Brandon

Once we clinch a spot then I'd like for the remaining games that they mix it up similar to how Streveler would come in and give McGuire several series per game. I'm ok with losing some games at the end of the year.

I officially will admit that I was wrong in saying Noeller as Nasty Nate level of trolling , I retract my previous statement and apologize to Noeller and 17to85 and officially give the Nasty Nate Heavyweight Trolling Belt to TBURGESS.

Buck Pierce for calling a great game Stove had pressure all night Brady with a partial credit to the o-line when they were doing running plays they made some nice holes. HH - Houston had a solid game HH#2 - Zach facing the pressure and getting the ball out quickly. With Nichols we would of had at least 5 - 8 sacks against us. ZC would of been a top 3 if not for those 2 dreadful passes. Concerns - Moutarda still doesn't look right and the kickoff going out of bounds gave Edmonton prime field position for a field goal. Legs also isn't that great coffin cornering his punts.

200 yards running, 200 yards passing.... they put up 30 points (would of been 40 if not for Mourtada sucking).... and you think this is bad? Today they put up 26 points (29 if not for Mourtada) and have 150+ yards running and 200 yards passing with 2 passing TD's and this is bad? I like how the standards for Collaros having an average game needs to be him throwing for 300+ yards while Harris/Brady runs for 200 yards in order for you to say the team looked decent. Yet in 2018-2019 you were more then satisfied with Matt Nichols throwing for 150 yards with maybe one or two passes over 20 yards in length and as long as the team won regardless of how they got the win ... that offense was amazing because Matt Nichols had 150 yards and may have pushed the ball deep once or twice at most. Show me an offense in which every single game they have Tecmo Super Bowl like numbers in which they score 6 TD's and throw zero ints and don't have some mistakes with all the good plays?

The Alford pick 6 near the beginning the team had massive pressure on Harris and he lobbed a ball in a panic, Alford cut back and made a great play and only dropped the ball (probably from looking at the end zone). So what you are saying is on that play our defense was crap because Alford dropped the ball? Completely negating the fact that our d-line had massive penetration and the secondary went to the right place in the field? Bombers offense has been kinda poor in the pass game.... this is coming from someone who white knighted heavy for Matt Nichols for years.... Collaros was sacked 0 times, had 200+ yards passing and only one interception. Nichols had how many games where he was sacked 3 - 5 times and less then 200 yards passing in a game. Forget not the Bombers had nearly 200 yards rushing last week???? I know Noeller is your friend but yikes..... Also didn't Collaros toss for over 400 yards the week prior to that? So to get this straight.... Bombers win 30 - 3 with 400+ yards of offense... while holding the opposition to 200 yards of total offense.... while having 14 more minutes of time of possession.... this equals poor showing in Noeller and 17to85's books?

I like how you say Edmonton was atrocious... could it be possible that our defense was so lights out that Edmonton was just completely run over by a superior team? We ran for almost 200 yards... you are saying that was pure luck? The fact that we dropped 2 easy pick 6 TD's and Moutarda left 10 points on the board because he couldn't kick, Collaros makes one bad throw in the end zone.... that's 31 points that we left off the board. We still won 30- 3!@!@!@ I'm absolutely blown away that you would suggest we played poorly last week? This is Nasty Nate level of crazyness/trolling.

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? This week the team was off, but last game that team was probably the most dominant football we have ever played on defense. Last week we could of EASILY had 60 points if a few things such as two sure fire pick-6's that were dropped and one sloppy Zach throw in the end zone. If we play as good as we did last week we will 99% of the time. Very odd statement to make.

#53 whiffed on the block badly

LOL I guess they answered my question

Do you think they mention Rod Black leaving at all tonight?

Thank you wind

FINALLY lol

Will Moutarda miss a lengthy kick?

Missing tackles... bad throws. Team is not looking like they are taking this game seriously.

It was under thrown

My point is that Winkler has a lot of weird people stuck in a bizarro world. It has rampant racism, homophobia, over the top religious people, rednecks on par with the finest MAGA folks and overall lots of bizarre behaviour that you do not find for the most part across the province. You asked what the hell is wrong with these people, if you had been to Winkler before you would of already known the answer.

So you are familiar with what many people are like in Winkler then....

Have you ever been to Winkler?

I don't see the need for Arbuckle, at this point we invested a few years in McGuire so why take on a huge salary for a guy who would need time to learn our system?

Hey at this point he can run a sneak and lob a deep bomb... he's already better then 90% of the QB's we brought in since Kevin Glenn.

A reminder that Bighill and Jefferson stayed with the Bombers for less money. Plus Bighill has his "other" job in town which I assume pays him a nice bonus to stay in Winnipeg. I'd say guys like Jeffcoat will be hard to keep.

I do remember going to one game and they had a fan kicking field goals to win prizes and they had a cheer leader boot a 30 yard field goal with ease... the dude in the contest tries from 30 yards and the balls barely even goes 10 yards down field... I never seen a man shrink so small in front of a crowd of 25 000 people lol.

McGuire definitely has a cannon for an arm so at least worst case scenario he physically can throw deep for 50/50 balls.

Because I'm out of the loop.... Canadians would have to still quarantine once they came back from driving down to the States right?