BomberfanMKS

the after game interview with Streveler on 680 was telling... Strevs talked like he sucked and got carried by the team... kicking himself for missing the deep shots to Woli... I think that kind of attitude makes for a guy who is only going to get better

the after game interview with Streveler on 680 was telling... Strevs talked like he sucked and got carried by the team... kicking himself for missing the deep shots to Woli... I think that kind of attitude makes for a guy who is only going to get better

Streveler with only 186 yards passing... what a bum

he's playing well... that pick was on Demski or Lapo... outside of the pic he's been hot 

If Watson wasn't getting constantly injured back when he was with us there is a good chance he'd still be a bomber 

If Watson wasn't getting constantly injured back when he was with us there is a good chance he'd still be a bomber 

Nah man... 52 years old and you get the wiry looking muscles that look really ripply

Unless he has proof that the supplement was tainted (I.E. he still has some that he hasn't taken and can get it tested) naming what he took is basically inviting a lawsuit from the manufacturer of the supplement.
You don't go making highly public, negative statements about a commercial product without proof that your statements are factual.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Yeh watch the media availability... unless Harris is one hell of an actor/liar he really comes across as sincerely believing he got unlucky with a bad supplement.

Note - He won't say what he took exactly because he can't prove that's where the contamination came from and the manufacturer could sue him for defamation if he called them out.  He'd have no recourse naming them without explicit proof.

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional.
Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating?
 
IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment".  He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.

Yeh watch the media availability... unless Harris is one hell of an actor/liar he really comes across as sincerely believing he got unlucky with a bad supplement.

Note - He won't say what he took exactly because he can't prove that's where the contamination came from and the manufacturer could sue him for defamation if he called them out.  He'd have no recourse naming them without explicit proof.

Yeh watch the media availability... unless Harris is one hell of an actor/liar he really comes across as sincerely believing he got unlucky with a bad supplement.

Note - He won't say what he took exactly because he can't prove that's where the contamination came from and the manufacturer could sue him for defamation if he called them out.  He'd have no recourse naming them without explicit proof.

Yeh watch the media availability... unless Harris is one hell of an actor/liar he really comes across as sincerely believing he got unlucky with a bad supplement.

Note - He won't say what he took exactly because he can't prove that's where the contamination came from and the manufacturer could sue him for defamation if he called them out.  He'd have no recourse naming them without explicit proof.

Gotta say - Even though he's lost a bunch of games MBT has been surprisingly decent this season.  

Both of his last two losses have been reasonably good outings (200 yards passing, 38 rushing with 2 TD's and 0 INTS against EDM's defense earning 26 points is good enough to win if your other two phases make it a game).

Makes the decision in TO more difficult when guys get healthy

He's had what 2-3 drops so far... his passing stats look a fair bit different if the guys were holding onto the ball
 
I also would only give him 50% fault for the Matthews long bomb... it was a good 50/50 shot to take and he put it in a spot that matthews could have won the ball (which is what you ask for on those plays)
 

Go for a punt out the back of the endzone I think

Who needs passing yards when you put up 200 yards of rushing

Jesus... just ramming the ball down their throats this drive

He's had what 2-3 drops so far... his passing stats look a fair bit different if the guys were holding onto the ball
 
I also would only give him 50% fault for the Matthews long bomb... it was a good 50/50 shot to take and he put it in a spot that matthews could have won the ball (which is what you ask for on those plays)