Jump to content

Slimy Sculpin

Members
  • Posts

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin reacted to Mike in 3 turds plus crappy honker. Long winter edition.   
    That deep ball right off the bat with Zach testing out the glove hand has to go down as one of the dumbest ******* things I’ve ever seen.
    And if that’s not coaching, I don’t know what it is. That should be so quickly addressed on the sideline before they take the field. Hey man, you’ve never worn that thing before, let’s feel it out before we sling it deep.
  2. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from JohnnyAbonny in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  3. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from BigBlueFanatic in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  4. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Fatty Liver in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  5. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from bigg jay in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  6. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from rebusrankin in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  7. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Noeller in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  8. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from 17to85 in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    Done deal for Buck before the biggest game of the year?At a minimum, wouldn't that be tampering?
  9. Like
    Slimy Sculpin reacted to blue85gold in 3 stars plus HH gc bound! For Ted   
    I didn’t like the defensive roster when it was released but the results speak for themselves. The extra DBs didn’t allow any riders to be open quick and the dline/lbs flustered Harris enough to make him totally ineffective. Riders didn’t have immediate success rushing so they quit on it. D showed good rally the ball to limit the runs (other than one big one)
  10. Like
    Slimy Sculpin reacted to Booch in 3 stars plus HH gc bound! For Ted   
    Gotta give coaching today first star..was  my only real main concern and didn't start out well with the odd roster...but their prep ...scheme and overall game management made it a moot point...
    ZC...earned his pay...showed why he is still the guy you want leading and played his best game in...yrs
    Holm..had an average yr at best...but he was the perfect example of shut down DB tonight...and acted like a pro after a play every time...unlike the arsebags in green
    Shout out to the oline...controlled the play...the l.o.s...got playoff nasty again and were key to the whole thing and it rippled thru the team
     
  11. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin reacted to White Out in Riders at Bombers WF GDT   
    Can we are wear our blue jerseys and gold pants in the Grey Cup for god sakes
  12. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Piggy 1 in Riders at Bombers WF GDT   
    They are pretty competent at running and passing as are the Bombers. A key for me is how well our D-line performs. Can they get pressure on Harris? Does our 3-man front offer any resistence to their run game? (Gotta admit I'm worried about this.) On the other hand, the sell-out crowd will be our 13th man. (This I have confidence in.)
    Go Bombers Go!
  13. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Zach Schnitzer in Riders at Bombers WF GDT   
    They are pretty competent at running and passing as are the Bombers. A key for me is how well our D-line performs. Can they get pressure on Harris? Does our 3-man front offer any resistence to their run game? (Gotta admit I'm worried about this.) On the other hand, the sell-out crowd will be our 13th man. (This I have confidence in.)
    Go Bombers Go!
  14. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from BomberBall. in Riders at Bombers WF Chat   
    Man, I hope you're right about this! A little more motion, misdirection on O, a blitz or two on D, less Thomas and Schmekel on at the same time, and, perhaps some trickery on special teams.
  15. Like
    Slimy Sculpin reacted to SpeedFlex27 in CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread   
    The CFL needs to have a franchise player designation where a team can pay a player independent of the salary cap & it's not affected by it. I mean, this only makes too much common sense which is why Scarf Boy never did it. Or probably never even thought of it.  
  16. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from martypants100 in Riders at Bombers WF Chat   
    Since August 1 (objectively, I believe, when the Bombers' season turned around), I'd say that the two QBs are pretty similar.
    Collaros: 204/283=72.1%, Harris: 190/262=72.5% 
    Collaros:  2613/204=12.8yd/completion, Harris: 2392/190=12.5yd/completion
    Collaros: 1TD for every 20.21 passes attempted, Harris: 1TD for every 20.15 passes attempted
    Collaros: 1INT for every 40.43 passes attempted, Harris: 1INT for every 43.67 passes attempted
    I have no idea how to calculate QB efficiency.
    And,
    Collaros: 9W - 1L, Harris: 4W - 4L (only played in 8 of 11 SK games since Aug. 1)
    I know who I want as my QB on Saturday.
     
     
  17. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Noeller in Riders at Bombers WF Chat   
    Since August 1 (objectively, I believe, when the Bombers' season turned around), I'd say that the two QBs are pretty similar.
    Collaros: 204/283=72.1%, Harris: 190/262=72.5% 
    Collaros:  2613/204=12.8yd/completion, Harris: 2392/190=12.5yd/completion
    Collaros: 1TD for every 20.21 passes attempted, Harris: 1TD for every 20.15 passes attempted
    Collaros: 1INT for every 40.43 passes attempted, Harris: 1INT for every 43.67 passes attempted
    I have no idea how to calculate QB efficiency.
    And,
    Collaros: 9W - 1L, Harris: 4W - 4L (only played in 8 of 11 SK games since Aug. 1)
    I know who I want as my QB on Saturday.
     
     
  18. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Deiter Fan in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Good one. Yes, Buck will have to "buck" that trend, too. I hope that Younger was paying attention to yesterday's game. I saw a lot of ineffective 3-man "rushes" by the Lions. Let's hope that he can come up with a better plan to semi-neutralize Harris.
  19. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin reacted to WinnipegGordo in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Their pants look like they are made by lulu lemon.
  20. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Tracker in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Amd what a stupid play call by Ottawa!
  21. Like
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Starman115 in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Amd what a stupid play call by Ottawa!
  22. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Super Duper Negatron in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Amd what a stupid play call by Ottawa!
  23. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Tracker in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Speaking of not a good look for Ottawa, are there any uglier, cheaper-looking unis than their's?
  24. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from Super Duper Negatron in CFL Semi Final Saturday   
    Speaking of not a good look for Ottawa, are there any uglier, cheaper-looking unis than their's?
  25. Agree
    Slimy Sculpin got a reaction from BigBlueFanatic in Bombers at Als GDT   
    Getting back to the game this past Saturday. That was more than a butt-clencher. In fact, I had given up hope. I'm glad the Bombers won but even as a non-football guy, I have to seriously question some of the coaching decisions. The one that was the biggest head-scratcher for me was playing Schmekel and Thomas at the same time. I didn't count the number of times that they had them out there together but the two times that I noticed, they were totally "swatted away" by Montreal's O-line resulting in big plays for the Alouettes. I'm hoping that when watching the video, the coaches will come to their senses and have a Eureka moment....."Maybe we shouldn't have these guys out there together."
×
×
  • Create New...