Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Morning Big Blue

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Game 47 : Jets @ Sharks - West Coast Story

504718652_slide.jpg

Game Time : I have a dream that this game starts at 3PM on Monday

Game Story : Jets are on a new streak with Hutch the official loser the last 3

Local Celebrity of the Game : What's the best angle to cut someone's throat? Well, usually from behind. That's usually how it works - Nikki Sixx

 

  • Replies 107
  • Views 9.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • The Unknown Poster
    The Unknown Poster

    When Laine is back.  At least watching him and Ehlers and Scheif and trouba is good. 

  • Basically, you pay Trouba $8 million a season for seven years and make Buff your second pairing D...  that's the only out I can see

Featured Replies

Let's see if they can play as good as they did the last 2 periods vs LA 

Hutch starting?

It's an afternoon game. I expect them to crap the bed regardless of who starts. Hutch was ok but 4 5 6 posts tonight helps 

If Helle had played as well as Hutch did tonight, you would be nominating him for the Vezina.

Nope. Bottom line.  We lost. 

We get the Loser point. Hutch was ok. Maybe watch the game again and you will see he was just ok... certainly not great. 

Why bring helle up even? He didn't play. We lost. Budaj was better. 

2 minutes ago, Ducky said:

If Helle had played as well as Hutch did tonight, you would be nominating him for the Vezina.

Again, I didn't see this... I saw Hutch flopping around, giving up bad rebounds and over-committing... but LA was not a good team tonight

 

You didn't see what? Helle playing as well as Hutch? You didn't see what?

3 minutes ago, Ducky said:

You didn't see what? Helle playing as well as Hutch? You didn't see what?

Hutch having a knockout game... he was just decent.  

Or are you now claiming that we're unfairly biased to Helle over Hutch - the same goalie that you've been on a month long tirade about...

I can't keep up.  Let's go back to trading Myers.

5 minutes ago, Floyd said:

Again, I didn't see this... I saw Hutch flopping around, giving up bad rebounds and over-committing... but LA was not a good team tonight

 

What you didn't see was Helle letting in 6 goals in his last 13 shots.

I call a spade a spade...if someone plays well, I give them credit and Hutch played well...do I think he is the answer? no...do I still want to see Comrie? yes. Do I start Hutch next game? yes...will Maurice? doubt it.

Edited by Ducky

1 minute ago, Ducky said:

I call a spade a spade...if someone plays well, I give them credit and Hutch played well...do I think he is the answer? no...do I still want to see Comrie? yes. Do I start Hutch next game? yes...will Maurice? doubt it.

Still clinging to Comrie...  the kid with a .908 save percentage in the AHL.  Same one that let in four goals tonight?

Sounds good.  Lets ruin another prospect as we watch Stuart 'block' shots by standing right in front of him and Enstrom play 'angry squirrel' as the opposition owns the slot. 

11 hours ago, Goalie said:

Nope. Bottom line.  We lost. 

We get the Loser point. Hutch was ok. Maybe watch the game again and you will see he was just ok... certainly not great. 

Why bring helle up even? He didn't play. We lost. Budaj was better. 

I thought the LA OT goal was saveable if he just stands his ground upright but I'm not a Goalie expert. It just seems both our goalies go down so quick giving the top half of the net too frequent.

2 hours ago, HardCoreBlue said:

I thought the LA OT goal was saveable if he just stands his ground upright but I'm not a Goalie expert. It just seems both our goalies go down so quick giving the top half of the net too frequent.

Coaching. Flaherty probably tells them to do that.  

19 hours ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Thornton looks like such a giant tool with that stupid beard

60NL2Eq.jpg

:lol:

Edited by Mark F

19 hours ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Thornton looks like such a giant tool with that stupid beard.  How do you even play a serious professional sport with that big of a beard.  It doesn't make sense. 

I think it's great. It's nice to see the NHL actually have some guys with personality.

1 hour ago, Mike said:

I think it's great. It's nice to see the NHL actually have some guys with personality.

Part of the problem for me is my serious dislike of Thornton.  Burns, don't really care.  That "A" looks nice on Thornton though.

No problem with Thornton's beard...Beards are very Canadian. Lumberjacks and all that. It's a part of our heritage. "Personality" tho, is a buzzword that new-age hockey "fans" like to throw around because they want hockey players to act like NBA players. No thanks...no showboating, no grandiose bragging during press conferences. More Toews-like personalities...

58 minutes ago, Noeller said:

No problem with Thornton's beard...Beards are very Canadian. Lumberjacks and all that. It's a part of our heritage.

I get chopping down a tree with a beard.  I get doing lots of stuff with a beard, including leading your army in an attack on a Confederate position in the Civil War.  I just don't get how you can skate around with this gross sweaty beard on your face, unless of course you are Joe Thornton, and rarely if ever work up a sweat.

3 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

I get chopping down a tree with a beard.  I get doing lots of stuff with a beard, including leading your army in an attack on a Confederate position in the Civil War.  I just don't get how you can skate around with this gross sweaty beard on your face, unless of course you are Joe Thornton, and rarely if ever work up a sweat.

Like you think the beard makes his face too hot or he can't get enough air past the moustache?

Just now, Floyd said:

Like you think the beard makes his face too hot or he can't get enough air past the moustache?

I am not sure why I have to explain this but sure, too hot is one issue.  I just don't know why you would voluntarily choose to play hockey at its highest level with a giant mass of wet hair on your face, when you could choose to not do this instead.  I get "playoff beards" (though I have never seen one as big as Thornton's) if you are superstitious and don't want to shave, but that's just a short time frame, not an entire hockey season.  Anyway, it's my opinion, take it or leave it.

apparently it started as a joke, because people said he couldn't grow a beard as big and crazy as Brent Burns....so he did it. Now, it's just ironically funny. 

Im tempted to make an oral sex comparison to back up KBF's position but Im not sure it would make it past the mods.  ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.