Jump to content

Logan007

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,859

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Logan007

  3. Free Agent Frenzy

    in Blue Bomber Discussion

    Posted

    21 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    I didn't see very much change in play calling between Streveler and Nichols.   I saw one qb being hesitant and dumping it off and the other qb making much quicker decisions and had the arm strength to "knife" it in to guys like Wolly and Thompkins.  Far to much last season did we see  Nichols struggle throwing balls around the 10 yard mark where a receiver would be in stride and could catch the ball and gather some YAC.  From what I watched guys had to dive or go to the ground to make any catches giving them no chance to turning it up field.  Streveler was light years better at throwing to guys in stride. 

     

    I do agree though that we run way to many passes that suit Nichols where it's a quick dump off and hope that the guy can break a tackle and make it 10 yards.    I'd like to see more plays that they used to do with Khari where he chucked it up and let the receivers either make or break the play. 

    I'd like to just see plays where Lapo let's Nichols throw 10+ yards rather then the 5 or less.

  6. The Gender Pay Gap

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    On 2019-02-09 at 3:56 PM, wanna-b-fanboy said:

    Well, if this doesn't smack of racism for you then I don't know what to say. 

     

    So you go and defend this tweet as not even a hint of racism- then you go ahead and admonish Senator Sinclair for  being offended by it. dafuq man? 

     

    This is the tweet he was explaining about before Re: the Indian comment.  The post that I made.

  7. The Gender Pay Gap

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    45 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said:

    I will go and give him a fair shake and check him out. 

     

    Agreed, maybe he's not, but when you lump him in with Mark should've and Milo, and that tweet from Murray- I did jump to conclusions. 

    That tweet though., was racist.

    Technically it's not.  The lady at the bar wanted to be called an Indian and not a Native American.  So blame her for him calling her what she asked him to call her.

    People complained when he wouldn't call trans people by their made up pronoun, and now they're complaining when he calls someone the name of the race she wants to be called and everyone is triggered by it because most Natives don't like the being called that.  It's like the whole Edmonton Eskimo's thing.  Most Inuit's don't care if they use the term, there's only a very small minority who do, but SJW's come out of the woodwork to defend the small minority because VICTIMS!

    But if you were to see what he said as an outsider, I can understand why people would think he was being racist.

  8. The Gender Pay Gap

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    1 hour ago, wanna-b-fanboy said:

    That is exactly what you are doing. 

     

    "Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds, the point at which effectively the discussion or thread often ends."

     

    Well done- you beat them to the punch. 

     

    Who like Murray SInclair?

     

     

    Wow- jordan peterson, milo yiannopoulos and mark shouldice- you really should look them up before you defend them and berate those that are critical of them. 

    Apparently you take everything at face value and don't look into what the tweet meant.  Did you happen to read the explanation behind why he said another Indian stole his bottle?

     

    DUulPJ8W0AEPVGG.jpg:large

     

    You people are really sad to attack Jordan Peterson.  What you're saying is slander.  He's not a white supremacist, like AT ALL.  And I'm sure KBF has watched and read many things on him as have I.  Maybe it's YOU who needs to look them up in a biased way instead of just reading stupid tweets about him and judging him that way.  He's an incredibly intelligent and open minded guy if you actually listen to him.  But I doubt you'll do that because you'd rather just label him as you already have and want to see him as some "evildoer".  I'm sure you probably think the Jewish Ben Shapiro is a white supremacist nazi too.

    Sometimes some of you people make me sad at the lack of open mindedness you have.  You spout off about Feminism and accepting of LBGT community, etc... yet you close your minds down at anything that goes against those far left beliefs.

    And those of you who are bringing Climate Change into this thread.  All you're trying to do is discredit KBF and whoever else by bringing up something that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.  Usually people do that when they are losing an argument.

     

    Uggh...I didn't want to post in this thread, but your comments are turning into such BS that I couldn't stay out.

  11. The Star Trek Thread!

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Yup, agree with most of your points.  I like the guy playing Sarek, but agree with you that he needs to be more cold and logical.  He's acting more like how I think Spock should act.

     

    I love Michelle as well, but she's getting her own show so I wish they'd make the story line involve new characters we haven't seen before instead of bringing back old characters all the time.  That's what I liked about the old series.  They were always fresh and different.

  12. The Star Trek Thread!

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Well, has anyone else watched the first episode of Discovery?  Was pretty good.  I like the small amounts of humor they through in.  Sometimes though, it feels so dramatic at times because of the way they film it, or because of their grim facial expressions that I'm sometimes like..."did they just make a joke?  Yes that was a joke...hey that was pretty funny actually".  I liked the guy who plays Pike.  Them going through the minefield of rocks with those little glass bubbles kind of lost it for me though...had to really suspend disbelief for that one.  Otherwise it was an overall decent episode.

    Not liking that they're bringing back Michelle Yeoh.  I liked her character, but it just feels like they're going back to her too soon.  Move the story forward.  Stop bringing back old characters.  But I also haven't seen the episode yet so maybe my mind will change.

  13. Upcoming Movies

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    9 hours ago, Brandon said:

    Because I suck and don't have twitter I will paste what Leslie Jones had tweeted in regards to the new Ghostbusters movie:

     

    I assume her potential future deals for movies may have shrunk because of that outburst...

    She talks like she has a 5th grade education.

     

    Actually that's not true, my 10 year old in the 5th grade talks better then she does.

  16. Upcoming Movies

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    25 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    Jason Reitman will be directing and it will follow in the original universe of Ghostbusters 1 and 2.    No mention of who will be in the movie but confirmed the ladies will not be in it at all.  

     

    This is what it should have been.  I could care less if there are women in it, but the torch should be passed on, not just a reimaging of the damn movie beat for beat almost.  And I hope they use practical effects instead of all CGI because that new one just looked like absolute ass.  All the ghosts looked to clean and fake.  And lastly, I hope they have a good story and decent jokes.

×
×
  • Create New...