Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

The only way to beat a pressuring defense is the run game, quick 3 step drop & release, checkdowns out of gun or pistol. have a qb that can move the pocket or able to run & extend plays with his legs. It's unsustainable over an 18 game schedule. Which is why teams with a bad OL... lose on a consistent basis. 

I love to counter pressure with asymmetrical sets and heavy motion. Really put the secondary in a bind. 
Use ncaa style fast rpo, no step or one step throw screens. Throw to the area the defense vacates to pressure, or take advantage of miss matches like slot on lber or rb on db in hitches and quick hitters. Mesh is great vs pressure too. 

They to running vs pressure is to vary up the run touches to keep the D off kilter. Wide and outside zone are great to punish over pursuit, and draws. People tend of thin of draw only as an inside run from the gun, but you can delay toss to punish the edge, you can run search with delay or off a pump fake etc. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Noeller said:

Holm is arguably our best DB. He was a ******* all star this year. It's wildly absurd to suggest getting rid of him.

People are insane for wanting Brady and Holm to be gone....  seriously why would you dump young Canadian all stars?   It's almost like fans are wanting this team to be dead last?    Cut the old guys with big salaries if you want to trim the fat.   

Posted
1 hour ago, Brandon said:

People are insane for wanting Brady and Holm to be gone....  seriously why would you dump young Canadian all stars?   It's almost like fans are wanting this team to be dead last?    Cut the old guys with big salaries if you want to trim the fat.   

Holm isn't Canadian... But still. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Holm isn't Canadian... But still. 

he isn’t the best db on the team either, Nichols is better and worlds better tackling and filling a run fit. Griffin is better too. worlds more physical, versatile, and more steady in coverage.

That said, I could see kramdi being lured back to mtl, and I think nichols could chase a ring on a contender. I think holm is likely to get another raise. He basically played close to the level we paid him at, but we paid him way early. 

Holms consistency and ability to stay healthy despite a pretty slight build/frame is very impressive. Especially for a twitchy closing speed guy. 

I expect us to go to camp with some thing like allen woodbey holm griffin houston with bond and parker fighting for spots. At sam I think ayers, makonzo and smith fight for it. Maybe woodbey or griffin slide to that spot as well. 

Posted
13 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

The only way to beat a pressuring defense is the run game, quick 3 step drop & release, checkdowns out of gun or pistol. have a qb that can move the pocket or able to run & extend plays with his legs. It's unsustainable over an 18 game schedule. Which is why teams with a bad OL... lose on a consistent basis. 

Thats something also that ZC was never good at really either.

8 hours ago, wbbfan said:

he isn’t the best db on the team either, Nichols is better and worlds better tackling and filling a run fit. Griffin is better too. worlds more physical, versatile, and more steady in coverage.

That said, I could see kramdi being lured back to mtl, and I think nichols could chase a ring on a contender. I think holm is likely to get another raise. He basically played close to the level we paid him at, but we paid him way early. 

Holms consistency and ability to stay healthy despite a pretty slight build/frame is very impressive. Especially for a twitchy closing speed guy. 

I expect us to go to camp with some thing like allen woodbey holm griffin houston with bond and parker fighting for spots. At sam I think ayers, makonzo and smith fight for it. Maybe woodbey or griffin slide to that spot as well. 

Yeah...Holm is good...the best...irreplaceable....hardly

Osh made a comment about him and fans and media just ran with it....re-watch every game...he got exposed more times than he made impactful plays...or teams schemed away from him...if anything they attacked his side of field more

I don't say we have to dump him...but if we can get better...or even as good with a younger guy...a physical one as well...for half the cost almost...u do it

We havnt won a cup with him so not like he was a lynchpin on defence

People need to realize if u can get better...and ar game time fix the sms...u do it..

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

Which is just another head scratcher. It was completely predictable that he would not fare well behind this year's OL.

He would have with constant slide protections...moving line and pocket and throwing from different points on the field....sprint and roll outs as our basis of attack....or with a scheme where we didn't basically eliminate parts of the field and have some receivers basically schemed out of any benefit...we were screwd from get go due to an OC with zero clue

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Booch said:

Thats something also that ZC was never good at really either.

Yeah...Holm is good...the best...irreplaceable....hardly

Osh made a comment about him and fans and media just ran with it....re-watch every game...he got exposed more times than he made impactful plays...or teams schemed away from him...if anything they attacked his side of field more

I don't say we have to dump him...but if we can get better...or even as good with a younger guy...a physical one as well...for half the cost almost...u do it

We havnt won a cup with him so not like he was a lynchpin on defence

People need to realize if u can get better...and ar game time fix the sms...u do it..

Hard to say about Holm, how much of those times he was exposed was due to having new and underwhelming corners. I would be inclined to let OShea and Walters determine worth

 

Edited by Pete
Posted
18 minutes ago, Pete said:

Hard to say about Holm, how much of those times he was exposed was due to having new and underwhelming corners. I would be inclined to let OShea and Walters determine worth

 

And why we have a weak...shallow and eroded roster...letting Osh soley determine worth

Holm was targeted extensively the previous yr as well..not just this...and the areas that teams attacked for most part were not corner related. 

