck in the WF!