gbill2004 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 I really like this O-line...gives us solid Canadian depth too: LT - Daniels (Import) LG - Greaves (Canadian) C - Morley (Canadian) RG - Goossen (Canadian) RT - Tyler (Import) Backups - Neufeld & Hinse (both can play all 3 line spots) PR - Howard, Jones, Knapp Gone - January I sit behind the Bombers bench and I really liked Daniels leadership qualities...very vocal and positive with his teammates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 I hope we may have found a couple tackles but have a feeling the success was due more to Brohm and Marve than anything. I have been saying all year the Willy holds the ball too long and does not move well enough in the pocket to play that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan007 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Willy was better at the beginning, when he didn't have the fear of the opposing D going for his throat every time he hiked the ball. As time went on he lost some of his quickness, I think, because of not wanting to get hit so much. When you lose confidence in your offensive line, it causes breakdowns in the QB play. But I agree with you, Brohm, Marve as well as Cotton, made the Oline look a lot better then it did. Calgary's D was on our QB's just as fast as they usually were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 SMH I guess they are going to have to give up 0 sacks run for 250 yards and have 350 yard passer before they get any credit around here. It was there best game of the season. rebusrankin and Mr Dee 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Daniles not bad at all, but Goossen was beaten pretty soundly more than once, but that's the price you pay to gain experience. Yeah, I saw at least one play where he made a mistake but the kid has to play in order to learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 3rd Scrivener Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Mattie G seemed to get down on himself for some of the mistakes. He was animated coming off the field a few times - looked like he was upset. He's a pure rookie with a ton of grit - he'll be a solid lineman in a few years... I'm really happy with him getting these game reps now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Marve made the Oline and Cotton look better. Brohm made the Oline look better becuase of how quickly he made decisions. The Oline is still is a major issue, although as of late I've been thinking.............. IMO Edmonton's Oline was worse than Winnipeg's last season and they look a lot better this year with pretty much the same talent, is that a credit to McAdoo and Himebauch ? If so are Winnipeg issues solely based on talent or coaching yet again or a combination of both ? Consider that with Reilly EE already have the QB mobility that we witnessed for the first time tonight. This makes the O-lines job easier and the attacking D's job harder. Reilly isn't running for his life or getting hit like he was last season, so what the difference between this and last season in Edmonton ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokinBlue Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Well they started off the year with lots of quick release throws to Bowman, now they've figured out they have a real good running back in John White and are now using him quite a bit, both of those help slow up the rush on the QB. Not to mention it's not really a concern with Reilly because of how* good he runs and how much adamantium has been bonded to his skeleton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Not to mention it's not really a concern with Reilly because of his good he runs and how much adamantium has been bonded to his skeleton. That explains why Reilly always looked so familiar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Definitely the O-Line gets more credit here and they need more work..together. Also, there is no doubt the evasiveness/quick releases of the backups showed up in the lack of sacks. Willy has to pick up that aspect of the game. Is it just a coincidence that Sask., with Sunseri and Doege in the lineup make i.e. look like their offensive line is just average? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Definitely the O-Line gets more credit here and they need more work..together. Also, there is no doubt the evasiveness/quick releases of the backups showed up in the lack of sacks. Willy has to pick up that aspect of the game. Is it just a coincidence that Sask., with Sunseri and Doege in the lineup make i.e. look like their offensive line is just average? Sask didn't look that great even with Durant in there, just looked worse with the fawn Sunseri and Doege who just seems to throw for the sake of throwing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeBird Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Definitely the O-Line gets more credit here and they need more work..together. Also, there is no doubt the evasiveness/quick releases of the backups showed up in the lack of sacks. Willy has to pick up that aspect of the game. Is it just a coincidence that Sask., with Sunseri and Doege in the lineup make i.e. look like their offensive line is just average? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted October 20, 2014 Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 SMH I guess they are going to have to give up 0 sacks run for 250 yards and have 350 yard passer before they get any credit around here. It was there best game of the season. Cotton scored a touchdown by running thru a hole in the middle of the Oline. Once again, Cotton scored a touchdown by running thru a hole in the middle of the Oline. Not by bouncing it to the outside or by slipping into the next layer and catching a screen. Running thru a hole in the middle of the Oline. No one's claiming we just witnessed the second coming of Walby and crew, but if people need to work that hard to come up with reasons why the Oline wasn't better Saturday night, even just slightly, they made up their minds before the game was ever played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted October 20, 2014 Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 I hope we may have found a couple tackles but have a feeling the success was due more to Brohm and Marve than anything. I have been saying all year the Willy holds the ball too long and does not move well enough in the pocket to play that way. Willy moves around in the pocket fine, trouble is that when he tries to step up into the pocket there's no pocket there. He has been hit so much he started hanging onto the ball rather than throwing it, that happens when a qb takes a beating and the pocket breaks down to that extent. Brohm isn't shell shocked yet so he was still willing to take a hit to make the throw, but it got him on the IR too so what do you do? Marve being a more mobile qb does change things and provide a different element, but you can also game plan to limit the running and then force a guy to beat you with his arm so we will have to see what he does once teams get a read on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted October 20, 2014 Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 Marve made the Oline and Cotton look better. Brohm made the Oline look better becuase of how quickly he made decisions. The Oline is still is a major issue, although as of late I've been thinking.............. IMO Edmonton's Oline was worse than Winnipeg's last season and they look a lot better this year with pretty much the same talent, is that a credit to McAdoo and Himebauch ? If so are Winnipeg issues solely based on talent or coaching yet again or a combination of both ? Consider that with Reilly EE already have the QB mobility that we witnessed for the first time tonight. This makes the O-lines job easier and the attacking D's job harder. Reilly isn't running for his life or getting hit like he was last season, so what the difference between this and last season in Edmonton ? Consequences? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted October 20, 2014 Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 I really like this O-line...gives us solid Canadian depth too: LT - Daniels (Import) LG - Greaves (Canadian) C - Morley (Canadian) RG - Goossen (Canadian) RT - Tyler (Import) Backups - Neufeld & Hinse (both can play all 3 line spots) PR - Howard, Jones, Knapp Gone - January I sit behind the Bombers bench and I really liked Daniels leadership qualities...very vocal and positive with his teammates. 2015 TC - this plus a new draft pick or two and maybe a NI FA if we're lucky... and Howard, Jones, and Knapp can be added to the gone list... Swiston can come back too... I guess he's stuck around this long for a reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now