Booch Posted Sunday at 01:08 AM Report Posted Sunday at 01:08 AM 6 hours ago, wbbfan said: I think the only attraction for ott with the pest would be dinwiddie. but i don’t think he’d a gotten the ott job with out wanting to work with brown. I don’t see any chance that whole scenario goes down. Why would any team in a trade give up brown or the pest for zach? If you’re lucky zach has a good year left. Hasn’t had a good one in two years. The other two have a ton of football left in them. Browns deal is great value as well. Madani is garbage as a sports reporter. A less knowledgeable version of suitor. in all honesty...why would any team give up on a younger guy with upside still...and is already pretty much proven...For ZC??....Especially based on what has been seen the last 2 yrs and a bit...never happen and a G.M who did that should get canned wbbfan, Piggy 1 and bigg jay 3
SpeedFlex27 Posted Sunday at 05:41 AM Report Posted Sunday at 05:41 AM On 2026-01-09 at 8:36 AM, Goalie said: Well. Then don’t complain when we don’t sign free agents really. You can’t bring everyone back and honestly Sergio wasn’t even that great. He’s certainly no medlock. And sayles is gonna cost whatever Hamilton paid him and they think he wasn’t worth it. I'm not asking to bring everyone back. You want every player to sign a contract paying peanuts. Castillo is a must. On 2026-01-09 at 10:13 AM, Noeller said: Tremendous comp. Solid, but not special. If he came cheap enough, I'm fine bringing him to camp, but I'm not going out of my way to pay for a guy like Sayles that we SHOULD be able to find a copy of via recruiting. IMO, he is definitely NOT in the same conversation as a guy like Jake Ceresna, who you absolutely would break the bank for. What's your definition of "cheap"? You can't answer that question as youn have no idea.
SpeedFlex27 Posted Sunday at 05:49 AM Report Posted Sunday at 05:49 AM (edited) 5 hours ago, Booch said: in all honesty...why would any team give up on a younger guy with upside still...and is already pretty much proven...For ZC??....Especially based on what has been seen the last 2 yrs and a bit...never happen and a G.M who did that should get canned Not convinced either. But Madani's got us talking about the CFL the first week in January so I thank him for that. Edited Sunday at 06:26 AM by SpeedFlex27 Piggy 1 1
GCn20 Posted yesterday at 01:06 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:06 AM On 2026-01-09 at 9:29 AM, Bigblue204 said: Wasn't Sayles a Bomber find in the last 4 years? Woods/Fox/Adams have all been solid but suffered from lack of playing imo. Woods, Fox, and Adams are the definition of meh Piggy 1 1
bb1 Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago On 2026-01-11 at 1:41 PM, SpeedFlex27 said: I'm not asking to bring everyone back. You want every player to sign a contract paying peanuts. Castillo is a must. What's your definition of "cheap"? You can't answer that question as youn have no idea. Much less than he made with Hammy? 😄😉
SpeedFlex27 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, bb1 said: Much less than he made with Hammy? 😄😉 Another Dollar Store fan who thinks this is 2016, I see. Edited 13 hours ago by SpeedFlex27
bb1 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 6 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Another Dollar Store fan who thinks this is 2016, I see. Definitely shop at the Dollar store,even have some stock! ( which has done rather well actually...😉) Piggy 1 and wbbfan 2
Booch Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Just now, bb1 said: Definitely shop at the Dollar store,even have some stock! ( which has done rather well actually...😉) yeah...It has eh...Dollartree too...got in on that dip in the high 80's...sitting at 136.56 as of today...cha ching a ling wbbfan, bb1 and Piggy 1 3
wbbfan Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Booch said: yeah...It has eh...Dollartree too...got in on that dip in the high 80's...sitting at 136.56 as of today...cha ching a ling fr though. dollar stores are steaming past walmart in popularity. which is kinda of sad when it comes to the economic implications, but screw the waldons. Maybe the cfl should get a sponsorship deal or even mutual marketing deal with dollarama/dollar tree bb1, Booch and rebusrankin 3
wbbfan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/canadian-qb-taylor-elgersma-selected-by-birmingham-stallions-in-2026-ufl-qb-draft/ Elgersma selected in usfl draft With his lingering interest from the NFL, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him in the usfl this year and another nfl camp after that. Piggy 1 1
