Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2025-06-25 at 9:53 AM, 17to85 said:

Like Milt Stegall is the best receiver ever in the league and will always be a fan favourite.... but if they tried to put him in the field we'd all lose our ****.

Every player no matter how great has a best before date. Bighill is well past his.

In a related story the Flames have just signed Morris Lukowich.

Posted
24 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

Nah. We aren’t even desperate enough to dress the ends we do have. 
 

I bet he goes back to mtl if he is reinstated. 

Early last season the Als were fighting to have him re-instated, so they might want him back. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said:

Early last season the Als were fighting to have him re-instated, so they might want him back. 

Yeah I’m pretty sure they would and that they are still pushing to get him back. 
 

I hope the league is better than that. Big early test for the new commish. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

Yeah I’m pretty sure they would and that they are still pushing to get him back. 
 

I hope the league is better than that. Big early test for the new commish. 

The commish has to play by the rules.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tracker said:

The commish has to play by the rules.

No player in the history of pro sports has been found to be betting in his own games, punished, and allowed to return. 
 Pete rose just got reinstated for eligibility to get in the hof since he died. Jontay porter is facing 4-5 years in jail for better on his games and faking injuries to rig his line. 
 No commish or bog has allowed a guy back. They have every reason to instantly decline his application. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

MTL could literally interchange MBT and Evans to keep BC’s D off balance with their different skill sets. I’m not letting go employing a 2qb system.

I’ll just continue to talk to myself on this one. :)

Hardly anyone is running a 1 QB system well.

What do they get, 3 days of 4 hours team period plus game day?

Wow...clock malfunction in Montreal.

No way that play took less than 3 seconds.

How is the command center not fixing this?

Posted
1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Clock didn't even start until Rourke threw the ball.

What the hell is the point of having something like the Command Centre if you can't fix something that obvious?

TSN runs their own clock that won't match the stadium clock exactly.

Posted
Just now, JuranBoldenRules said:

Clock didn't even start until Rourke threw the ball.

What the hell is the point of having something like the Command Centre if you can't fix something that obvious?

Could of Mass challenged that somehow?

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, SaidinBlue said:

Yea, 2nd down play was  an incomplete pass so clock doesn't start until snap.  I went back and looked again.

Yeah but it didn't start at the snap.  It started when Rourke was in his drop from the replay TSN showed synced up to stadium clock.

4 minutes ago, johnzo said:

TSN runs their own clock that won't match the stadium clock exactly.

There's no way a QB could take his drop, throw that pass, have the guy run 5 yards upfield and dive down in less than 3.8 seconds.

Technically diving head first he needs Montreal to touch him down too to end the play so he's not down right when he hits the turf.

Complete garbage officiating and timekeeping to not fix that.

Edited by JuranBoldenRules
Posted
2 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

Could of Mass challenged that somehow?

Probably not.  But Command Centre should have been able to fix it.  Like run a stopwatch from the snap to the end of the play.  There's 3.8 seconds on the stadium clock before the snap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...