Per 3downnation, these are our free agents ... basically everyone but Zach, Vaval, Peterson, Clercius, Randolph, Wallace, Pokey Wilson, MCI, Allen, T. Jones, and Leroux the longsnapper.  

Quarterback

Chris Streveler (A)

Running back

Brady Oliveira (N)

Receiver

Kody Case (A)
Nic Demski (N)
Dillon Mitchell (A)
Dalton Schoen (A)
Jerreth Sterns (A)
Keric Wheatfall (A)

OL

Stanley Bryant (A)
Tui Eli (N)
Chris Kolankowski (N)
Eric Lofton (A)
Patrick Neufeld (N)

Defensive line

Willie Jefferson (A)
Cameron Lawson (N)
Tanner Schmekel (N)
Jake Thomas (N)
James Vaughters (A)
Jamal Woods (A)

Linebacker

Tanner Cadwallader (N)
Shayne Gauthier (N)
Kyrie Wilson (A)

Defensive back

Terrell Bonds (A)
Michael Griffin II (A)
Nick Hallett (N)
Evan Holm (A)
Demerio Houston (A)
Redha Kramdi (N)
Enock Makonzo (N)
Deatrick Nichols (A)
Jamal Parker (A)

Specialist

Sergio Castillo (A)
Jamieson Sheahan (G)

Edited November 12, 2025Nov 12 by johnzo

23 hours ago, GCn20 said:

Actually what started all of this was exactly that. Piggy suggested we move Stan to OG to get more years out of him. I thought that idea to be pretty stupid and still do.

Actually ,you lie. I said inside........NEVER once said Guard. 

1 hour ago, Piggy 1 said:

Actually ,you lie. I said inside........NEVER once said Guard. 

Ok...so you meant centre only then? Even worse. I was giving you the benefit of doubt because moving to OG is about the only position where Stan should ever line up besides Tackle.  Planning on moving Stan to Centre would be a massive mistake by management and coaching of epic proportions. I would fire both if that is the best plan at Centre they can execute. Anyone suggesting that Stan would automatically make a good Centre, I would ask them what evidence they have he can execute snaps effectively. Sorry even to a GOAT OT like Stan this may not be an area he excels. I've never seen any evidence he can snap the ball so why would I ever assume he would easily pick it up. Most guys don't.

2 hours ago, Booch said:

JT still wanted to play tho...so not really on his terms...so we threw him a bone essentially 

As for Stan...he played just fineast yr and if he back he stays where he is...only change i could see is him and Randolph flipping

He's earned the right to.come back and compete and show he still has it..and if he doesn't I can see him doing a Miller on the 6 game all yr or on the PR at full salary just in case and be that veteran presence to guide our young tackles and quasi coach 

All that said...ive seen nothing to indicate he is not still in the top tier of tackles...last yr for a good majority of our offence cant be viewed as for what it appeared...we were facked from day1 

I completely agree. All this discussion is for nothing. Stan is still rock solid at OT.

Edited January 15Jan 15 by GCn20

2 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Logan looked like ass when he got into the lineup, whatever his injury was surely impacted him cause prior he was a pretty explosive guy.

In fairness to Logan, he never really got many return chances. I don't know if he is crap or not but I wouldn't base it on the dozen chances he had to return last year. Vaval stole his job and Logan was never really in the mix afterwards.

17 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

In fairness to Logan, he never really got many return chances. I don't know if he is crap or not but I wouldn't base it on the dozen chances he had to return last year. Vaval stole his job and Logan was never really in the mix afterwards.

I think his injury was still an issue and was hurried back before really ready...where have we seen that before and it was affecting his explosiveness, and to me looked like it was still in his head and was self preserving

Dude wouldnt have lost it all over one off-season. He was also misused/basically neglected on the offence as he could have added a nice lil element if integrated into the system...but the OC and the in no rush to hire a a legit OC last yr was reason for that and we settld for a guy who isnt qualified to run a Prep School offence....and not sure what spots we still need to fill, but Osh's "in no rush" to hire anyone is just more par for the course...hopefully that attitude is the last hold over with him for 2026 and he truly seen the errors as he claimed and is gonna be more hands on and fix things...Thankfully Walter's smartened up and took 2 dead weight anchors away from the equation for TC

12 minutes ago, Booch said:

I think his injury was still an issue and was hurried back before really ready...where have we seen that before and it was affecting his explosiveness, and to me looked like it was still in his head and was self preserving

Dude wouldnt have lost it all over one off-season. He was also misused/basically neglected on the offence as he could have added a nice lil element if integrated into the system...but the OC and the in no rush to hire a a legit OC last yr was reason for that and we settld for a guy who isnt qualified to run a Prep School offence....and not sure what spots we still need to fill, but Osh's "in no rush" to hire anyone is just more par for the course...hopefully that attitude is the last hold over with him for 2026 and he truly seen the errors as he claimed and is gonna be more hands on and fix things...Thankfully Walter's smartened up and took 2 dead weight anchors away from the equation for TC

Yes, KW seems like he might show up this offseason. Fingers crossed.

