TBURGESS

What makes you think that a rookie QB can 'simply avoid turnovers' or that it 'shouldn't be hard'? I'm sure everyone would be more comfortable if DoubleDoosh hadn't retired or even if we'd kept Davis around, but that's not what happened.

It's based on the reality of our situation without Nichols. I'm not assuming that BC will be good. I'm assuming BC with Jennings is better than us with "Who knows what we have" at QB. If we still had Nichols, my prediction would be very different. Ricky Ray was the last rookie QB to do well and there have a whole bunch of CFL rookie QB's since then. We've gone through tons of them ourselves. The odds are (A figure of speech, not actual odds) that either of our inexperienced QB's are the next Ricky Ray are very low indeed. The most likely scenario is that our young QB's make more mistakes and take longer to process than Nichols would. That's more missed reads, more INT's, more sacks, more 2 and outs. Defense and special teams will need to be lights out for us to have a chance in most games until Nichols comes back. I'm still not convinced that Hall has a shutdown defence despite the talent level. Defense didn't win us games last year anyway. We won them because we scored a bunch of points and didn't turn the ball over very often. I don't see that happening with inexperienced QB's. A negative spin would be that we go 0-6 because we have the worst QB situation in the league. Even Montreal has more experience at the most important spot on the team.

Sorry, I messed up the schedule somehow last night. 😖 Wk 1 vs. EdmWk 2 @ MtlWk 3 @ HamWk 4 vs BCWk 5 @ BCWk 6 @ Tor I can see us beating Montreal, cuz they don't have a starting QB either and look like the worst team in the league. Hamilton could go either way. I don't see that we have the team, without Nichols, to beat Edm, BC or Toronto. I'll still go with a prediction of 2-4 and that's not based on negativity.

Without Nichols, the odds are that we lose to Edmonton, beat Mtl, split with Hamilton and lose both to BC in the first 6 weeks. That's good for a 2-4 record and losing the season series to the Lions.

Thanks for the info. PIA, the VPN I'm using, is about $3 a month so the savings are still pretty good. I'll try a game to see how it goes.

We need to play our interim 'starter' against BC's starters now to get a handle on what they will look like when it counts. Fair to them? Yup. They'll want to play against the starters if they're any good to us.

Which country did you choose? Did it stream consistently? Was it in HD? How much bandwidth?

Shaw has a great deal. TSN's are $14 on Telus and $7 on VMedia. Of course that's on top of your other channel package(s).

It's not about if KG wants to come to Winnipeg. It's about if Edmonton wants to trade their backup QB at all, let alone a Western team.

CFL‏Verified account @CFL FollowingFollowing @CFL More OFFICIAL: The @calstampeders are bringing back an All- receiver! DETAILS of the | http://on.cfl.ca/dvcs30koiT2 #Stamps

Jeff Hamilton‏ @jeffkhamilton FollowFollow @jeffkhamilton More Jeff Hamilton Retweeted Jeff Hamilton To clarify: Conversations of course happen, with teams reaching out to the Bombers as well. But nothing currently in the works. And from what I understand -- and seems obvious -- Kevin Glenn is not even an option.

Personally, I hope Streveler starts. I'd like to see how he fares against BC's 1's and 2's.

Adams to Esks = Glenn to Montreal? 😉

Adams has an 'Upper Body' injury that's keeping him out of practice, making him the wrong guy to bring in if we need someone right away. His 'experience' is 7 games, 43 of 78, for 583 yards. A bit better than Ross, but not that much.

There was no popping noise when I tore my ACL.

I had the same experience. Knew right away something was really wrong when I tore my ACL on a non-contact Volleyball play. Let's hope that isn't Matt's experience.

Sounds like some of our rookies made the most out of their opportunities, which is great. FTR: Edmonton played a bunch more starters against Regina than they did against us.

I don't like the way Brown uses 15 words when 1 or 2 will do.

I like Matty, Climy, Milt and Sanchez. I don't like Shultz or Burris.

I find it funny and somewhat sad that anyone cares what Pederson has to say.

Not the only explanation, just one of the most likely possibilities.

Agree to disagree, but fair enough.

@EdTaitWFC - Canadian DT Ian Marouf was just carted off the field with an injury. Gotta suspect the two things have something to do with each other.

The key points are: Which DI on defence do you sit to get Flanders on the field? A DE (Roh?), LB(Wild?) or DB/Returner(Fogg?)? Is it better to use a DI on a backup receiver/returner or Flanders who isn't a returner IMO? Can LaFrance and/or Demski do Flanders job well enough so we don't have to us a DI on Flanders?

A rookie receiver could give one of the big 3 a rest during the game. He could also be the main returner so we would get double duty from 1 DI. I'd rather backup an import receiver with another import receiver then rely on 3 NI receivers, or a 2 back set, if one of the imports gets injured and they've all had injury history over the last few years.