All Activity

Yep, the only limit is that the team has to be able to justify the amount of marketing money being paid to a player. If BC was allowed to give Rourke 200k, the Bombers should have no problems giving Brady a good chunk either.

Yeah, Lowry having a bad night really hurts because some of those losses were on the PK, giving Dallas instant possession. So one stat feeds the other.

Lowry was 2/13 and Toews who's the #2 faceoff man in the NHL only took 2 draws. Somebody said its not the coach, I disagree and say it is the coach. He's not blameless, the team doesn't show up more often than not.

oh oh. Jets are feeling good about themselves after another loss.

Darren Becker, former Bombers equipment guy. https://www.instagram.com/p/DSEOA0DjFMU/

It's only 4 feet/2% shorter.

Yeah take advantage of the fact we have been pulling in the cash...reward the fans for that support

If there is no limit on market money, the Bombers should use it extensively. Club has been making bank the past few years.

Great signing....hopefully at the expense now of JT and Lawson can gobble up major reps and become the force he is likely to be yup...for a RB who will be 30 in yr 2 of the deal...has had injury issues now3 yrs running....sure a couple instances he played nurt and through it, but was he at his best....could we have done as good or better with sitting hum down till healthy and used a cheap import....very likely His playing style...his age....3 yrs.....man I just cant see the logic in it...and or the success with it through all 3 yrs He actually was one of the higher rated interior guys league wide...Definitely with Canadians players he was...and with proper usage...a Oline killer DT riding shotgun with him....he becomes an elite National starter Yup...a lesser cost....I think be more acceptable...Or half being marketing...even better even at 300k......And that option with marketing can allow us to chase a top ranked WR and or OL guy and that would likely allow BO to not get the snot beat out of him game in and game out as well

He has one more big pay day and 2 good years at least left in him. I wouldn't want to pay $300 000. But I'd have zero issues if it was $250 000. We will need him for the next two years while we buy time in bringing in a real QB.

The rink in Italy is smaller by nhl standards....and accordingly hasn't been deemed safe???Maybe Scheif would be better off staying at home.....although he's being wasted the way the club is playing now....IF they don't start putting together some wins, the playoffs are going to be just a goodbye....

Wilson and Lawson no-brainer signings. Very good players that shouldn't break the bank.

I do believe I had that.... https://engage.winnipeg.ca/namethatplow/brainstormers/name-that-plow?fbclid=IwY2xjawOlS0lleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFJS0l6dEpqZVFwNnhoRXpmc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHioIaTrG17WKm94MDiPC81u7pwMAwth_-PAYLCkeWvyp2h4vEHIhf5t7PYvN_aem_LS5eoDwjIrLXRdTuF69fPw

Love it! I love that Wilson and Lawson are the first two guys signed. I think it means we’re prioritizing the youth. There was so many times I saw Lawson double and tripled teamed and he still got to the quarterback. He’s a beast and will only look even better next once we get some help beside him.

You too huh?

That makes too much sense.....however Osh has an obsession with that extra pic.....looks good on his resume I guess not on the clubs

As I stated in my last post, SMS impact is my secondary concern on this proposed contract. Almost all of the 3 year contracts being signed now in the CFL are done so that there is a large portion of year 3 guaranteed. That could be a disaster SMS wise down the road. If he wasn't a RB I wouldn't hate it as much, but you and I both know 3 years for a RB is like signing a receiver and offering him guaranteed money in year 10. The odds are higher that the contract will hamper than they are of it working out.

Good for Lawson.... Now let's actually play the ******* guy.

Name one that worked out in the past 5 years. Without even looking at the 900k, this would be a horrible idea. 3 year contracts are now negotiated so that the player gets some guaranteed money. A RB should NEVER have guaranteed money 3 years down the road. NEVER. Couple that with 900k and you've got a contract that is an absolute farce. If some of that is marketing money, that's great and reduces the 900k part but if any of that contract (being a 3 year deal) is guaranteed that is a very, very bad contract. RBs have a short and unpredictable shelf life that should never see a guaranteed amount in year 3.

Yup mine too, been with her for almost 35 years. Could care less about sports unless it involved our kids. She just knows to buy me Bomber and Jet gear. For that she's appreciative. Easy smeasy. Other than that, I'm just walking a white noise toddler doing his best to be funny and annoying. I'm told I'm really good at the latter.

Glad that we've signed younger guys in Lawson and Wilson.

Come on DVD!