Wanna-B-Fanboy

When has he played centre? Also, Kolankowski is beyond useless too...

I mean who the **** cares?  Teammate doesn't throw his buddies under the bus.  The only say he should have on personnel is how he feels about certain receivers and just advisory for the personnel guys in free agency or deciding whether to bring guys back.  Doesn't seem like they've done him that courtesy lately based on what's on our roster today.

Count me out for trading Elgersma. He's the only guy that is really exciting me as a future QB for us. We need to go all in on rebuilding our o line and then pass the torch to Elgersma.

I mean this sincerely, but why? This was such a foregone conclusion, I can't honestly remember the time I was less upset about any Bomber loss.

well past success aside...recent issues ongoing...we need change now anyway, all things come to an end so hopefully both are not back ....we be just fine

There were only three left this week johnzo with two strikes and Wanna Be Fan Boy and TBURGESS with four strikes since they can't tie johnzo up this last week he is the winner Congradulations johnzo.

Marty York, Scott Taylor & Jim Bender.
If there was a Mt. Rushmore of sportscasting irrelevance, they would be on it. 

"Cam Lawson at DT with Thomas & Schmekel sitting out.

Awesome! we are actually doing something! yay!

Get Wab on the call and trade for her as well

Pictured: "Hogan"

I have no idea how the tall foreheads unlearned this fact these past few years... Here's to hoping that moving forward we keep this up.

I have no idea how the tall foreheads unlearned this fact these past few years... Here's to hoping that moving forward we keep this up.

I have no idea how the tall foreheads unlearned this fact these past few years... Here's to hoping that moving forward we keep this up.

Lesson here is, when the Bombers throw less than 10 times they have a perfect record.

Only two Nat DT's. Has anyone checked to see if O'Shea is okay?

That would be perfect. 

A good employer would 100% consult with their employees, managers and stake holders before large changes to the identity, branding and product of said company. 
 
edit: 
 
Doesn't mean that the employer needs to heed all or any of the suggestions- it's just good business sense to consult those mentioned above. 

A good employer would 100% consult with their employees, managers and stake holders before large changes to the identity, branding and product of said company. 
 
edit: 
 
Doesn't mean that the employer needs to heed all or any of the suggestions- it's just good business sense to consult those mentioned above. 

A good employer would 100% consult with their employees, managers and stake holders before large changes to the identity, branding and product of said company. 
 
edit: 
 
Doesn't mean that the employer needs to heed all or any of the suggestions- it's just good business sense to consult those mentioned above. 

A good employer would 100% consult with their employees, managers and stake holders before large changes to the identity, branding and product of said company. 
 
edit: 
 
Doesn't mean that the employer needs to heed all or any of the suggestions- it's just good business sense to consult those mentioned above. 

A good employer would 100% consult with their employees, managers and stake holders before large changes to the identity, branding and product of said company. 
 
edit: 
 
Doesn't mean that the employer needs to heed all or any of the suggestions- it's just good business sense to consult those mentioned above. 

We'll leave it at this