Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Nolby said:

Someone needs to step up today, and Zach needs to have a much better game.

 

LFG!!!!!!!

Yes, Zach could and should do better, but unless he can walk on water, no way we are going to win unless the defence plays better say, by about 1000%. 

Posted

Gonna have to ride BO until the wheels fall off tonight...That offensive group of receivers will strike no fear in anyione and it will be easy for stamps to basically eliminate our 2 best threats...and ZC cant be his hit or miss self...he needs to be ZC circa 2019-early 2022 or be sat down and or spelled off for multiple series a game and get Strev more acclimated....

And seeing we have 3 ends...real ends....and a more than capable Adams and Lawson we need to see them let loose...attacking and in heavy rotation...if Jake never saw the field we would look better than we have in yrs

Posted

do we reclaim first?

Keys to win....coaching do your job...be it player usage...adjustments...coaching with some brass balls , utilizing rules afforded to you....yanking guys who have turned up the suck....do your damn job

Let the defence loose upfront with your best athletes and bring the heat

BO....Nuff said as our receivers are not gonna be a difference maker unless 2015 ZC shows up

Posted

Keys to the game, 

OL play. Vanterpool at LT is going to be a big change. It’s a tall order to keep zach clean with out big stan. But should help the run game. 
 

 big plays. Calgary killed us quickly and early with big plays, while we checked down and took yards short of the first. We need to flip that around today. 
 

Ball security. From bobbling returns to tossing picks we gotta do a better job of protecting the rock.

 

players to watch, person, vanterpool, case, Brady, bridges, vaval, zach, and Demski. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Booch said:

Gonna have to ride BO until the wheels fall off tonight...That offensive group of receivers will strike no fear in anyione and it will be easy for stamps to basically eliminate our 2 best threats...and ZC cant be his hit or miss self...he needs to be ZC circa 2019-early 2022 or be sat down and or spelled off for multiple series a game and get Strev more acclimated....

And seeing we have 3 ends...real ends....and a more than capable Adams and Lawson we need to see them let loose...attacking and in heavy rotation...if Jake never saw the field we would look better than we have in yrs

Just for laughs, what if Case has an amazing game and surprises the heck out of everyone? Nah 😉

Also, even with DS in there, was our receiver corps terrifying defences?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bomberguy said:

Just for laughs, what if Case has an amazing game and surprises the heck out of everyone? Nah 😉

Then good for us...but cant see him doing anything amazing....and of he does....is it a one off or his actually skill?....but we need bigger receievers with a different skill set for ZC to be succesful

I guess tho Strev has familiarity with him, but Strev never gets reps so thats irrelevant too

Posted
Just now, Booch said:

Then good for us...but cant see him doing anything amazing....and of he does....is it a one off or his actually skill?....but we need bigger receievers with a different skill set for ZC to be succesful

I guess tho Strev has familiarity with him, but Strev never gets reps so thats irrelevant too

Coach said he had a great camp, what isn’t said is how well he runs routes, gets open, and catches the ball.

Posted

The only thing we can look at IMO is that team told us last year how great of returner he is. We saw him do that and they quickly replaced him with an aging Lucky. Zach likes his work ethic. I have a good work ethic too but no one wants me out there playing receiver on Friday night 😆

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bomberguy said:

The only thing we can look at IMO is that team told us last year how great of returner he is. We saw him do that and they quickly replaced him with an aging Lucky. Zach likes his work ethic. I have a good work ethic too but no one wants me out there playing receiver on Friday night 😆

maybe you would be a real possesion guy?...hahaha

They all should have a good work ethis at this level....if thats all ZC has to say then whoopity do.....and we all have heard Osh say "they all are starter material"...which we know is total B.S so a lot of what comes out of his yaphole should not really be takem for any value

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Booch said:

maybe you would be a real possesion guy?...hahaha

They all should have a good work ethis at this level....if thats all ZC has to say then whoopity do.....and we all have heard Osh say "they all are starter material"...which we know is total B.S so a lot of what comes out of his yaphole should not really be takem for any value

I guess almost being charged with possession doesn’t count? 😁

Edited by Bomberguy
Posted
1 hour ago, Booch said:

do we reclaim first?

