Pete Catan's Ghost

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

I know that LimJahey isn't the only one who has written McDuffie off. There are some around here that aren't big fans. Just count me as someone who sees great potential in him. Quick, fast, slippery, and even strong in a 5 foot 8 frame. He actually plays bigger than he is. That's what I see.

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

McDuffie looked anything but useless at today's practice.
The most noticeable drop was by Denmark. Now that's a guy who is useless!

Like it or leave it, the writer provides fairly in-depth rationale for his decisions. There aren't too many that do.
Also, it's the first time I've read an actual assessment of Foketi's play. I paid little attention to him during the game and thought that because we ran the ball well and gave up no sacks that he must have been decent.
I think that generally, this is a good read.

Like it or leave it, the writer provides fairly in-depth rationale for his decisions. There aren't too many that do.
Also, it's the first time I've read an actual assessment of Foketi's play. I paid little attention to him during the game and thought that because we ran the ball well and gave up no sacks that he must have been decent.
I think that generally, this is a good read.

Like it or leave it, the writer provides fairly in-depth rationale for his decisions. There aren't too many that do.
Also, it's the first time I've read an actual assessment of Foketi's play. I paid little attention to him during the game and thought that because we ran the ball well and gave up no sacks that he must have been decent.
I think that generally, this is a good read.

Thanks for this.

Like it or leave it, the writer provides fairly in-depth rationale for his decisions. There aren't too many that do.
Also, it's the first time I've read an actual assessment of Foketi's play. I paid little attention to him during the game and thought that because we ran the ball well and gave up no sacks that he must have been decent.
I think that generally, this is a good read.

They are both receivers.
 

Like it or leave it, the writer provides fairly in-depth rationale for his decisions. There aren't too many that do.
Also, it's the first time I've read an actual assessment of Foketi's play. I paid little attention to him during the game and thought that because we ran the ball well and gave up no sacks that he must have been decent.
I think that generally, this is a good read.

The crux of this trade proposal is not about who is your most resilient player. it's that it only needs to last for the remainder of this year. Either QB could be traded/cut/ or restructured at year end.
Who would you rather have as your relief guy for a championship run in 2016...Durant or Willy?

Reread your entire wishlist and then rethink how much you want this job.

Reread your entire wishlist and then rethink how much you want this job.

Hell, we'll throw in Pavelec....

Throw in Neufeld to offset the salary and to provide DW that much needed protection he will require in Sasky.

Love that Pederson is being called out in this article. 
He's a Rider sychophant who runs the Sasky masses into a lather with his bizarro-world conspiracy claims.
If only H & L would use some other Regina media person than him for their corn fed interviews. He's a transparent shill who would do well to remove the straw from his teeth before he makes any future unfounded accusations

Love that Pederson is being called out in this article. 
He's a Rider sychophant who runs the Sasky masses into a lather with his bizarro-world conspiracy claims.
If only H & L would use some other Regina media person than him for their corn fed interviews. He's a transparent shill who would do well to remove the straw from his teeth before he makes any future unfounded accusations

Love that Pederson is being called out in this article. 
He's a Rider sychophant who runs the Sasky masses into a lather with his bizarro-world conspiracy claims.
If only H & L would use some other Regina media person than him for their corn fed interviews. He's a transparent shill who would do well to remove the straw from his teeth before he makes any future unfounded accusations

I was just over at Rider Fans checking out the delusional posting that is going on over there after reading about it here. After reading one thread in particular it really made me appreciate (again) how great MBB and the mods are. The way this forum is moderated is so superior to RF it ain't even funny. Here the rules are applied fairly (IMO) and when things get out of hand the reaction is swift. At RF, it seems like the rules only apply to posters who are critical of the Rider organization and/or are perceived to be fans of other teams. Anyone who posts anything perceived to be negative is labelled a "troll" and can be called every name in the book without the mods stepping in while the so-called "troll" will be banned at the drop of a hat even when what they post is factually correct. 
Again, thank you to everyone - admin, mods and posters - for making this such a great place to post.