Sard

He's been on the sideline the last number of games. 

Hilarious how the panel is backpedalling on all of the hype for Rourke at half time. 

Sadly looks like the ground forced that fumble and it'll be BC ball. 

Where's the no yards?  Was like 3 feet away!
 

Changing the name wasn't why they went multiple seasons without winning a game at home, and that was why people stopped going to games.  It stopped being an entertaining product, and Chris Jones didn't help that at all.
You say woke like it's a bad thing... it's a stupid term, but being culturally sensitive and stopping using a derogatory term for the name of your team is the right thing to do, and should have been done years earlier than it was.

He's got 4 kids, maybe some of them will be involved as well? 

Loved it!!!
Maier just does not seem to have the tools or command presence to lead a team through tough times and Dickenson's antics on the sidelines have to be embarrassing to the players. 

There was space between foot and sideline when he placed his foot...that was clear and undisputeable...when he cut to the inside..it looked like the green had disappeared and possibly his foot touched white..but also possible as he cut the outer portion of his foot was off the ground and above it...either way was not a clear and undisputed proof...and fact no black pellets kicked up from the white stripe tells you he likely didn't touch white...still tho...no iron clad proof to overturn it...so really how could they over rule with their new mandate?

True, but coaches can still plan, and it ended up being a longer week with the game being on Sunday. 
And you know a lot of guys are still thinking football and how to be better. 

True, but coaches can still plan, and it ended up being a longer week with the game being on Sunday. 
And you know a lot of guys are still thinking football and how to be better. 

It's hard to tell if that's a camera issue or if he was actually contacting the ground. Without definitive proof, they shouldn't over turn the call. All the crider tears won't change it, nothing about that play was clear 100%. Keep it as it's called. That's what the command centre should do.
100% right call.

The guidance that the CC was given was to only overturn if it was clear and obvious, and if they have to slow it down to a single frame, that's going too far.  In the moment, I thought he stayed in, on the replay in the highlights, it looked like his foot may have slipped sideways as he pushed off.  I think that whichever call was made on the field was going to be confirmed because it wasn't clear and obvious, so the TD stood.

The guidance that the CC was given was to only overturn if it was clear and obvious, and if they have to slow it down to a single frame, that's going too far.  In the moment, I thought he stayed in, on the replay in the highlights, it looked like his foot may have slipped sideways as he pushed off.  I think that whichever call was made on the field was going to be confirmed because it wasn't clear and obvious, so the TD stood.

The guidance that the CC was given was to only overturn if it was clear and obvious, and if they have to slow it down to a single frame, that's going too far.  In the moment, I thought he stayed in, on the replay in the highlights, it looked like his foot may have slipped sideways as he pushed off.  I think that whichever call was made on the field was going to be confirmed because it wasn't clear and obvious, so the TD stood.

was his foot off the ground though? You can see his foot coming up in that clip. I saw that live but it's just too close to make that judgement to over turn it when it was ruled in bounds on the field. The plant came down inbounds, so either his foot slid sideways or it only appeared to go out when he picked his foot up. Can you make the determination based on the angle there? That's why it wasn't over turned. 

That was terrible, but the 4th miss is awesome. 

Can't believe how close he was to being out there, but as far as I'm concerned he stayed in bounds. 

Can't believe how close he was to being out there, but as far as I'm concerned he stayed in bounds. 

Rights are subject to reasonable limits, including rights in a collective agreement. 

Hey, I've got 2 mini donut and lemonade trailers
And this year I purchased a third called "Dam Fine Deep Fried"
It sells, hand dipped corndogs, deep fried cheese curds, deep fried cheese cake, creos, chocolate bars, and of course fries and poutine
 
 

I disagree, the Calgary player headbutted and chest bumped Santos-Knox.  Did he embelish it a bit, sure, but they 100% got the call right.
Dickenson losing his **** on a possible turnover that they let play out is a little funny after his team got screwed when they had a short whistle in a previous game is kinda funny.

The people who broke it can't be trusted to fix it.

I do wonder why the individual schools and/or divisions didn't take this step on their own before this though.  I feel like they could have but chose not to, even though they knew it was a problem.
I'm very interested to hear from my daughter when she gets back to school on what difference she finds it makes in her class.  It's been a problem for a couple of years with a good number of the kids.  She doesn't have a device herself and has been very frustrated with the other kids.

This was overdue...big step in the right direction
There were literally no schools who did not have an issue with this
 

Great news from the government banning cellphones in schools for K-8 in Manitoba:
 
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/manitoba-cellphone-ban-schools-1.7295483
 
It's about time, and I'm happy to see that the teachers will now have some recourse against the parents who insist that their kid has to have a phone in case they need to get a hold of them while they are in school.