Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Noeller said:

Everything I remember reading is that Vibert is a "natural" C... Or, at least, that's what he'd played in college. I was hoping he was the guy next year but not sure how polished he is...??

Not really a natural centre, but proficient enough at C that it doesn’t matter imo. He could easily be a starter in this league sooner rather than later at either g spot or c. 

5 hours ago, 17to85 said:

At guard... he's never got much chance at centre where our actual centee being a matador would be an improvement. Kolankowski spends most of the game wandering around like he's lost.

I’d add, no guard has looked terribly great next to kola. 
Eli has excelled in heavy sets on the edge including in pass pro and inside. 

I have no question that eli, and any ar ni C in the league would be an upgrade over kola. he’s that bad. 

It is very hard to properly identify how good an ol is/can be when next to a turn style. The insertion of bond at G and hardrick kicking out to rt took us from a team giving up among the most hits/pressures/sacks to the best ol in the league. 

Id sure like to see how wallace, neuf, eli, vibert and/or vanterpool play with out kola giving up instant disruption and pressure as fast as the qb gets the ball. I mean the Ts will play better too.  Rando and vanterpool are serious contenders for all kinds of awards if c is fixed. 

Posted

I am not qualified to judge OL issues, but it sure seemed to me last year that Brady was getting the holes he needed at the point of attack and that we were getting OL into the second level often enough. 

The ugly OL moments happened in pass pro, Zach dropping back against teams rushing 3-4 -- sometimes Zach wouldn't even get a steamboat before he had to start scrambling, he'd have a DT in his lap or an DE coming round the horn.  Which makes me hopeful that if we get pass pro sorted out, Zach will return to form.

Posted

The rare times kolankowski actually got a block at the point of attack Oliveira would inevitably have a huge gain. 

Simply put our centre sucks and bringing the heavy sets we used a ton of don't mean **** when the middle guy is beat so badly so often by 1 guy.

Posted
1 hour ago, johnzo said:

I am not qualified to judge OL issues, but it sure seemed to me last year that Brady was getting the holes he needed at the point of attack and that we were getting OL into the second level often enough. 

The ugly OL moments happened in pass pro, Zach dropping back against teams rushing 3-4 -- sometimes Zach wouldn't even get a steamboat before he had to start scrambling, he'd have a DT in his lap or an DE coming round the horn.  Which makes me hopeful that if we get pass pro sorted out, Zach will return to form.

run pro almost always does exceed pass pro. The izr scheme we run also means if the inside is shut down he can speed cut to the tackle. His vision while running has been a major part of his growth. It allows him to press the line but still pivot on a slight hesitation or over pursuit by the edge. 

I didn’t see nearly as much ol effectively blocking at the second level, or the classic down field scrum with our ol driving our ball carrier further for added yardage. But guys did get the opportunity, they just struggled getting on a guy and kicking him out or mowing him down. 

 Kola was also the guy heading down field more than the guards which creates a gap but doesn’t get you a seal at the second level. With teams shifting to line up in a 0 or 1 tech on kola that creates the situation where the guard carries the play side or head up dl and he slides off the double team down field. 

 

pass pro and ol play isn’t all time good, but with the way holding is being called, it has a massive advantage in pass pro. especially on the ends. All our ol has to play with inside leverage though to help compensate for our inability to seal the a gaps / nose lane. so our Ts give up too many rushes on looping routes to the qb with speed. 

 Does stan still have it to play head up on a guy and win the battle around the edge? Idk, i would rather see him kick in side. Every one gets better if the hole up the middle is slammed shut though. 

1 hour ago, 17to85 said:

The rare times kolankowski actually got a block at the point of attack Oliveira would inevitably have a huge gain. 

Simply put our centre sucks and bringing the heavy sets we used a ton of don't mean **** when the middle guy is beat so badly so often by 1 guy.

It was painful watching him cruise for a guy and not find any one. Even more painful when the broadcasters would try to make excuses. When you’re the guy who will be doubling then heading down field, you should have an eye on the guy at the 2nd level who you want to hit the whole time.  getting to the point and being all alone is such a red flag for awareness. even if a guy falls down at the second level you should be able to get the 2nd a gap defender. 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, GCn20 said:

When playing from behind BO loses touches. However, in the games where we got behind early part of it was because he didn't run well. Is he the best back in the CFL? Could be, but not by much and he's paid as if he is almost twice as good as everyone else. He isn't and that's the problem. This isn't about BO's ability, it's about whether he is worth his astronomical salary. 

No kidding, Brady loses touches if we're behind. All running backs have that happen. It doesn't mean that we don't pay. Oliveira's a tank. He responds to more work. So, if we have a lead in the fourth qurter, we unleash the running attack & he controls the game wearing down opoosition defenses. Last year, we had a dumbass OC who never used him properly all season long. Like I said, we lose Oliveira it's a clear sign that this is a cheap organization. That they don't spend any money, on other teams or on our free agents. One other question, just what is astronomical when it comes to salary with Lawler, Hatcher, Zach, Harris, & Philpott??

Edited by SpeedFlex27
Posted

Brady had more yards receiving this year than any other I think. His run totals were down but he missed a few games for sure. Almost what 3 4 full ones? 

Posted
2 hours ago, wbbfan said:

It was painful watching him cruise for a guy and not find any one

Vividly picturing a couple notable examples where he's downfield and could easily get a piece of someone but just does nothing. He's just ******* embarrassing.

Posted
2 hours ago, rebusrankin said:

So how much of a bump did Harris get from the $450,000 he got last year? Bet he's still cheaper than Zach.

I would think he’s 500-600k. 

15 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Brady had more yards receiving this year than any other I think. His run totals were down but he missed a few games for sure. Almost what 3 4 full ones? 

4 I think. He also lead the backs in total yards despite the dip in carries. 

Posted
3 hours ago, rebusrankin said:

So how much of a bump did Harris get from the $450,000 he got last year? Bet he's still cheaper than Zach.

I'm just guesssing but unless he wants to bring The Boyz back for one more try at a championship, I'd say Collaros, Kelly & Rourke money. He'd be crazy to not cash in when he can at his age. 

42 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

I'd wager Harris is at 500k not 600k. Seems to be a guy who is willing to take less to help the team unlike Zach.

You don't know that for sure. Walters says they don't renegotiate contracts. 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Goalie said:

I’m guessing Harris decided not to retire cuz they gave him Zach money. 

He deserves it. He had a great season. Finally got the choke collar off him. He actually can stay healthy & win the last game he plays. The Riders wanted him back so I'm sure they paid. Dollah, dollah  bills, y'all. I'll say one thing, the Riders have nuthin' behind him as starting material. Just like us. We have nuthin' behind Collaros. Piss poor planning by the Canadian Mafia. As much as I think Dru Brown plays like a pot head with no emotion or excitement, he'd still be a better option than what we have now. 

Edited by SpeedFlex27
Posted
11 hours ago, rebusrankin said:

I'd wager Harris is at 500k not 600k. Seems to be a guy who is willing to take less to help the team unlike Zach.

Having just won a ring, I kind of doubt he's giving the team handouts. Idr, has he ever renegotiated to a smaller deal? I don't feel like he has, or has taken a team-friendly deal when in a good position him self. 

That said, I think his deal is gonna be good value no matter what. With guys setting the pace for contracts right now, and with how this off-season has already started, $550k for Harris would be tremendous for them. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...