Rod Black

Welcome to the 2010s, TSN! Glad to have you. 

No adverse inference could ever be drawn from calling her desires to keep her job as “weird”.

I’ll take a guess that Keith Tkachuk’s caloric input far exceeds his caloric burn. 

I’ll take a guess that Keith Tkachuk’s caloric input far exceeds his caloric burn. 

Review the posts on the “he said - she said” theories and how the complainant was “weird”. 

(First bolded part)25k isn't a lot....which should speak to how badly she wants to work in that industry. Why would she want to stay though? The questions you should be asking are, what opportunities can come to her if she stays in the industry? What opportunities can come to her if she stays with that organization? How many opportunities does she have to do that job in a profession where there are less than 50 (I'm not sure what the UFL is like for that specific job so I gave them the benefit of doubt) pro football teams in NA? How might another year of experience help her career? I would suggest that her wanting to stay despite the low pay and harassment shows this may very well be a dream job for her. 
For the record, one of my dream jobs pays less than 35k a year. I'm no longer working in it for various reasons, but if I could i absolutely would. Suggesting $$ is one of the only factors is short sighted.
(Second bolded part) yes, so they did the right thing and got rid of the victim. That will really show the victim that they take harassment seriously! And I bet the accused would really learn a hard lesson. That's just an absolutely ridiculous claim to make. Lol. 

Every statement from Bluto is more douchy than the last.  I pray this guy doesn't have adaughter.

Review the posts on the “he said - she said” theories and how the complainant was “weird”. 

This is completely unrelated to the point I was making... Bluto is very confused why she would want to continue working for the Argos despite being harassed at work... suggesting the onus is on the employee to leave rather than the organization to rectify the issue

so just to be clear... your stance on this specific part of the scenario is.... if someone was harassed at work, that person should be to the one to leave and give up on their dreams... with no onus on the organization to create a harassment-free work place.... if that is not what you believe, it doesn't show in your posts.    

Review the posts on the “he said - she said” theories and how the complainant was “weird”. 

Next we’ll hear how she dressed provocatively at work and must have been asking for it, because “he said”. 
Her dream job. Aspirations for promotions…

What if he was really really hungry? 

Next we’ll hear how she dressed provocatively at work and must have been asking for it, because “he said”. 
Her dream job. Aspirations for promotions…

The idea that it's always the victim's fault to change is disgusting.
Change the way you dress because this man can't control himself. Change the way you speak because you're upsetting this man. Change your job because this player is trash and can't control himself. 
It's not a surprise that the usual chauvinists are gaslighting. 

Next we’ll hear how she dressed provocatively at work and must have been asking for it, because “he said”. 
Her dream job. Aspirations for promotions…

Those new ribbon scoreboards look cool.

Why do we always expect the victim to leave? 

I think a lot of it has to do with 2 things. 1- sign of the times. SA/SH is being taken Uber seriously which is appropriate IMO by today's business world(well the good ones anyway) and 2-violence, while being limited, is still very much a part of today's game. Harrassment is not at all part of the sport especially with staff that doesn't play. 
It's embarrassing at this point. 

No adverse inference could ever be drawn from calling her desires to keep her job as “weird”.

Can we all just agree that Kelly is a wiener and the league is better off without him? TSN (and the league to some degree) both look like idiots for forcing him on us as the new face of the league, when everybody could tell something like this was the inevitable conclusion.

No adverse inference could ever be drawn from calling her desires to keep her job as “weird”.

They (witnesses) said, They (don't like what the witnesses) said.

Sorry Jay, but it is precisely still a he-said she-said... but it just becomes a they-said they-said.