Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Wild finish... Hate a West team picking up a win.
  3. In b4 vintage Legghio miss lol
  4. Because the D just does the same thing every play.... Chemistry matters in terms of guys seeing the same thing and making the same adjustments based on what the D provides. They can talk about it and have a plan but the only way to get that is repetition.
  5. Ticats decided not to pressure Rourke for the last few snaps and it cost them.
  6. Today
  7. Nobody finds the open D-Linemen like Rourke 🤣
  8. Rourke what the heck was that
  9. That was a hell of a throw Rourke, right to the D lineman in coverage
  10. I'll never cheer for Bo, but whatever it takes to keep the Lions down below us... I don't trust the bombers to take care of our own business. Hopefully we can get some help here.
  11. Alright late to the show here and I dont normally setup topics... TNF is a good one thus far. This looks like what happens when neither team wants to run the ball, tie game about to head into the 4th
  12. Chemistry matters on scramble plays; knowing what each other are thinking when things break down. A vet like Mitchell shouldn’t have a problem figuring it out with Collaros pretty fast. It’s not like putting Mitchell in is breaking up a Jones-Stegall type of connection. All he has to do is out-produce Corcoran…
  13. It’s a lazy crutch. If your qb isn’t able to build chemistry with a guy that’s a problem. But you can’t stick to only guys he has spent a lot of time with and who he has it with from practice.
  14. Yeah, it’d be a nice ad for us. especially with Demski getting a little nicked last week.
  15. Don't need chemistry...get open...and separation in your designed route...QB make the throw...its not rocket science The "Chemistry" thing is a bit over stated at times...the knowing when or where to go on busted plays...and cut off your route for sure is feel thing...but if majority of your plays have to rely on that...u ain't winning much
  16. I'd be shocked if Mitchell's chemistry with the QB is that quick... I figure it'll take time but hopefully he figures it out. As for Woods, I'm sure it was always going to be Schmeck or Korny that got on to replace Lawson... It's the Osh way...
  17. what can I say Canadian Tennis is rising
  18. It will come back...hes very early off of surgery when you think bout it He runs better than ZC tho even with his not back to form
  19. Id take him immediately...gives us actual depth and guy can be a playmaker too...Corcoran I currently can't see ever being a real playmaker
  20. I can't see adams being replaced...my guess is Ayers if/when Woods gets on...better not be J.Jones And yeah...I hope Mitchell goes off
  21. I hope Mitchell goes ballistic and makes O'Shea and co eat crow.
  22. Yesterday
  23. Hope we don’t dress both lol. Mitchell best go off for a huge game this week Doesn’t look like woods is going in for adams or at all.
  24. I mean better than Corcoran
  25. Per CFL.ca To PR: Cooley, Cobb, Artopeous, Woods (from IR) To AR: Mitchell, Paterson, D. Lawson
  26. We're stuck hoping that Collaros will find 'IT' again or that Strev will finally find 'IT' for the first time.
  27. Zach has gotten worse compared to 5 years ago too... you're spending all your time focusing on the problems of streveler and Wilson meanwhile just hoping that collaros can turn back the clock... Collaros will hit some more bombs right now that's true... but he will also get sacked a bunch and thrown ints as well. So I guess in your opinion you roll the dice on hitting enough deep shots to win and that being the best chance? The only, and I mean only time this team has been successful offensively the last couple seasons has been when Brady carries it on his back.
  1. Load more activity
  • Morning Big Blue Twitter Feed

×
×
  • Create New...