Posted

BUT Holm has 'quick feet'....ask Osh.......Someone said it best IF you can get better....you get better.....pretty easy to understand...I wonder if that simple philosophy will be part of the BigBlue in 26'....hmmmmmmm

Posted
11 minutes ago, Stickem said:

BUT Holm has 'quick feet'....ask Osh.......Someone said it best IF you can get better....you get better.....pretty easy to understand...I wonder if that simple philosophy will be part of the BigBlue in 26'....hmmmmmmm

If it isnt...we continue to slide...late dec and early Jan will dictate what we are doing and set the narrative...at moment...I'm not optimistic...but maybe they came to the realization we need to do some significant changes right now...or be faced with a total rebuild/retool and the fact that if they flop hard again...they won't even be part of it...

Posted
19 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

So, along with your qb & five offensive linemen, the Double Wing has two running backs, wingback, tight end & two receivers. Yeah, that was a progressive offense. I'm sure Frankie Filchock & the rest of his 1949 Grey Cup champ Alouettes were all in on that.

Its not supposed to be progressive....its supposed to be violent.

Posted
1 minute ago, Bigblue204 said:

Its not supposed to be progressive....its supposed to be violent.

Controlled violence...much needed...indeed....both sides of the ball

Our back end on defence this yr..was the biggest group of powder puffs in the league..no intimidator at all

We need another Stick...BEnnie T...heck even a Bovell to crush souls and make guys question the decision to prance thru our zones...teams had nary a care in world

Posted
1 minute ago, Booch said:

Controlled violence...much needed...indeed....both sides of the ball

Our back end on defence this yr..was the biggest group of powder puffs in the league..no intimidator at all

We need another Stick...BEnnie T...heck even a Bovell to crush souls and make guys question the decision to prance thru our zones...teams had nary a care in world

I would love to see someone run that style of O though. With legit big TEs and Brady and demski in the back field, with a QB that can run. Two big body Wrs. Today's CFL defenses would have a hard time with that.

Posted
1 minute ago, HardCoreBlue said:

I’d add to the end of the sentence with no mercy provided.

As coach used to tell us...let em know u there...u hurdling a guy on the ground..u give the ribs a lil tap...see a hand...u step on it...

Just now, Bigblue204 said:

I would love to see someone run that style of O though. With legit big TEs and Brady and demski in the back field, with a QB that can run. Two big body Wrs. Today's CFL defenses would have a hard time with that.

Yeah...there needs to be a new oc mind come in and evolve into that...use a true TE on routes...power run game with multiple looks...multiple options...with guys like Bo here..MCi..CLercius...Demski...Add a Philpot or a cruiser like Scott III  to the mix...against a unsuspecting defense coordinator ..good luck with yiur undersized Lb crew handling that for 60 mins...and the secondary would part like the red sea for your burner ...twitchy receivers as they try to adjust to the meat tenderizing they getting exposed too

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Booch said:

And why we have a weak...shallow and eroded roster...letting Osh soley determine worth

Holm was targeted extensively the previous yr as well..not just this...and the areas that teams attacked for most part were not corner related. 

not corner related?? Did you see how often Bridges, then Bonds, then Lawson were torched? And how whenever opposing teams needed 6-10 yds they just threw the quick out? We gave up a lot of deep passes and on almost every one a corner was beaten

Edited by Pete
Posted
2 hours ago, Bigblue204 said:

Its not supposed to be progressive....its supposed to be violent.

It's 3 yards & a cloud of rubber pellets offense. Problem is, in the CFL that's 9 yards. Not 10. So, it'd never work. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Pete said:

not corner related?? Did you see how often Bridges, then Bonds, then Lawson were torched? And how whenever opposing teams needed 6-10 yds they just threw the quick out? We gave up a lot of deep passes and on almost every one a corner was beaten

And how much inside..tons...interior flats...I was talking bout Holm...and his area of responsibilities 

I've been on record saying bridges sucked...and bonds regressed

But the atracking on the inside..intermediate middle...quick shots off tackle...had nothing to do with the corner...they went at Holm/Kramdi area....not Nichols...Wilson ...there a reason...they went after the weaker DB's

The soft coverage for a a quick out as well can be attacking the scheme where the hb has to recognize and take away...if ...and is usually the case the outside guy runs a straight go route...how's that shot to the flat his issue....he leaves his guy and deep shot for easy 6...that's the inadequate play of the Hb and sam not reacting well enough

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Mark H. said:

Which is just another head scratcher. It was completely predictable that he would not fare well behind this year's OL.

What was our Head Coach doing all season long? He talks like he didn't coach & just checked out leaving any responsibilty to others on the coaching staff. See,ms like Osh has just been coasting. Saying he has to take more responsibility in the day to day coaching of the team is just flabbergasting for a head coach of 12 years to even admit that. Then his comments in 2024 that training camp was too easy & laid back which led to our 0-4 start & a rash of long term injuries. Like, WTF??? How did Osh earn a 3 year deal coaching like that to hamstring the team if he just carries on like before????

Edited by SpeedFlex27

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...