13 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

Yes, KW seems like he might show up this offseason. Fingers crossed.

seems like it....i like his approach this yr for sure, tho some the money seems a bit out there, but maybe he knows that he was X amount more to use this yr so it's just the new norm...Tho I sure all the signings pre 2026 have money on the 2025 books, so the actual 2026 hit wont be what it seems....

I just want him this yr to have 1..2 targets in FA that will be no doubt about it upgrades and do what it takes..we def have the resources to do so, and playing nice the last 3 yrs...well that didnt pan out...time to be greasy lol

20 minutes ago, Booch said:

seems like it....i like his approach this yr for sure, tho some the money seems a bit out there, but maybe he knows that he was X amount more to use this yr so it's just the new norm...Tho I sure all the signings pre 2026 have money on the 2025 books, so the actual 2026 hit wont be what it seems....

I just want him this yr to have 1..2 targets in FA that will be no doubt about it upgrades and do what it takes..we def have the resources to do so, and playing nice the last 3 yrs...well that didnt pan out...time to be greasy lol

I agree. The interview with him sounds like he will be active in FA, so let's hope it's for stud players not scraps like last year.

10 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

I agree. The interview with him sounds like he will be active in FA, so let's hope it's for stud players not scraps like last year.

I think he learned that lesson hard last yr

I'm really curious as to what our draft strategy is this yr...

bc cut hendrix he’d be a great get at a reasonable deal 

16 hours ago, Booch said:

I think he learned that lesson hard last yr

I'm really curious as to what our draft strategy is this yr...

Will all depend on who is available come draft time I would think, but KW should be thinking about rebuilding our NAT talent at the LOS for sure.

12 hours ago, wbbfan said:

bc cut hendrix he’d be a great get at a reasonable deal 

Those big contracts to Rourke & extending Keon Hatcher gonna cause some good playerrs not to be renewed. 

3 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Those big contracts to Rourke  Collaros & extending Keon Hatcher Brady gonna cause some good players not to be renewed. 

FIFY

2 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

FIFY

What good players. People spend all season going on about how changes need to be made then off season is we gonna lose some good players. Who. 

17 hours ago, wbbfan said:

bc cut hendrix he’d be a great get at a reasonable deal 

I don't know about the reasonable deal thought. IIRC he was released after 2024 in Hamilton due to a large bonus payment coming due. Now the same happens in Vancouver. However IMO he'd be an upgrade and we should speak with his agent to see what his expectations might be.

 

 

 

 

I didn't have Cobb re upping high on my list but he's decent depth and likely cheap.

Good signing really...proven National depth...proven returner as a backup in a pinch with in game injury...can run jet.....Far better player than Corcorran who if we draft well and or grab a National in FA should never see the roster

Edited January 16Jan 16 by Booch

On 2026-01-13 at 10:32 AM, SpeedFlex27 said:

You just answered your own question...

how exactly??  If you’re looking at two QBs and they are both equally injury proned and uninspiring you’d obviously rather have the one that’s younger and cheaper.  So I repeat.  You’d be against that swap why?  

 

55 minutes ago, Noeller said:

 

 

nothing wrong with this one... if we can add a FA or draft that can help our depth or starters... should be a solid group.  

1 hour ago, Blue In BC said:

I don't know about the reasonable deal thought. IIRC he was released after 2024 in Hamilton due to a large bonus payment coming due. Now the same happens in Vancouver. However IMO he'd be an upgrade and we should speak with his agent to see what his expectations might be.

 

 

i’d be good with giving him a nice upfront bonus then a lower base salary. if any thing, he should be leery of back end deals and off season bonuses 

37 minutes ago, Booch said:

Good signing really...proven National depth...proven returner as a backup in a pinch with in game injury...can run jet.....Far better player than Corcorran who if we draft well and or grab a National in FA should never see the roster

yeah i like him as a depth canadian. a lot better than corcantrun. we need ni talent at wr, free back up kr is good too 

 Time to get a Cobb jersey and matching hat! 

2 hours ago, Noeller said:

 

 

I would say there is a kernel of truth in this, but it would sound corny and I would be creamed in comments. But he is husk-y.

10 minutes ago, Tracker said:

I would say there is a kernel of truth in this, but it would sound corny and I would be creamed in comments. But he is husk-y.

I hope he gets an opportunity to really pop this year...

As a backup he’s fine. Better to have a guy with some speed at least instead of the Corcoran’s and Jeremy MurphY’s of the world. 

1 hour ago, Tracker said:

I would say there is a kernel of truth in this, but it would sound corny and I would be creamed in comments. But he is husk-y.

hopefully he can navigate the maize of training camp 

 

26 minutes ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

As a backup he’s fine. Better to have a guy with some speed at least instead of the Corcoran’s and Jeremy MurphY’s of the world. 

and although somewhat liited in attempts he avaeraged over 10 yards a PR and 21 a kickoff...so as in in gae replacement he wont just bobble and drop for no gain....so that depth is nice and especially with his National status...and yes he does have some wheeels on him and has to be accounted for out there