Ed Tait ‏@WFPEdTait  35m35 minutes ago

Stanley Bryant back at work for #Bombers. NP: Lamar, Richards, Brown, Moore, Kohlert, Stoudermire, Richardson, Unamba, Johmson, Neufeld #bn

 

Darrin Bauming ‏@DarrinBauming  15m15 minutes ago

New DB on the field for the #Bombers — 5'9" 178lb Akron Zips product Malachi Freeman, wearing No. 14.

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

 

I highly doubt it. He's shown enough potential that he's certainly worth keeping around.

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

And Portis was downright not very good from my vantage point. Inconsistent beats out consistently not very good

 

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

 

 

Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy.

Marve had a couple very impressive runs and a TD pass. Showed me enough that he can contribute and continue to be the exciting player that he is

 

 

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

 

 

Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy.

 

You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz.

 

BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz.

 

 

 

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

 

 

Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy.

 

You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz.

 

BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz.

 

 

Except Roadgriller had ZERO stats to back up his love for Goltz.

Would make about as much sense as cutting Ian Wild and Johnny Sears before the start of the last season.  Or any player with one year left on their contract.

 

How did this get from zero to stupid so fast?

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

 

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?  

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?

There's some logic there, for a 3rd string developmental roster spot. If it were a starting or backup spot, I might have a different opinion.

 

 

 

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

 

 

Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy.

 

You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz.

 

BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz.

 

He might be inconsistent but he did some things and was more effective than the other back ups so let's not cut the guy

you have a very low bar for what you deem a fetish

Brian Brohm Interview

http://www.bluebombers.com/video/index/id/111057

 

Drew Willy Interview

http://ow.ly/i/bgiBf

 

willy interview just a photo of Drew. no interview.

 

 

great interview with Brohm.  He seems really smart, confident. 

 

thanks for the links

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

 

Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy.

You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz.

 

BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz.

He might be inconsistent but he did some things and was more effective than the other back ups so let's not cut the guy

you have a very low bar for what you deem a fetish

No, actually, I can see where Logan is going with that statement. Seems to me it's far too early to be gushing about a 3rd stringer at this point.

 

 

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?

There's some logic there, for a 3rd string developmental roster spot. If it were a starting or backup spot, I might have a different opinion.

 

 

I disagree.  It's irrelevant that he didn't sign a contract back in December.  I'm sure Osh couldn't care one way or the other that he's playing out this year. All that matters to him is that he progressing along, and making plays and moving the chains. 

 

 

 

 

 

As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.

Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.

I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice.

 

Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy.

You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz.

 

BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz.

He might be inconsistent but he did some things and was more effective than the other back ups so let's not cut the guy

you have a very low bar for what you deem a fetish

No, actually, I can see where Logan is going with that statement. Seems to me it's far too early to be gushing about a 3rd stringer at this point.

 

 

Fact is Marve should be the backup. Is the objective in football not to move the chains and put points on the board? Marve has been able to do so effectively and on a consistent basis.

Would make about as much sense as cutting Ian Wild and Johnny Sears before the start of the last season.  Or any player with one year left on their contract.

 

How did this get from zero to stupid so fast?

 

it didn't start at zero. started pretty close to stupid.

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?

There's some logic there, for a 3rd string developmental roster spot. If it were a starting or backup spot, I might have a different opinion.

I disagree. It's irrelevant that he didn't sign a contract back in December. I'm sure Osh couldn't care one way or the other that he's playing out this year. All that matters to him is that he progressing along, and making plays and moving the chains.

That's cool. We don't need to agree.

Fact is Marve should be the backup. Is the objective in football not to move the chains and put points on the board? Marve has been able to do so effectively and on a consistent basis.

See, that's where your obsession rears up, when you say "fact is".

Fact is, he's the #3 QB and will stay #3 until he progresses to the point that the Coaching Staff deems he is capable to be everything a backup QB needs to be.

I'd love to see packages specially designed for his skill set and from there if he progresses...good on him.

But I have more faith in Brohm as the situation stands. That's my opinion, and in fact, it's the way it is right now.

 

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

 

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?  

 

Pay no mind to him, he hitched his fan wagon to Portis a while back and wants to be vindicated for that it seems. 

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?

Pay no mind to him, he hitched his fan wagon to Portis a while back and wants to be vindicated for that it seems.

I said Portis looked good in a couple practices. I haven't hitched my wagon to anyone. Where do you guys come up with these assumptions??

I've explained my logic here. Not saying Marve will be cut, but there's a strong case to support that decision.

I'm more concerned about 4 QB s throwing for a combined 160yds passing vs a team that threw for 350 yds passing. Is this an early warning of last years passing production?

I'm more concerned about 4 QB s throwing for a combined 160yds passing vs a team that threw for 350 yds passing. Is this an early warning of last years passing production?

 

 

 

 

Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.

So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?

Pay no mind to him, he hitched his fan wagon to Portis a while back and wants to be vindicated for that it seems.

I said Portis looked good in a couple practices. I haven't hitched my wagon to anyone. Where do you guys come up with these assumptions??

I've explained my logic here. Not saying Marve will be cut, but there's a strong case to support that decision.

 

There isn't a strong case and it simply comes across as you trying to justify your ideas that Portis should be #3.