All Activity

Weitz would not make any sense at all, so he's likely a lock. If Clercius can't go I assume they start Corcoran and Cobb comes on as the back up, which is a little scary. Assume Cooley comes on since Brady and Logan are out. Should be Ayers off in that case but I could see a WTF. Leroux on for Benson. I'd like to see Cooley for Ayers and Bailey for Brady.

TSN trying way too hard to put lipstick on the 240 yard per game total offense QB in Edmonton.

Schoen

Yeah, I don’t want us to cheat but damn it’s like an al team not using the dh because of ethics reasons. hope so, we need him and its a great opportunity right now for him. Bailey would be great, plus Sergio doing both jobs. But I might die or surprise if it actually happened.

Yeah...its not hard to navigate it...every other team does Its Osh trying to make his point as he was one of the only people against the rule..didnt want it....doesn't like it...so doesn't use it to prove his disdain..and not to the betterment of his team...he needs to park his bias Pretty sure big Kev is good to go...Maybe punter guy is gonna sit in lieu of Bailey...if it's for the Weitz...then again...stupid stupid roster move again...prob another coach's favorite play..we have enough LB's and that particular one offers nothing...and can't take defensive reps...hope this not the case

Nope, probably won’t be any until the roster is set. I suspect it’s just temporary until the new one game ir is set. Big Kev is banged up, hopefully he’s ok we are super thin at ni wr.

Any update on punter guy…is he back on the AR?

Osh just plays everything close to the vest and I'm here for it. I guarantee you, in the right company, and a few beers deep, this man is HILARIOUS....

Is it really too hard to use with in the rules? Or are we that high and mighty? Serious question, if we turned back the clock to the beginning of the DI rule, would we ignore that rule? It feels like arrogance. Like we will win with who ever we run out, and that Canadians are as good as Americans and depth guys are as good as stars. Drives me crazy. I can’t watch him in pre game or post game etc. And that’s fine, that and coaches show generally are tailored to a different type of fan than me. Just like the Tait interview video they did with zach etc. those fans need and deserve stuff too. Thought I felt the Zach one was particularly unhinged. I watch some of these and it’s basically our only insight into injuries and I’m not on instatwittertok etc. no sarcasm, I think the better the football coach the worst the interview/post game type stuff. It’s a long ass season, he had a bad year last year. If it was me, I’d park his ass till he’s 100%. You can ruin a qb playing them while struggling and injured.

Yeah, I wish we had a quotable coach like Mike Kelly. Mark my words, no one will ever name a podcast after a Mike O'Shea quote.

Unless the Lions are more forthcoming than the BB are about the precise injury, (other than Dr. Lalji’s report), who really knows what it is?

Everyone knows you can't win without being a better interview!!!

Tommy Boy Stevens.

I think the injury is more of his oblique, the twisting with throwing would probably reduce the power in his throws.

Probably a smart decision from B.C, rib injury can be one of those long term lingering injuries, it’s a long season, no point risking further injury.

https://www.cfl.ca/2025/06/15/cfl-injury-reports-week-3/ Brady is officially out for Saturday. Looks like Rourke is trending towards not playing, but because the Lions only have 3 QBs signed he gets to sit on the active roster, and the Lions are also going to be without Berryhill who had a good week 1 but didn't do much last week.

I think it's both. Bomber O sucked and also they have played hot defenses.

I cringe when i watch these pressers, sometimes i wonder how the HELL he won this many games.

Dedrick Mills

Yes, however it's 3 years in a row of the offense being poor so maaaayyybeeeee it was a bomber O problem moreso than what the other D was doing.

And it's stupid they don't...what point he trying to prove is a mystery And he yip yaps about everyone here as they give us a chance to win...yet continues to play the walking wounded...so obviously he is lying or full of **** but back it up if u gonna say it Yup...as it's was a poor version of what we could have rostered Arbuckler took what was there..played within himself and their game plan was tailored for him to basically succeed if he was smart about it and patient..and he was

Flip side is that the Argo D went out and won the game for them. Our D did not.

No on said scared of Masoli, said, rather play rourke. I dont think rourke has a hope of beating us. What's it like as a coach balancing all these new designations... Mos "The good thing about our team is we don't even mess around with it." Well, you can't break the rules, right? Some guys only get so many snaps.. "Yeah, I we don't even venture down that road. So we wouldn't worry about breaking the rules because we're dont even enter into that conversation, never is a long time, but we haven't yet." What do you think about the rules "I don't think about it." Some people have asked if we use the designations and just don't announce it, and debated about it, but here it is from the horse's mouth. We don't use the extended roster flexibility that every other team in the league does. Arbuckles' game would've been better than Zach's usual playoff performance level here, which is very, very sad.

He did exactly what he had to do. Took what they gave him, took a couple chances that worked out and didn't make big time mistakes. His defence did the rest and controlled the game start to finish basically.

As I said previously... arbuckle didn't do ****, our offense just did much much worse.