Keys to win....coaching do your job...be it player usage...adjustments...coaching with some brass balls , utilizing rules afforded to you....yanking guys who have turned up the suck....do your damn job

Let the defence loose upfront with your best athletes and bring the heat

BO....Nuff said as our receivers are not gonna be a difference maker unless 2015 ZC shows up

Not sure that getting into a sprint to 50 points with Adams & Co is a good strategy. Giving Oliviera 25 touches to win is going to be tough as the Stamps can stack the box. Gotta have a credible passing game or else.

Posted

QB play and to an extent receivers...our group is even weaker now...so how does that effect ZC

I agree tho...our dline needs to be better...hopefully adding Person...maybe another piece next week and reducing snaps for some slugs may start to help

Posted
15 minutes ago, Brandon said:

We didn't lose last game because of "receivers".    What we need is pressure up front from the d-line and a cleaner game by Zach.  

Calgary averaged 12.3 yards per completion. We averaged 6. In the cfl you need that atleast around 8-10. Calgary had 4 players with atleast 1 big play. We had 1 big ish play and it was from Brady. Brady was our 3rd leading wr. Schoen and wheatfall combined to go 5/13 for 55 yards. 
 I didn’t see zach missing guys in running open either. 
 

Zach needs to be better, the play call needs to be better, and the WRs need to be better. I think it starts and ends with hogan. We didn’t adjust to Calgary taking way the deep shot, or how they blanketed the under stuff. A lot of shallow flood concept and similar. Not much pa, seam busters, timing routes, etc. 

21 minutes ago, Booch said:

QB play and to an extent receivers...our group is even weaker now...so how does that effect ZC

I agree tho...our dline needs to be better...hopefully adding Person...maybe another piece next week and reducing snaps for some slugs may start to help

We need to force some bad decisions from vaj. That isn’t gonna happen if he’s un disrupted, un pressured and facing a predictable game plan. 
 

Lawson and adams can create disruption. I’d love to see them on the field with person for some reps. Put em with either end, preferably who ever is more fresh. 

Posted
1 minute ago, wbbfan said:

Calgary averaged 12.3 yards per completion. We averaged 6. In the cfl you need that atleast around 8-10. Calgary had 4 players with atleast 1 big play. We had 1 big ish play and it was from Brady. Brady was our 3rd leading wr. Schoen and wheatfall combined to go 5/13 for 55 yards. 
 I didn’t see zach missing guys in running open either. 
 

Zach needs to be better, the play call needs to be better, and the WRs need to be better. I think it starts and ends with hogan. We didn’t adjust to Calgary taking way the deep shot, or how they blanketed the under stuff. A lot of shallow flood concept and similar. Not much pa, seam busters, timing routes, etc. 

we definately got out schemed and didnt make any adjustments....and with who we running out tonight I not sure what to expect.....we had a good 2 weeks to prepare and saw more film on CGY...So lets see if we figured things out...or if its just good ol status quo pounding square pegs in round holes

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Brandon said:

We didn't lose last game because of "receivers".    What we need is pressure up front from the d-line and a cleaner game by Zach.  

We lost as a team so that includes the receiving core.

Posted

on a positive not...stoked that person gets on...hopefully he gets a lot of snaps to get into the flow of a CFL game...not 4 or 5 snaps while the usual slugs eat up reps......and safe to say I am shocked as all hell Osh made the actual move

Posted
10 minutes ago, Booch said:

we definately got out schemed and didnt make any adjustments....and with who we running out tonight I not sure what to expect.....we had a good 2 weeks to prepare and saw more film on CGY...So lets see if we figured things out...or if its just good ol status quo pounding square pegs in round holes

 

If what we’ve seen continues, in a month at the latest we should promote Jackson. Don’t need to fire or demote hogan in title, Jackson could become the offensive QC. 
 I’m pulling for hogan, but right now he seems far off being ready for all that OC entails. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...