wbbfan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago hodge also reporting that walters said both bryant and paddy want to continue to play and performed well last year. Which sounds like he’s hoping to lock both back up. I’m fine with running back with both of them and kola gone. I think we need to grab one free agent ol and let every one fight it out for spots. bb1 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 36 minutes ago, wbbfan said: https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/canadian-qb-taylor-elgersma-selected-by-birmingham-stallions-in-2026-ufl-qb-draft/ Elgersma selected in usfl draft With his lingering interest from the NFL, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him in the usfl this year and another nfl camp after that. With the rookie cap, I don't blame him. No incentive to sign with us. Oh look, he was drafted. No Neg List??? Edited 2 hours ago by SpeedFlex27
wbbfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: With the rookie cap, I don't blame him. No incentive to sign with us. Oh look, he was drafted. No Neg List??? yep. Dobson fell into the same gap where the usfl made more sense. He isn’t just looking at a one year thing here too. It’s likely 2-3 year minimum once he comes here before he could get another nfl look.
Piggy 1 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 30 minutes ago, wbbfan said: hodge also reporting that walters said both bryant and paddy want to continue to play and performed well last year. Which sounds like he’s hoping to lock both back up. I’m fine with running back with both of them and kola gone. I think we need to grab one free agent ol and let every one fight it out for spots. Big Stan ,yes. Paddy ? No thanks.
wbbfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Piggy 1 said: Big Stan ,yes. Paddy ? No thanks. If any thing id be less concerned about paddy. He could kick to C or be 6th ol but as a guard with a semi decent C he isn’t nearly as beatable in pass pro and can still move guys in the run game. If big stan loses another step hes basically unplayable at T. He could kick inside, but It would be hard for him to be better than vanterpool inside. It’s also much easier to replace an ni G than an imp T. You can always flip to 3 imp ol if paddy doesn’t pan out. Big stan has always done a great job of maintaining him self. Idk if he would benefit from working on flexibility or even re constituting his physique. The usual stuff ol do to extend the end of their career is less of an issue for big stan, but also less of an opportunity. I’m good with the gamble on both, if we are willing to make the hard move in camp. Paddy isn’t my favorite ol, but he’s pretty high floor as long as we aren’t going to stick him into the lineup when he’s toast physically or other wise. Piggy 1 1
Piggy 1 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, wbbfan said: If any thing id be less concerned about paddy. He could kick to C or be 6th ol but as a guard with a semi decent C he isn’t nearly as beatable in pass pro and can still move guys in the run game. If big stan loses another step hes basically unplayable at T. He could kick inside, but It would be hard for him to be better than vanterpool inside. It’s also much easier to replace an ni G than an imp T. You can always flip to 3 imp ol if paddy doesn’t pan out. Big stan has always done a great job of maintaining him self. Idk if he would benefit from working on flexibility or even re constituting his physique. The usual stuff ol do to extend the end of their career is less of an issue for big stan, but also less of an opportunity. I’m good with the gamble on both, if we are willing to make the hard move in camp. Paddy isn’t my favorite ol, but he’s pretty high floor as long as we aren’t going to stick him into the lineup when he’s toast physically or other wise. I think Big Stan would be awesome inside for at least a couple years , because of how hes taken care of himself. wbbfan 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 28 minutes ago, Piggy 1 said: Big Stan ,yes. Paddy ? No thanks. We'll have a new Center so I expect Neufeld play will improne.
wbbfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, Piggy 1 said: I think Big Stan would be awesome inside for at least a couple years , because of how hes taken care of himself. yeah, even at C too. If you limit the speed he has to face vs on the edge you will certainly get the most out of him. If vanterpool is ready for T, that’s a solid move. If he isn’t, I think vanterpool is much more of a roadgrader inside. Piggy 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now